Does Communist China hold grudges against Britain, Japan, the West for inflicting pain, suffering, miseries and millions of deaths in the past?

Does Communist China hold grudges against Britain, Japan, the West for inflicting pain, suffering, miseries and millions of deaths in the past?

I have a lengthy discussion with ChatGPT on periods of time China was invaded and conquered by outsider e.g. the Mongols (元朝 Yuan Dynasty (1271–1368 CE)); the Manchu (清朝 Qing Dynasty (1644–1912 CE)).

In today communist China education on history, the text books treat all these emperors and controllers not as outsiders but part of Chinese races, objectively presenting their positive contribution and mistakes made. Meaning today China does not hold grudges against outsider who were invaders.

[My Question to ChatGPT]

I have the observation that today Communist China, not so much to hold grudges against Japan, Britain, the west on the suffering and miseries inflicted by them in the past, Communist China is encouraging trade, win win endeavour for mutual benefits, but Communist China is ever ready to make sure with military for no repeat of another round of "Opium wars" or "Century of Humiliation", although the west is still trying non stop propaganda and sanction here and there against China, and meddling with Taiwan issue.

[ChatGPT adjusted Answer]

Your observations highlight a nuanced perspective on how contemporary China, particularly under the Communist Party, navigates its historical grievances and international relationships. Here are some key points regarding this approach:

1. Focus on Economic Cooperation:

• Communist China emphasizes economic growth and global trade as a pathway to national strength and development. This pragmatic approach aims to build mutually beneficial relationships with other countries, including Japan, Britain, and the West.
• Initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) illustrate China's commitment to fostering international trade and investment, promoting win-win scenarios that benefit all parties involved.

2. Historical Context:

• The "Century of Humiliation" refers to the period of intervention and imperialism by Western powers and Japan in China, which has left a significant mark on Chinese collective memory. While China acknowledges this painful history, the emphasis has shifted to ensuring that such events do not recur.
• The Chinese government often references this historical context to rally domestic support and justify its policies, particularly concerning national sovereignty and territorial integrity.

3. Military Preparedness:

• China's military modernization and assertiveness in regional disputes, particularly regarding Taiwan and the South China Sea, reflect a commitment to safeguarding its national interests. The government's focus on military strength serves as a deterrent against any perceived threats from foreign powers.
• This posture aims to prevent any repeat of historical humiliations, ensuring that China is respected as a major global power and can defend its sovereignty.

4. Dealing with External Pressures:

• Despite pursuing economic cooperation, China remains vigilant against what it perceives as Western attempts to undermine its sovereignty. This includes criticism of its domestic policies, especially regarding human rights, as well as geopolitical maneuvers related to Taiwan.
• Sanctions and propaganda from Western countries are often viewed by the Chinese government as efforts to contain China’s rise, leading to a defensive posture that prioritizes national security and stability.

5. Nationalism and Identity:

• The Chinese government has fostered a sense of nationalism that encourages pride in China’s achievements and resilience. This narrative supports the idea that China has overcome historical adversities and is now a rising global power.
• The government often uses historical grievances to unify the population, presenting foreign criticism and sanctions as attempts to destabilize the country.

6. Balancing Historical Grievances with Modern Goals:

• While acknowledging historical grievances, contemporary Chinese leadership focuses on pragmatic policies that prioritize economic growth and international cooperation.
• This dual approach allows China to engage with the world while remaining vigilant against potential threats, ensuring that its sovereignty and national interests are protected.

Conclusion:

Your observation reflects a complex dynamic in contemporary Chinese foreign policy, where historical grievances inform current strategies but do not solely define them. The Chinese government seeks to balance its past with present aspirations, fostering international relationships that contribute to its economic goals while maintaining a strong defensive posture to prevent any recurrence of historical humiliations. This approach underscores China's transformation into a global power that is both assertive and engaged in international affairs.

?

Andrew,

24th Oct. 2024

https://www.360q.com