Does FTC v. Ascend Ecom Signal a New Era of AI-Powered Deceptive Advertising Enforcement?
Chip Cooper
eCommerce Attorney. I help marketers, advertisers & agencies solve their FTC earnings claim compliance problem for a fixed, flat fee. Get new strategies by downloading my Earnings Claim Guide and newsletter (Link Below)
The FTC’s “Operation AI Comply” Targets Marketers That Use AI to Supercharge Deceptive Ad Claims and Business Practices
FTC v. Ascend Ecom (September, 2024)
The FTC alleged that Ascend Ecom used unsubstantiated earnings claims and false promises of risk-free investments to lure consumers into an e-commerce business opportunity scheme.
Central to this case is the FTC’s Business Opportunity Rule, which Ascend is accused of violating through deceptive advertising and failure to provide required disclosures.
Ascend Ecom didn’t comply with the New FTC Earnings Claims Framework.
FTC Allegations
The FTC complaint outlines several deceptive practices by Ascend Ecom.
领英推荐
The Broader Impact of Operation AI Comply
The FTC’s allegations against Ascend Ecom, specifically that Ascend Ecom falsely attributed its business model's success to AI tools, make the case a good fit for the FTC’s “Operation AI Comply.”
Bottom Line: The FTC’s case against Ascend Ecom underscores the risks of leveraging AI-based claims with business opportunity offers without adequate substantiation.
Conclusion
With its enforcement action against Ascend Ecom, the FTC has made it clear that there is no “AI exemption” from compliance with advertising laws.
The FTC focused on (i) efficacy claims (i.e. does the AI-enabled product work as advertised?), and (ii) AI-enabled product exaggeration claims.
The FTC is on the lookout for earnings claims that promise AI-powered results.
For Informational purposes only; not legal advice