If domestic flights were banned....
Last Friday (2nd December) the?European Commission gave the go ahead?for France to ban flights between Paris Orly airport and Nantes, Lyon, and Bordeaux. France wants to ban flights between cities that are linked by a train journey of less than 2hr 30min, as part of environmental measures.?
This got me thinking about what the effect would be of a similar ban in the UK, and indeed how much domestic air travel we have where rail is a viable alternative.
I started my career in aviation, working for British Airways in the 1990s. This was a boom time for domestic aviation, with the extensive 'turn-up and fly' Super Shuttle network to/from London, along with a wider domestic network from other regional cities.
A corner of Heathrow's terminal 1 was devoted to BA's domestic network, and Manchester even had the whole 'Terminal A' dedicated to domestic flights.
I moved from aviation to public transport in 2000, and over the years I've watched that domestic flight network fade to a shadow of its former self. My perception was that domestic air travel had gradually faded from prominence, as flying has become more cumbersome, and domestic rail frequencies improved.
However, a couple of colleagues challenged this assumption, asserting that domestic flights are just as popular as ever.
This prompted me to dig into the data, and understand the make-up of our current domestic flight market, and where people are still choosing to fly, where rail may be a timely alternative.
I downloaded the most recent air passenger journey statistics from the CAA website, covering the month of September 2022. These provide a count of domestic airline passengers (scheduled and chartered) for each of the 223 origin/destination combinations served in the UK in September. In total there were 1.4m domestic flight passengers in the month, (of note, this includes passengers making a domestic connection to an international flight).
For each of these routes, I then used FastJP to look-up the fastest weekday rail journey time (using Thursday 8th December timetable) for each route. I did this between the main city/town rail stations for the city/town served by the airport.
For example, flights from Heathrow are compared with train journeys from London; flights from Teesside are compared with rail journeys from Darlington; etc. This is imperfect, as we don't know the actual origin/destination of individual passengers, but in balance they are more likely to be to/from the town / city served, than the airport itself.
Islands
The first point I noted, is that we define 'domestic' as 'within the UK and adjacent British Crown Dependencies' - i.e. that includes Northern Ireland, Scottish islands, Isle of Man, Scilly, and the Channel Islands. These are routes where there is no rail alternative. Flights to/from islands make up 52.5% of our domestic flights.
领英推荐
Anglo-Scot
The next largest category of flights are those between England and Scotland, accounting for 41.7% of all passenger journeys (around 585,000 passengers in the month). By way of comparison, there were just under 10m rail passengers between England and Scotland in the 12 months prior to Covid, which had grown from 7m in 2010 (albeit this will include some shorter cross-border journeys)
The rest
The vast majority of the remainder are flights entirely within England (81,000 / 5.8%), the majority being between Manchester and London, and Newcastle and London.
If the UK banned flights where there is a suitable rail alternative
If the UK applied the same 2hr 30min threshold as France, then that would ban the flights between Manchester - London, and Leeds - London (albeit the latter were scrapped by FlyBe last month anyway). This would ban about 1.8% of domestic flights.
Extending to 4hrs would remove Newcastle - London, (and two very small routes: Edinburgh - Manchester, and East Midlands - Newcastle), taking the total to 3.5%.
You would need to extend a ban to 5hrs to remove the majority of the London - Scotland routes, taking the total to about 30% of domestic journeys.
If you extended the ban to any route where there is a rail alternative of any duration, you would ban just under half of domestic flights.
Edit: You can explore the full 2022 data in Tableau here:
Hi Richard, a bit late to the party here! But great post – really interesting and useful analysis. We have taken a similar look at this, including potential CO2 reduction of removing some air routes (using 4.5 hrs as the cut off): https://flightfree.co.uk/post/should-a-domestic-flight-ban-be-applied-in-the-uk/ We also have a petition running at the moment for the gov to introduce this as a policy. Just less than a month until it closes, and nearly at the required 10k for a government response... Pls take a look and see what you think! https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/649992
Co-Founder of MY8.IO
1 年People on the Isle of Man will be a bit miffed (25 mins flight time to Liverpool) as well as a lot of the Scottish Islands...
Pre pandemic I did a fair amount of international travel...on one occasion I had a 7am flight from Guernsey to Manchester flight arrived on time, I live on a rail line approximately 75 miles from Manchester Airport by train it was 2.30pm when I got home... in the North our rail services have deteriorated I used to commute to Manchester I could catch a train at 07.10 take me all the way and sane back in an evening... not anymore so better to drive..every trans pennine train I take from Manchester to Leeds is late and I miss my connecting train... added to this we just lost a brilliant regional airport at Doncaster... we are poorly served in the North of England so I mostly hub via Amsterdam and use the KLM city hoppers for connecting flights
Driving client innovation in customer service, payment and ticketing
1 年Very interesting analysis. As previous user of the super shuttle pre 9/11 and pre climate change action, I suspect volumes have declined due to real cost and convenience. However, have you compared to road use where capacity and volume have increased. I suspect coach and car have filled the gap. Maybe a ban on 200+mile road trips?
Independent Rail Strategy Consultant
1 年Nice - thanks Richatd. Be interesting to see this expressed as CO2e savings of removing the sub 4hr journeys. I suspect in reality unlikely to be adopted even if it works in France. But it should be possible for rail to be in a fair fight - which means tax parity between rail and aviation for fuel and allowing multi (& open access) operator route competition on all intercity rail routes. Final very minor point, nearest East Coast station to Teesside Airport is Darlington (not Durham as used in example). Won't materially change the results but was surprised by the error. Is it because you're from Yorkshire?!