Does The Second Amendment Trump The First Amendment?
Bruce Turkel
“Bruce speaks with confidence and competence, triggering the audience to build solutions.” Grey Goose Vodka
Does the Second Amendment Trump the First Amendment?
By now anyone not living under a rock knows all about the horrific school shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. 14 teenagers and three adults were killed in cold blood when Nikolas Cruz sprayed the South Florida school with an AR-15 assault rifle.
Regardless of your opinion of what happened or what should be done, you’ve been discussing the massacre with your friends and your co-workers and you’ve seen endless debates and discussions on TV news, in the newspaper, and on social media.
In fact, the only place they’re NOT discussing the gun issue is exactly where they should be talking about it; in the Florida state legislature.
That’s right, the Florida state legislature. That’s because less than a week after one of the deadliest school shootings in U.S. history happened in Florida, the state House of Representatives voted down a measure to discuss the assault weapons ban.
Yes, you read that correctly. The state House of Representatives voted down a measure to discuss the assault weapons ban. They didn’t vote down an assault weapons ban. They didn’t vote down a measure to re-implement the assault weapons ban. Florida state representatives voted down a measure to even talk about the situation.
The vote was on a suggestion to consider a motion to ban assault rifles and high-capacity magazines. Not to ban the weapons, mind you, just to discuss the possibility. But instead of allowing such an important debate to take place, the House defeated the motion 36-71. Amazingly, the “no” voters included nine South Florida Republicans – the very lawmakers who represent the area where the slaughter took place.
The list of Miami representatives who voted “no” includes Michael Bileca, Jose Oliva, Carlos Trujillo, Bryan Avila, Daniel Anthony Perez, Jeanette Nunez, Manny Diaz Jr., and Holly Raschein. Representatives Bill Hager and Rick Roth of Palm Beach County also voted to shut down the conversation. And even more shamelessly, Representative George Moraitis of Broward County (where Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School is located) callously skipped the vote altogether.
From the Miami New Times: “According to Associated Press reporter Gary Fineout… ‘a reasonable person might assume a state rocked by a gun massacre might at least let the full House vote on the idea — but not Florida’s Republican-dominated, NRA-beholden House.’”
Remember, we’re not talking about the legislature refusing gun control or refusing to vote on gun control. We’re talking about the legislature refusing to even DISCUSS the problem and possible solutions. Or as I see it, the legislature simply decided the Second Amendment (the right to bear arms) matters while the First Amendment (freedom of speech) does not.
Within the Bill of Rights, the First Amendment requires only 45 words to assure all Americans of their significant liberties:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”
Based on the simplicity and ubiquity of the First Amendment, Americans think freedom of speech is a basic right that we all enjoy. Unfortunately, the Florida legislature clearly thinks otherwise.
In his prescient novel 1984, George Orwell predicted a future where human rights – including freedom of speech – do not exist anymore. As Orwell wrote: “Whatever the (legislature) holds to be truth is truth. It is impossible to see reality except by looking through the eyes of the (legislature).”
Since the Florida state legislature hasn’t actually read the Bill of Rights, I can’t imagine they’ve read 1984 either. Regardless, while George Orwell may have predicted this trampling of our rights coming true in 1984, the Florida state legislature simply moved the date to 2018. And we will all suffer the consequences of their egregious behavior.
If you want to see more about this subject, here’s last week’s CNNi interview with Richard Quest where we talked about companies ending their NRA sponsorships:
This is nonsense. The first amendment is not in any way violated by congress voting not to discuss any given issue. Legislative branches of government vote against discussions every day, and have since the beginning of the country. It is not an Orwellian travesty as this article would suggest. Most often they simply do not have time to discuss every issue that is presented. To be fair, they SHOULD be discussing this very issue. but them voting not to is in no way a first amendment violation.
Simplifying companies promotional needs is what I do. ?? | Corporate Branded & Uniform Apparel
6 年Heartbreaking!!!
Principal, Strategic Marketing & Brand Intelligence
6 年Time to make a difference with your vote when it’s time to re-elect!
“Bruce speaks with confidence and competence, triggering the audience to build solutions.” Grey Goose Vodka
6 年Control your knee-jerk reaction for a moment Raul and go back and read what I wrote. Nobody said anything about resending anything. What I said was that the Florida legislature owes it to the people who put them in office to discuss this problem and look for a solution. Instead of working for all of us they are acting in puppet-like lock step to the commands of their paymasters.
Businessman / Former Banker and Investment Advisor / Editor / Commentator on digital and legacy media
6 年Let me get this right Bruce: you want to use your First Amendment right to trample the Second Amendment? Your kind of thinking is downright dangerous. Wanna rescind the Second Amendment? Follow the Constitutional provisions to do so. I will debate you on this subject anywhere and anytime including on television, radio or digital media. I suggest you first read the majority opinion in DC v. Heller.