Dogmatism doesn't Innovate

The essence of change is straightforward: true innovation is rare, especially in corporate environments where social dynamics can overpower more effective voices. ?Often, the most vocal personalities dominate, leaving innovative yet quiet contributors sidelined, ultimately reinforcing mediocrity at the decision-making level.

Historically, computing was an elite field for the brightest minds. ?But as personal computing and widespread programming took root, IT transitioned into a more routine, "blue-collar" sector. ?This shift allowed teams to piece together systems reactively, with minimal architectural foresight, resulting in a tangle of applications that require excessive maintenance. ?Consequently, IT bloats into one of the largest cost centres, misaligned with business strategy.

? So, how can this cycle be broken?

Automation holds the key to alleviating dependency on expansive, often mediocre IT staffing.? By drawing on innovative contracting models, like the US Department of Defense’s Other Transactions (OTs) and Commercial Solutions Openings (CSOs), businesses can diversify their vendor engagement and expedite the integration of advanced technologies. ?Change must start with a select group of forward-thinking leaders who see the limitations of legacy methods and are committed to shifting the business toward sustainable, scalable processes.

Transforming an organisation demands leaders skilled in managing complex systems and aware of organisational psychology. ?Real innovation hinges on a culture shift that fosters intellectual agility, creativity, and adaptability. ?Those responsible for daily operations offer essential expertise, but they are typically too immersed in routine to lead on strategic transformation; they function as part of the operational machinery, not as drivers of change.

For a lasting impact, innovation should arise from an independent hub or unit beyond the conventional operations team, empowered to challenge norms. ?Often, “external experts” bring the necessary distance and fresh perspective, as Einstein remarked, “We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.”

Cognitive biases, such as confirmation and status quo biases, can further restrict the problem-solving capacity of those embedded in the system. ?A fixed mindset among staff, combined with a tendency toward groupthink, favours comfort over critical innovation. ?Thus, innovation suffers when internal processes cling to outdated methods instead of exploring meaningful change.

True organisational evolution comes from leveraging specialised, adaptable talent, promoting collaboration, and valuing cognitive diversity to balance analytical and creative insights. ?For businesses struggling with sprawling, poorly configured systems and high regulatory demands, restructuring must start with a dedicated, reform-minded core group that is unbound by rigid hierarchy and focused on nurturing a culture of innovation and operational resilience.

Looking at how the US Department of Defense, combatted their bureaucracy and stifled innovation, any organisation can use these lessons and strategically implement a transformation blueprint inspired by the DoD’s reformist approach.? The organisation can evolve from a sprawling, inefficient entity into a streamlined, adaptive force for innovation. ?The result is a robust, regulation-ready operation capable of outpacing competitors, attracting top-tier talent, and fulfilling regulatory requirements with greater ease. ?With a smaller, specialised, and highly skilled workforce, the organisation can reclaim efficiency, accountability, and a reputation for forward-thinking excellence.

Reform-driven Leadership and Vision Setting

A small group of leaders with both a strategic outlook and technical expertise must lead the charge and preferably not be from the organisation or at least not entrenched in its hierarchy. ?This reform team should comprise individuals skilled in complex systems, organisational psychology, and large-scale operational transformation. ?The goal is to instil a vision for an adaptive, agile organisation that values problem-solving and systematic innovation as primary traits over mere procedural execution.

• Establish an internal “Innovation Task Force” within the company to envision and drive structural reforms. ?These leaders should focus on instilling principles of intellectual agility and innovation across the organisation.

Separate Innovation from Operational Execution

As with the US Department of Defense’s innovative talent programs and think-and-do tanks, the business should establish a distinct “Innovation Hub” independent from day-to-day operations. ?This hub would host a blend of external experts and internal disruptors who bring a fresh perspective, unburdened by the biases of entrenched systems. ?This hub would tackle issues of automation, regulatory compliance, and operational efficiency, working as an incubator for new methods and technologies to alleviate dependence on sprawling, poorly configured legacy systems.

• Form an “Innovation Hub” with autonomy and a mission to explore creative solutions for the company’s core inefficiencies, regulatory adherence, and process automation. ?This hub should actively engage in partnerships with third-party tech firms, consultants, and think tanks to access cutting-edge technology and operational methodologies.

Specialise and Automate to Combat Mediocrity

The most effective solution to a bloated, mediocre IT system is strategic automation and a lean operational design. ?As the DoD utilised Other Transactions (OTs) and Commercial Solutions Openings (CSOs) to streamline acquisition of technology, the business should deploy advanced automation to streamline routine, manual tasks. ?By automating fundamental processes, the business can then focus on maintaining a smaller, more specialised team of high-calibre personnel to manage and refine core systems.

• Implement a “Lean Operations Initiative” where core processes are mapped, simplified, and automated where possible. ?Reduce dependencies on manual, labour-intensive processes by investing in automation tools and platforms that integrate seamlessly with regulatory frameworks such as NIST and SOX.

Break Down Siloed Structures and Promote Cross-functional Collaboration

By deploying cross-functional teams like sprint-like “think-and-do” tanks, the organisation can foster collaboration across departments that may otherwise work in silos. ?Such collaboration breaks down the bureaucratic mindset and encourages creative solutions, promoting a balance between technical precision and innovative freedom. ?These teams should focus on short-term pilot projects, iterating solutions that can be scaled organisation-wide.

• Launch “Cross-Functional Agile Teams” focused on rapid prototyping, testing, and refining new processes and systems. ?These teams should have the autonomy to pilot new solutions in real-time without the constraints of traditional approval channels.

Promote a Culture of Intellectual Agility and Systematic Adaptability

Cultural transformation is fundamental for breaking free of conformity and stifling groupthink. ?This requires nurturing a culture that values intellectual agility, curiosity, and openness to change. ?Encouraging employees to question the status quo and propose creative solutions without fear of reprimand will foster a sense of ownership and innovation across the organisation.

• Run “Innovation and Agility Training” sessions that teach employees to embrace change, think critically, and collaborate openly. Introduce “Innovation Days” where employees can showcase their ideas for process improvements, thereby embedding a culture of adaptability and continuous improvement.

Outsource for Fresh Perspectives

Just as the US Department of Defense engaged external experts, an organisation should look beyond its own workforce to inject fresh ideas and specialised knowledge. ?Whether by contracting consultants, engaging technology vendors, or partnering with academic institutions, outside perspectives can challenge entrenched mindsets and stimulate strategic thinking. ?This approach will prevent cognitive biases such as status quo and confirmation bias from limiting the organisation’s problem-solving capabilities.

• Develop a network of “Strategic Partnerships” with consultants, technology firms, and universities. ?These partners can provide both expertise and fresh viewpoints that prevent insular thinking and help sustain ongoing innovation.

?