Don't blame voters

Don't blame voters

If you enjoy this content, please subscribe to my Substack for a more consistent experience.

This week, Prime Minister Trudeau lost two by-elections, one of which was in the fortress of Montreal. This is the second time he has lost a Liberal stronghold in the last three months.

Losing like this always hurts, even when the writing is on the wall, as it has been for some time now.

But the PM’s response is one that surprised me, because it’s one I’m used to hearing from corporate leaders, not elected officials.

Here’s what he told reporters as he walked into Cabinet the next day:

“We need people to be more engaged, we need people to understand what’s at stake in this upcoming election.”

Does that sound benign to you? If so, it shouldn’t.

It is, whether intentional or not, a finger pointing exercise. And the target? Voters?

There is no “first rule” of public affairs, but if I were to put forward a candidate for such a rule, it would be there:

“Don’t blame voters.”

If you lose a campaign, voters are not to blame. You are.

And this is true of regulatory campaigns in the corporate world. It is your responsibility to educate, motivate, engage, and ultimately, mobilize voters into action.

If you fail to do so, it’s because you’ve failed to align your message to your audience’s values. Your framing, positioning, and messaging has missed the mark. You have failed to give people a reason to rally behind your cause.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Joseph Lavoie的更多文章

  • Carney's Decisive Win, with Dan Arnold

    Carney's Decisive Win, with Dan Arnold

    In this week’s episode of Craft Politics, Percy and I welcome our first Big-L Liberal! The episode is also on YouTube…

    6 条评论
  • Why changing minds is harder than ever

    Why changing minds is harder than ever

    My Substack subscribers received this newsletter two days ago. To get next week's newsletter two days early, you can…

  • The most successful corporate campaign of all time?

    The most successful corporate campaign of all time?

    I hope you enjoy this sneak peek of my next newsletter. The full edition will go live on February 15th on my Substack.

    1 条评论
  • I analyzed two years of Pierre Poilievre speeches and videos

    I analyzed two years of Pierre Poilievre speeches and videos

    Hey everyone, if you want to get my weekly newsletters, it's best to Subscribe to my (renamed) Substack, Power Shifts…

    2 条评论
  • 8 Regulatory Powers

    8 Regulatory Powers

    A quick note before we start: My Substack subscribers received these videos two weeks ago when I released them. If you…

  • Nintendo's regulatory lessons + Campaign Planning

    Nintendo's regulatory lessons + Campaign Planning

    If you want to receive these updates in real-time, please consider subscribing to my two Substacks, Business is…

  • Revisiting PR vs Public Affairs

    Revisiting PR vs Public Affairs

    Plus, when you fail, it's on you. And geopolitics? It's your business If you want to receive these updates in real-time…

  • The myth of big beginnings

    The myth of big beginnings

    If you enjoy this content, please subscribe to my Substack for a more consistent experience. To win your regulatory…

  • The Silent Disruptor

    The Silent Disruptor

    If you enjoy this LinkedIn Newsletter, I encourage you to subscribe to the Substack version for a more customized and…

  • Make the first 100 days count

    Make the first 100 days count

    Starbucks’ new chief executive has pledged to restore the coffee chain’s status as a “community coffee house.” Which…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了