Don't Look Up

Don't Look Up

We are in the season where political leadership is being decided - from Brazil to Great Britain, from the Chinese Communist Party Congress to American congressional midterms. And no matter the continent involved or the system of government, as human beings, we seem to succumb to the same temptation over and over. Let’s just hand it off to the guy who promises to take care of everything for us.

We have plenty of examples here in the United States. One mayor introduced a bill to change the rules, and got the votes to pass it, allowing himself to run for an unprecedented third term. One president claimed to be able to solve all of our problems?unilaterally with his pen and phone after having said as a candidate that his nomination would slow the rise of the world’s oceans. A later candidate asked for control of solving the nation’s?problems saying, “I alone can fix it.” And “I am the only one that matters.”

Throughout history and around the world, (mostly) men who have viewed themselves as saviors and strongmen have risen to power by claiming that they can solve all the problems and deliver all the benefits. And throughout history, while things might have gotten better in the short term, over the long haul, they have all been wrong, have failed to deliver what they’ve promised, but have amassed more power in the process.

As human beings, we seem tempted by the cult of personality from those who promise much, in return for power and control. We also realize that concentrated power can lead - almost always does lead - to abuse of that power. And so both corporate systems and many political systems are designed to check and balance power. In the United States, the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government are co-equal, expressly to prevent the concentration of power. In the corporate world, a fiduciary board serves to represent the interests of the shareholder, to prevent the concentration of power in a management team. Labor unions originally arose as a counter-balance to the power of the employer.

Despite these structural safeguards, there is usually a drift toward concentrated power. Too many board rooms serve as rubber stamps to a CEO. Too many politicians spend time in office seeking to bolster their power rather than serve their constituents. And labor unions have become power centers of their own.

Here’s the truth: too many of us would rather sit back, point up, and hope someone else will take care of things, fix things, and solve things - so we can just keep doing what we like doing, or what we’ve always done. We hope for the heroic leader so that we don’t have to lead ourselves. Whether in our role as voters or employees, we are still lured to the easy route of just handing it all over to someone else to fix.

People hope it can be that simple. Unfortunately, it never works that way. Inevitably, when decision-making becomes too concentrated, when individuals become too passive, when differing viewpoints and perspectives are no longer considered, when position and power become an end in themselves, bad outcomes result. It is true the world over and in business as well as politics.

Real leaders know their purpose is not to collect power but to change the order of things for the better. Actual problem solving always requires collaboration with others who might actually understand the problem better than a single individual who hasn’t experienced the problem ever could. Actual problem-solving requires collaboration with others who may not agree with you on everything but will work with you to build support for a solution that’s sustainable. And most of us think far more clearly and therefore make better decisions when we are pressed to explain our logic and defend our point of view.

Remember what real leadership actually looks like. There are plenty of problems close by that you can help solve. Don’t look up for salvation. Look at yourself in the mirror and then look at those around you. And when someone promises you they know it all and can do it all, remember that when something sounds too good to be true, it usually is.

Giuseppe Finocchiaro

Corporate Strategy | Communications & PR ☆ Institutional Affairs ☆ Project and Event Manager ☆ Space-Energy-eMobility - ESG

2 年

Great share Carly Fiorina!

Well said. Most of the times rights holders tend to be disillusioned when their leaders/duty bearers fail to fulfil their promises. Then the rights holders look up for another savior who will solve their problems. This never materializes again. indeed, if only the followers/rights holders actively provided solutions to the problems affecting them at the expense of totally leaning on the leader, prolly strides would be made positively. However, sometimes even if the citizens or individuals are taking matters into their hands for a new dawn, it never becomes successful because of the systems that are bias towards the leaders.

回复

Thank you for sharing this in GLS ??????

回复
Stephen Cary

Chief Engineer at 2 Phase - INNOVATIVE SWITCH SOLUTIONS, INC.

2 年

One comment or follower said run for President. It was a female actor in the movie “Don’t Look Up” that Played the Presidential Role. Leaders relate to the Followers from time to time, have you every connected to a Follower - male, female or non binary in anyway? In any of these Linkedin posts?, if No, maybe we can partner - because I do like your political speaking. The male domination of the board room must end, and this can only happen with the civilized discussions. Non-Binary Types Married to Be President and Vice President, Republican and Democratic. This way Man and Wife, as running mates can run in both Republican Debates and Democratic Debates. I said this to my wife - you can be the President, assigned to push MAD button, and I will just be a engineer designing how to run the country. She can deal with the Gender Politics and I will blast those males in the technology departments of those GE Wind Enron Turbine Blade Companies that exist in America.

shahid aziz

tech/ engineer at Daily jang news paper

2 年

congratulation very nice article this is great i like it

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Carly Fiorina的更多文章

  • Reflect to Lead

    Reflect to Lead

    Independent thinking requires perspective, and gaining perspective demands intentional thought, introspection, and…

    51 条评论
  • The Power of Reflection: A Leadership Discipline

    The Power of Reflection: A Leadership Discipline

    Gaining perspective and making tough choices require thought, introspection, and careful consideration. We cannot…

    60 条评论
  • Metrics

    Metrics

    This week, we will return to the Leadership Framework and tackle the third side of the Leadership Framework: Metrics…

    25 条评论
  • Celebrating the Spirit of Freedom and Unity

    Celebrating the Spirit of Freedom and Unity

    As we gather to celebrate the 4th of July, I am reminded of this day's profound significance in our nation's history…

    22 条评论
  • Process & Structure

    Process & Structure

    Recently, I wrote about the first part of the Leadership Framework: Strategy. If you haven’t read that or if you missed…

    27 条评论
  • STRATEGY

    STRATEGY

    Hopefully, you have read last week’s newsletter that introduced The Leadership Framework. If not, you can read it here:…

    18 条评论
  • The Leadership Framework

    The Leadership Framework

    It’s been about four years since I started my LinkedIn newsletter, and I’m grateful for our shared journey. Over this…

    36 条评论
  • Process-Driven Leadership

    Process-Driven Leadership

    Last week, I wrote about the first part of the Leadership Framework: Strategy. If you haven’t read that or if you…

    24 条评论
  • Strategic Clarity

    Strategic Clarity

    Hopefully, you have read last week’s newsletter that introduced the Leadership Framework. If not, you can read it here:…

    15 条评论
  • Framework Revisited

    Framework Revisited

    Welcome back to a pivotal piece from our archives: a post I shared when I started this newsletter that remains a…

    24 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了