Does pushing your body to its limits take away the health benefits related to training?

Before I get into this, I just want to say that this summary isn't my own work but I thought for a newsletter it would be great for you to read.

I'm subscribed to a membership which is brilliant.

It takes topics and looks at research on it before summarising it all and this one is gold.

I've condensed the main parts for you.

I probably didn't need to say that first part BUT I always like to be clear.

Lets get into the article.

The relationship between exercise and health has long been thought to follow an “inverted U” shape. This idea suggests that while regular exercise can significantly enhance health and longevity, pushing it to the extreme, as elite athletes often do, might become counterproductive. To explore this notion, a new study by Foulkes et al. (2024) analyzed the longevity of the first 200 men to break the 4-minute mile barrier, a feat achieved by only a small fraction of athletes.

Overview of the Study

The study sought to determine if achieving a sub-4-minute mile was linked to a longer or shorter lifespan than that of the general population. To achieve this, researchers identified the first 200 male athletes who ran a sub-4-minute mile using a publicly available register. They then compared the life expectancy of these runners with that of the general population, controlling for factors such as sex, age, year of birth, and nationality.

The findings revealed that these elite runners, on average, lived 4.74 years longer than the general population. Interestingly, the longevity advantage of sub-4-minute milers has decreased over time. Those who achieved this milestone in the 1950s lived an average of 9.2 years longer than the general population. This benefit shrank to 5.5 years for runners in the 1960s and to 2.9 years for those in the 1970s.

The Trade-Offs of Elite Athleticism

This study’s findings contribute to the ongoing debate about the potential trade-offs between athletic achievement, health, and longevity. While elite runners who have broken the 4-minute mile barrier do live longer than average, the shrinking advantage over time could be attributed to various factors. Improvements in modern medicine and healthcare have extended the lifespan of relatively sedentary individuals, reducing the gap in life expectancy between elite athletes and the general population.

The study does not, however, directly address whether extreme exercise engagement might undermine longevity compared to more moderate levels of exercise. Other research has suggested that moderate exercise provides the majority of health benefits, with diminishing returns beyond a certain threshold.

Is There an Optimal Exercise Volume for Longevity?

Another study by Franklin et al. (2020) explored the optimal amount of exercise for maximizing health benefits. They found that the maximal benefits were observed at 300% to 500% of the standard physical activity guidelines (150 minutes of moderate exercise per week, or 75 minutes of vigorous exercise). Further increases in exercise volume, such as reaching 1,000% of the guidelines, offered only a slightly reduced mortality risk (31% compared to 39% for 300-500%).

This suggests that while there may be diminishing returns at extremely high levels of exercise, pushing to those extremes doesn’t necessarily carry a significant negative impact on longevity. However, it's important to note that the data at very high exercise volumes is limited, making it difficult to draw firm conclusions.

Extreme Training: Health Risks and Considerations

Elite athletes who undergo extreme training may encounter specific health risks, including musculoskeletal injuries and conditions such as atrial fibrillation or coronary artery calcification. Still, these risks are often manageable with appropriate training and medical supervision. Additionally, some deaths attributed to athletic participation often stem from undiagnosed congenital heart conditions or the use of performance-enhancing drugs, rather than the volume of exercise itself.

It’s crucial to distinguish between different types of high exercise volumes. For example, the physical demands placed on a professional athlete differ significantly from the physical activity experienced by individuals in arduous manual labor. Therefore, future research should focus on separating these populations when assessing the impact of high physical activity levels on health and longevity.

Key Takeaways

1. Exercise Benefits:?Moderate physical activity substantially improves health and longevity. Elite-level training, like achieving a sub-4-minute mile, does appear to confer a longevity advantage, but this benefit seems to be shrinking in recent decades.
2. Diminishing Returns:?While the health benefits of exercise tend to plateau after reaching 300-500% of the recommended guidelines, pushing beyond this limit does not significantly impair longevity.
3. Sport-Specific Risks:?Some athletic endeavors, particularly those involving intentional weight gain (e.g., American football linemen) or activities with high injury risk, may have long-term health consequences. Proper load management and medical oversight can mitigate some of these risks.
4. General Advice:?For most people, meeting general physical activity guidelines or aiming for 8,000-10,000 steps daily provides significant health benefits. Elite athletes or those pushing exercise volumes much higher than 10x the guidelines might face specific risks, but their longevity is not necessarily compromised.