Does your brand need some 'logotherapy'?
I love the fact that the word ‘logotherapy’ exists. I love the true meaning of the word. And I love what many people will mistakenly think it means. For me, it has a beautiful multiplicity of meaning that I’m not going to do any justice to in the next couple of hundred words.
But here goes anyway.
If you’re anything like me you will be sick to the back teeth of trying to explain to non-marketing people that their brand is not their logo. I know it shouldn’t get me irate. But it does.
“Stop talking about your f****** logo. I’m not going touch your precious 80s image of a globe surrounded by a swoosh and poorly kerned business name in Bodoni. I don’t give a rat’s arse about it. It’s not important.”
But still the brand conversation continues to gravitate towards the merits or otherwise of refreshing the logo to make it more appealing to millennials. Whatever!
So it was with ironic delight that I stumbled upon the science of ‘logotherapy’.
Initially I thought it was an attempt by a large brand agency to create a proprietary method of ever so slightly evolving brand logos. A scientific method that accurately measures the exact amount you can change a logo to keep it fresh and up to date without anyone actually noticing.
You’d be amazed just how much time, effort and money goes into tweaking logos that are designed for no one to notice. Don’t believe me? Spot the difference between these two logos.
This is the new, 'tweaked' logo...
This is the old logo….
Those eagle-eyed designers will spot the difference. But for the rest of us mortal cereal munchers the changes are just too subtle to notice. And if you think these are identical, you're wrong. This is a prime example of the fine science of logo befuddlement. And if you don't believe me I’ll give you a clue at the end of this article so you can spot the difference.
(As an aside, if anyone is thinking of developing a proprietary methodology to scientifically measure exactly how far you can change a logo without anyone noticing – too late. I’ve already got one; MicroBrandBolloxIt)
But no. ‘Logotherapy’ isn’t the science of minimal logo evolution. It is in fact a form of psychotherapy developed by Viktor Frankl. The theory is founded on the belief that human nature is motivated by the search for a life purpose. Logotherapy is the pursuit of that meaning for one's life.
Now I don’t profess to have a deep understanding of Frankl's theories. They are complex and way beyond my limited brain capacity. I do have a copy of Frankl’s book “Man’s search for meaning” and while it’s a highly motivating piece of work, it isn’t a particularly easy read. Not only is Frankl incredibly intelligent and writes at a very high level, his ideas were heavily influenced by his personal experiences of suffering and loss in Nazi concentration camps. This makes it very poignant and yet humbling at the same time.
However, what I do take from his book is the belief that it is the striving to find a meaning in one's life that is the primary, most powerful, most motivating and ultimate driving force in humans.
And that, my friends, is what I believe to be the primary, most powerful, most motivating and ultimate driving force in brands and business. To find meaning. To have a purpose. And to involve as many people as possible in the pursuit of that purpose.
Frankl quotes a phrase first used by Nietzche which is “He who has a why to live for can endure almost any how.” There is huge wisdom and strength in these words. It feels wrong to apply Frankl’s insight to the context of brand and marketing when you think of everything he had to endure in the concentration camps. But if we were to apply his theory and appropriate just the merest of associations to our world of marketing, it would be to tap in to the full force of man’s search for meaning in everything we do. Including building and growing brands.
We all know how difficult it is to get any sort of traction in today’s competitive landscape. Drawing on the timeless principles of man’s in-built search for meaning could just be the thing we need keep us all going. Good for our brand. Good for our business. Good for our customers. Good for our souls.
PS If you’re still thinking about those Kellogg’s logos; look at the space at the bottom of the second ‘L’ and the ‘O’ where they connect and the space between the two ‘G’s where they connect. See? Different.
Creative Director @ Airborne Studio | Branding & Identity
7 年Really interesting read, thanks for sharing. I'll be going back to branded cornflakes too now they've finally joined the letters properly... :D
Experience & Service Design Director
7 年Totally agree with the points your making here related to brand, although do think 'Purpose' is a risky word to use in this space. Strategists and Consultants have conflated its real meaning (that which drives person or entity) with the idea of doing something great, good and global (as in some huge CSR initiative). Also feel I have to point out that what your describing isn't really Logotherapy — Logotherapy is one philosophical school of thought about human psychology. Existentialism is the philosophy I think you're describing that relates to purpose — that what drives people through their life is exploring the question "why do I exist?". (Although it is a great title for getting the attention of 'designers'.)
Founder of Better Company. Co-founder of StudioLR.
7 年Great piece Simon, thanks for reinforcing.
B2B Brand strategy | Author | Non-Exec & Board Advisor | Goldman Sachs 10ksb alumni | 42 under 42
7 年So true! Great article Simon. Finding purpose is the glue that holds teams together, creates exceptional customer experiences and attracts customers. I'm so passionate about this I lectured on it for the Exec MBA course at MMU Business School last night :-)