Does The Truth Even Matter??

Does The Truth Even Matter??

Two weeks ago, it was former United States Senator Rick Santorum WHITE WASHING AMERI AN HISTORY WITH HIS REMARKS IN HIS ADDRESS BEFORE A REPUBLICIAN VOTER BASED EVENT ABOUT NATIVE AMERICANS.

Now you have TWO local state representatives in the state of Tennessee WHITE WASHING AMERIECAN HISTORY AGAIN WITH THIER COMMENTS ABOUT THE 3/5THS COMPRISE, STATING IT WAS ABOUT ENDING SLAVERY IN THE UNITED SATES - WHAT A BUNCH OF FUCKING BULLSHIT, I AM NOT EVEN AMERICAN AND I KNOW WHAT THE 3/5THS MEANING AND IMPLIED USEAGE OF IT MEANS.

THE 3/5THS DOCUMENTS ARE IMBEDED IN THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 1 SECTION 2 - THIS IS BEFORE ANY OF THE AMMENDMENTS MADE TO THE CONTSTITUTION IN REGARD TO INDIVIDAUL RIGHTS AND FREEDOOMS.

SUCH AS YOUR 1ST AND SECOND AMMENDMENTS WHICH ARE THE TWO MOST FOUGHT AFTER (defended) Amendments out of the 33 amendments made to the American Constitution.

There is no other cherished and copied form of democracy in the world than The United States Constitution. Some let me make it loud and clear Article 1 section 2 of the American Constitution specifically addresses the White European founders of the independent country of The United States of America, that slavery is and was considered essential in the progress and success of both American Democracy and the country itself.

What exactly is the 3/5ths doctrine written into the United States Constitution (Article 1 section 2,) clearly states out and explains that Black Slaves, are not to be considered the same equal value of a white American. The Black man was given the designation of only being equal in 3/5ths status and stature of a white man. With this designation article 1 section 2 of the United States Constitution clearly states that only white men may be landowners and only landowners would be allowed to vote.

SO, RACISM IS BUILT INTO THE CONSTITUTION AND CONSIDERED ESSTENAIL TO THE PROCESS AND SUCCESS OF THE UNITED STATES AS AN INDEPENDANT COUNTRY (remember the US was a British Colony at first.)

What is the 3/5ths Comprise that was raised in the state house of representatives in Tennessee - FOR STARTERS IT WAS NOT MEANT TO END SALVERY AS TWO STATE REPS FALSELY CLAIM.

THE 3/5THS COMPRISE WAS AN AGREEMENT THAT SOME NORTHERN STATES AND SOUTHERN STATES AGREEED TO, TO ALLOW WHITE LANDOWNERS AND SLAVE OWNERS TO DECLAIR THAT THE SLAVES THEY OWNED WERE NO LONGER ONLY CONSIDERED 3/5THS OF VALUE AND STATURE OF A WHITE MAN AND WERE TO BE CONSIDERED EQUAL TO A DERGEE (every 5 slaves owned was considered of equal value of 3 white men.)

THIS COMPRIMSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOME NORTHERN STATES AND SOUTHERN STATES WAS DONE PURELY FOR FINANICAL GAIN FOR THE SOUTHERN STATES - THUS ALLOWING THEM TO RECIEVE MORE FEDERAL MONEY FROM WASHINGTON (basically if black men were considered equal to a white man, then the southern states would receive more federal money to help the state financially offset its expenditures due to population growth - let's just call it rude and rough form of a US Census.)

Now why are GOP lawmakers bringing this up today and why are they lying about it (stating the 3/5ths compromise was meant to end slavery - Bullshit, slavery was still allowed and in existence for another 90 years in America after this comprise.)

FOLLOW THE MONEY - THE REASON IT IS BEING BROUGHT UP TODAY, IS BECAUSE GOP LAWMAKERS ARE TRYING TO WHITEWASH AMERICAN HISTORY IN THEIR FAVOUR, SO THEY WILL GET RE-ELECTED.

IN OTHER WORDS, THEY ARE WHITEWASHING AND LYING TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ABOUT AMERICAN HISTORY AND MIXING THEIR OWN FALSE IDOLOGY THEY PEDDLE TO YOU THE VOTER - FOR THEIR OWN SELFISH REASONS. WHICH IS PURELY BASED ON PERSONAL FINANICAL GAIN IF THEY ARE RE-ELECTED OVER AND OVER - I REPEAT NOT YOU THE VOTERS INTERESTS.

PERSONAL FINICAL GAINS OF CONGRESS MEMBER/SENATOR: Best to get re-elected as much as you can.

The current base salary for all rank-and-file members of the U.S. House and Senate is $174,000 per year, plus benefits. 

Annual allowances

Members of Congress receive annual allowances that cover the personal expenses of doing their job. This includes expenses for their office, travel, goods and services.

Healthcare

Congressmen and senators purchase their insurance through an Affordable Care Act exchange. 72% of their premiums are covered by a federal (taxpayer funded,) subsidy. When they retire, they can qualify for lifetime health insurance under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.

Pension

After serving for five years, a member of Congress is eligible for a pension. Their retirement benefits depend on their plan, age and how long they served in Congress. A member of Congress can collect their full pension at the age of 62 or if they are age 50 with 20 years of service. Though it is a common belief that they can earn their full salary amount in retirement, this is not true. They can earn up to 80% of their final salary, though this high percentage is rare.

Family death gratuity

If a member of Congress dies while serving in office, their family can receive a payout equivalent to a year's salary.

Free parking

Congressmen have the perk of free and reserved parking in DC-area airports. They also have various flight perks.

Other sources of income for members of Congress

Members of Congress must follow restrictions for the amount of outside income they can earn while serving in office. Senators and representatives may only earn up to 15% in excess of their annual congressional salary. Federal laws prevent them from earning any income from fiduciary relationships. This rule helps prevent any conflicts of interest within Congress.

Congress members may earn income from their personal investments since the law considers them "unearned" income. This could include money made from rent, interest, or stock dividends. These earnings are not a part of the 15% rule because members in this situation are collecting income on assets they already own.

SO, AGAIN, A CONGRESS MEMBER OR SENATOR WANTS TO GET RE-ELECTED TO SERVE THEIR OWN PERSONAL INTERESTS FIRST AND YOU THE VOTERS SECOND.

You may be wondering why I am writing about this: Simple, If your elected representative is willing and knowingly lying about American History, purely for the benefit of one (themselves.) What makes you think these lawmakers won't lie about you a business owner, or company that disagrees with them. These are our law makers that are lying, the same law makers that propose and legislate the laws that we must operate within as citizens and businesses.

THE OTHER REASON I AM WRITTING ABOUT THIS: Because I am tired of this bullshit ideology being accepted and adapted as part of the Canadian landscape.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了