"Does GDPR stop us from accessing work emails of an employee who has left the company?"?
Photo by Webaroo.com.au on Unsplash

"Does GDPR stop us from accessing work emails of an employee who has left the company?"

A question I get asked a fair bit. My response is always the same: "it depends". Mostly it depends on how you have set up your own internal policies and procedure to deal with GDPR. GDPR on its own would not stop you accessing this data.

If we look at it in its simplest form, the name and email address of individuals are both personal data, and therefore fall under the scope of the GDPR. The contents of those emails may identify the individual, but on the whole, will be commercially sensitive information that may be of value to business once the employee has left. This leaves a bit of a dilemma for a company that hasn't set up their policies and processes to deal with this type of scenario.

So, the things I would be considering (and this probably isn't everything, but a good start):

1) You have a legitimate interest in processing that personal data beyond the point that the employee leaves the company. Make sure that lawful basis, purpose of processing, and the email retention period is reflected in your record of processing, legitimate interest balancing test, and the Employee Fair Processing Notice.

2) As a general rule, you should ensure that commercially critical information/emails are stored in a secure, centralised area, rather than in one person's inbox. That area can have its own retention period.

3) You can't rely on consent for the processing of employee data, the balance of power is wrong, so the consent would not be valid.

4) Have a policy in place that work email is used only for that purpose, to negate the possibility of the email inbox containing personal information that you would not be expecting.

5) Remember that if you get a subject access request for emails, you do not need to include commercial information, only personal information. Within an employee's inbox it is unlikely that there will be significant amounts of personal information about him/her. (Any opinions about their performance is likely to be in the HR system or management inboxes and so your should definitely look in all those too).

6) Overall, be transparent. Let employees know (via the Fair Processing Notice) that the company will maintain access to their inbox once they have left and why you need to do it. It's not an unreasonable thing to do and employees should not be surprised that you need to do so.

If you haven't put these steps in place, or you have put overly strict internal policies in place stating that you won't access corporate emails, then you may be shooting yourself in the foot. On the one hand, a strict policy of deleting former employee emails will make SARs easier to handle (as long as you have documented the policy!). On the other, if that email inbox contained information you need to meet a client's expectations/bring in the next big deal/resolve a legal issue, then you are placing yourself at a disadvantage and incorrectly blaming the GDPR.

The GDPR is not there to put the brakes on your business. When implemented properly, it is there to stop undesirable behaviours and increase trust between you, your employees, suppliers and customers alike.

Vannesha Mae

GDPR-P | IPA NL

4 年

Just came accross this article 9 months later, but I was wondering, what would you consider then as a "legitimate interest in processing that personal data beyond the point that the employee leaves the company"?

回复
Claudio Ladeira

Creating a Partner Integration Platform for the Future of Farming

4 年

Aaron Engel do you know what is the law in Brazil?

回复
Jaspreet Kaur Ichpunani

Growth and Transformation Leader; Client Partner

5 年

Brian Wrona , this is the point that I made the other day. Each company has a different way of creating GDPR related policies. Your overall approach to how you implement is most important. You have to be transparent to your data subject and make sure your policies are within the boundaries of GDPR or any other policies which may overlap.

Dr. Alexis P.

| #DrPrivacy | FSU Law Grad | Data Privacy Advocate | Global Cybersecurity, Compliance & Risk Management Compliance Leader | Mentor | Educator | Research Fellow | Privacy Expert (GDPR, CCPA, LGPD), HIPAA, CMMC |

5 年

(4) is spot on, with a notification about usage of the information and user agreement around company data.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Tash Whitaker的更多文章

  • The Road to Barbieland is re-opening - kinda

    The Road to Barbieland is re-opening - kinda

    UK-USA Adequacy Yesterday, the UK government announced that that that had agreed an adequacy decision with the USA, to…

    3 条评论
  • An explainer: Personal Data flows to the US - what's going on?

    An explainer: Personal Data flows to the US - what's going on?

    I'll start of by saying that my audience for this is non Data Protection people, who just want to know what is going…

    26 条评论
  • Every day's a school day....

    Every day's a school day....

    Over the last few weeks I have had a lot of conversations with people about cookies and realised that there is so much…

    13 条评论
  • Superheroes beating up superheroes just isn't what we need right now.

    Superheroes beating up superheroes just isn't what we need right now.

    So, lockdown is tough and affects people in different ways. That is the only way I can excuse the individual that send…

    15 条评论
  • Data Protection Courses & Qualifications - a bit of an honest review

    Data Protection Courses & Qualifications - a bit of an honest review

    Now I've finally heard that I passed my DP Cert (with distinction - go me!) in Data Protection Law and Information…

    38 条评论
  • Data Protection Impact Assessments: To Do or Not To Do?

    Data Protection Impact Assessments: To Do or Not To Do?

    Yesterday someone said to me, “but my business doesn’t need to do Data Protection Impact Assessments”. They may just as…

    11 条评论
  • GDPR - Taking off the "L" plates

    GDPR - Taking off the "L" plates

    Think of May 25th as if it was the day you took your driving test; you've done the preparation (hopefully), you've…

  • Taking the Leap

    Taking the Leap

    After a 2 and a half year stint (although over 15 years in total), I am leaving Dun & Bradstreet. The "why?" is…

    25 条评论
  • Money Laundering Regulations 2017 - 4 months on...

    Money Laundering Regulations 2017 - 4 months on...

    It’s now been almost 4 months since the long awaited, “Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds…

    1 条评论
  • Scouting for Equality

    Scouting for Equality

    Last night, my 5-year-old daughter was invested as a Beaver Cub. I have never seen her so happy or so proud as when she…

    37 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了