Domain Partitioning vs Techincal Partitioning

Organizations that design systems … are constrained to produce designs that are copies of the communication structures of these organizations. - Malvin Convoy

In the intricate world of software architecture, decisions shape the structure and behaviour of our systems.

As the First Law of Software Architecture asserts, every choice comes with its trade-offs. One such critical decision revolves around how architects partition components within an architecture.

Two prevalent approaches in this regard are Domain Partitioning and Technical Partitioning, each offering distinct advantages and considerations.

Technical Partitioning:

Technical Partitioning, as the name suggests, organizes architecture based on technical capabilities. This approach often manifests in the form of layered architectures, where the system's functionality is divided into distinct technical layers such as presentation, business rules, services, and persistence.

For instance, the familiar Model-View-Controller (MVC) design pattern aligns with this approach, simplifying developers' comprehension.

When to Use Technical Partitioning?

- Clear Separation of Concerns: Technical partitioning facilitates the separation of technical concerns, making it easier for developers to navigate and maintain the codebase.

- Reduced Coupling: By isolating components based on technical capabilities, changes in one layer are less likely to ripple through to others, thus reducing coupling and promoting modularity.

Major Characteristics:

- Organized by Technical Capabilities: Components are grouped according to technical functionalities such as presentation, business logic, and persistence.

- Decoupling Technique: Enforces a level of decoupling between layers, mitigating the impact of changes on dependent components.

Domain Partitioning

In contrast, Domain Partitioning focuses on organizing components around domains or workflows rather than technical capabilities. This approach, often associated with Domain-Driven Design (DDD), emphasizes modelling complex systems based on independent and decoupled domains.

When to Use Domain Partitioning?

- Reflects Real-World Scenarios: Domain partitioning aligns with real-world business workflows and changes, making it particularly suitable for complex systems.

- Improved Maintainability: Components structured around domains are easier to understand and maintain, especially as the system evolves.

Major Characteristics:

- Organized by Domains: Components are grouped based on domains or workflows, reflecting the natural structure of the problem domain.

- Emphasis on Independence: Promotes independence and decoupling between different domains, facilitating scalability and flexibility.

Example: Catalog Service in Online Shopping

Consider an online shopping platform with a Catalog service responsible for managing product listings, categories, and inventory.?

Technical Partitioning:

In a technically partitioned architecture, the Catalog service might be divided into layers such as presentation (UI), business logic, and persistence (database interactions). Each layer handles specific technical concerns: the presentation layer manages how products are displayed to users, the business logic layer handles pricing and availability rules, and the persistence layer deals with storing and retrieving product data from the database. While this approach offers clear separation of concerns and ease of maintenance within technical boundaries, it may lead to duplication of Catalog-related logic across layers, making it challenging to maintain consistency.

Domain Partitioning:

On the other hand, domain partitioning would organize the Catalog service around business domains or workflows. In this scenario, the Catalog service encapsulates all functionality related to managing products, categories, and inventory. Components within the Catalog service are structured based on business logic, such as product catalog management, category management, and inventory management. This approach aligns closely with the real-world domain of online retail, making it easier to understand and maintain as the system evolves. Changes to Catalog-related functionality are localized within the Catalog service, promoting modularity and scalability.

Conclusion

In the software architecture, there's no one-size-fits-all solution.?

Both Domain Partitioning and Technical Partitioning offer unique benefits and trade-offs, guided by the First Law of Software Architecture.?

However, recent industry trends show a leaning towards domain partitioning, especially in the context of monolithic and distributed architectures like microservices.?

Ultimately, the choice between these approaches marks one of the initial and pivotal decisions an architect must make, shaping the foundation of the software system's design and evolution.

If you’re looking for someone to talk to about software development, agile methodologies, or the cloud or software industry in general then feel free to revert me back.

Also if you have any suggestions regarding my blog, drop a comment so I can do better next time.

till then...

Happy Reading..! ??

Thank you.?