Does Australia Not See The Fusion Forest For The Nuclear Trees
https://tbivision.com/files/2022/05/Radioactive-ForestSwallowingHouse.jpg

Does Australia Not See The Fusion Forest For The Nuclear Trees

If you have not noticed, I discuss fusion energy's development in Australia and the Asia Pacific region. It has been pointed out that all Australian nuclear and renewables companies need to take note of the Australian nuclear industry itself and the business warnings the OECD and NEA red book gives.

Ted and Dutton seem to have ignored this nuclear industry advice, which new industry entrants or opposition industry advisers must pay attention to before making decisions. This advice is meant to better advise politicians and nuclear investors and provide an understanding of the effects on share markets and the price of energy production from fuel costs. If these people are unaware or they missed the OECD and NEA 2022 reports email.

The point of this article is to address the genuine concern that the Nuclear Energy Association (NEA) and the OECD in that they have only been able to guarantee economically reasonably assured and inferred nuclear fuel resources sufficient for 135 years, considering uranium requirements of about 59 200 tU (data as of 1 January 2019). If the resource can be exploited, the entire conventional resource may increase this to 250 years. Nevertheless, the rapid growth of nuclear in the coming decades will significantly change this picture.


To explain in ???????? ??????????, ???? ?????????????????? ???????? ?????? ????????????????, they ???????? ?????????????? ???? ????????. ???????? ???????????? ?????? ?????????? ???????? ???? ?????????????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ??????????, ?????????? ???????? ?????? ?????????? ???? ????????. ?????? ?????????? ?????????????? ???????????????? ??????????????????, ???????????? ?????? ?????????? ???????????????? ???? ???????????????? ??????????????????,

????????? ???? ?? ???????? ?????????????????????? ???????? ???? ????????-??????.

???? (?????? ???????????????? ?? ??????????????e ?? ???????? ) = ????????/???????????????? = ??,?? ?????? ?????? ???? ??????.

?

I don't expect this to happen rapidly, Though it's a warning if 1320 reactors do pop up:-

Ref:-the Red 2020 nuclear book.


So, if the advanced economies, including China, fail to find another energy source other than nuclear to complement renewables, they may find themselves in trouble.

Australia may be ripe for attack economically, trade-wise or by direct invasion, as we have the most readily available uranium and thorium.

I see two options that may happen in Australia.

1 The Australian Government pays for and builds nuclear reactors to work with renewables, sells the uranium and thorium lock stock and barrels to everyone, and uses the sales of Minerals Resource Rent Tax (MRRT) revenue to pay for rapid national housing and social housing development, food production, water mitigation, grid remediations, employment growth, grow energy systems for electrical power, industrial heating, and maritime and space transport propulsion and defence. Then, after 80?years, find and pay for another energy source for the nation to replace nuclear as no fuel is left, and the Australian Government needs to work with nationally saturated renewables as expansion is no longer viable.

OR

2 Sell the uranium and thorium lock stock and barrels to all and use the sales of Minerals Resource Rent Tax (MRRT) revenue to pay for the rapid development of fusion energy systems for electrical power, industrial heating, and maritime and space transport propulsion and to work with renewables, pay for rapid national housing and social housing development, agricultural production, water mitigation, grid remediations, employment growth, and defence.? Increase the current size of the Australian fusion energy industry and export its technology. Reduce grid size as power plants could be built in metropolitan areas, reduce bushfire ignition, no Australian nuclear law changes could be built earlier than nuclear, no radiation dump required, allow defence increase to borders, not nuclear plants and mines, increase the development of central and northern Australia allow an increase in agriculture in central Australia and increase settlement, help provide electrification of high-speed rail between capitals and inter cities as well as freight.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了