Do You Carry Too Much Baggage In Your Sales Process?
Daniel Hebert
I help founders learn sales skills | Head of GTM at Savio | Want me to audit your sales process? Send me a DM ??
As Sales Ops pros and Sales Leaders, one of the things we struggle most with as we're scaling up our sales team is how messy our process gets along the way.
One of the reasons why the process gets so messy is we don't document everything involved from lead to close - from the people who need to be involved, the tools, to all the different admin steps we're taking at every single stage of the process to get a deal done.
Without the full visualization of all the admin tasks from start to finish, it makes it hard for us to understand how to optimize and scale our process.
SaaS Scale-up Struggling with Proposals
I'll give you an example. I was talking to a Sales Director at a 120 person SaaS company (40 people in the sales team) not long ago, and they were struggling with putting proposals together, getting them to their customers fast enough.
They're in a competitive market, and the customer experience really matters. In order for them to put their best foot forward, they spend a long time on the look and feel of their proposals.
As a result, their competitors were coming in and stealing deals because they couldn't get a compelling proposal out the door.
And he was telling me about how he's copy-pasting stuff from multiple word documents into one doc and then go into Google drive to find the latest case study. Then he's trying to put all of it into Canva to mock up a design, just to end up sending it to the designer, wasting multiple people's time.
It took two or three days to get something out. This is WAY too long.
He asked me how he could make the process of putting a Word/PDF proposal together more efficient?
The reality is, do you REALLY need a Word document? Do you need a PDF? Is that a requirement in your industry, where your clients absolutely NEED that kind of document in order to close a deal?
Probably not. So why are you doing this?
The guy couldn't answer.
It was just the way it had been done. It was what the sales reps, leaders, and marketing designers were familiar with. They didn't know of any other way.
He was thinking about it from the wrong angle. He was trying to automate some of what he had. But what he was using as a proposal wouldn't even deliver the best customer experience in the first place.
And he's not the only one who's struggling with process design/improvements:
- Insidesales.com found that reps spend 63% of their time on non-selling tasks
- Salesforce Research found that 45% of reps say their process is ineffective because of excessive admin tasks
- And CSO Insights found that 50% of forecasted deals don't close in time or at all.
Are You Building a Franken-Process?
There are lots of Sales Leaders or Sales Ops professionals that, when they think about their process, they think about how to optimize what they already have. Making it 1% better every week or month. Small changes and additions over time.
Adding more tools. Hiring people to take on the work. What you thought would help and scale - which does in the short run - ends up creating a HUGE mess over time.
When you look at your current process, ask yourself it's the right change or thing to put in place now. What worked well 10 years ago doesn't work now. Trying to optimize an outdated process is the wrong approach.
Is your process limiting what you can do? Both from enabling your own sales reps, but also delivering a better customer experience?
Are you handcuffed by the way you're thinking?
And do you have the right mindset around your process?
For example, when you're building out your proposal process, if your mindset is around optimizing the creation of a Word doc or PDF to make the creation way more efficient, then your mindset is not even the right place. That's what you should have done 5-10 years ago.
There are lots of tools on the market now (go check out the top rated proposal software on G2) that can deliver a much more engaging, interactive customer experience that are better than your traditional proposal, and WAY easier for reps to put together.
So when you're building process, think about what kind of baggage you're carrying from what you already have in place, and REALLY understand if you need to optimize what you have.
And if you were to eliminate all of that, what could you do instead?
Would it be a better experience for both your reps and your customers?
I'd love to get your thoughts on this.
Are you guys tacking on stuff to your old process and putting a Franken-process together? Are you trying to optimize what's not even the best customer experience in the first place?
Leave your feedback or opinion in the comments below, like this, share this with your peers. Let's get a conversation going.
GTM Advisor, Fractional Sales/ Sales Enablement leader, Sales Coach & Trainer
5 年Dan-?I agree with the general point your article.? Based on my experience at several companies including @TOPO Research and Advisory?and @Compass, I think of the sales process as mapping out the following key components:? (1) The buyer status- as many others write about, the sales process needs to be aligned to the buyer and the buyer experience. This experience is often not linear, despite how we draw it up on paper. The mantra 'It begins with the buyer' is important to keep it mind and include in your sales process and onboarding. (2) Sales objectives- this informs the sellers of their objectives during certain phases of buyer engagement. They should inform the target outcomes of meetings for sellers which they should articulate in the form of a PAO, at the beginning of a meeting, to prospective buyers.? (3) Key steps- the key activities, which involves sales process workflow, that they seller needs to take during each phase. The goal is to make the workflow, execution of the workflow and the buyer experience as simple, efficient, and pleasant as possible. Your article speaks to this and I think you have an opportunity to help readers struggling for solutions even more by telling them, specifically, where the main places are in sales processes that you see the opportunity to better automate the workflow (Article title? The Top 5 Opportunities For Automating Your Sales Process Workflow??) (4) The sales plays (the meetings that almost always happen throughout any sales engagement; these are the meetings and conversations that our sellers need to master in order to provide a good buyer experience and convert and progress opportunities at higher rates and in several? cases, higher velocity (5) Sales tools. These are the tools that we need to provide reps to execute the plays (checklists, documents, collateral etc.) (6) Examples. These are examples of the the tools and conversations/plays that we utilize during the sales process. Specificity wins so we need to provide sellers with direct examples so they don't return to their day job after attending a training or reviewing a playbook still trying to figure out what they need to do specifically? (7) Exit Criteria. In studying and researching the sales processes of high performing sales teams I have found that they have specific, measurable, actionable, relevant criteria on BOTH the part of the buyer and the seller for determining when to go to the next stage. Companies debate whether and where they should have 'hard gates' (e.g., proof, documents that must be completed with the CRM) throughout the sales process. A place where sales automation can be very helpful, to ensure that reps are not "speeding" and that we have the right data or information is in the exit criteria. Thanks for sharing Dan.