Documentation as Technical Debt: Why Writing It Down Isn't Always the Solution
Alessandro De Maria
VP of Platform Engineering @ Cusp.ai | Co-Founder of Kapitan | Ex DeepMind/Isomorphic Labs
In the world of software development and business operations, documentation has long been seen as a virtuous practice. Teams pride themselves on meticulously crafted wikis, elaborate process guides, and comprehensive step-by-step instructions.
But what if I told you that this approach might actually be a form of technical debt disguised as a best practice?
The Hidden Challenges of Documentation
Documentation suffers from several critical weaknesses:
1. The Communication Conundrum
Creating truly unambiguous documentation is incredibly challenging. You must:
2. The Discoverability Dilemma
Documentation is only useful if people can find it. Organizations struggle with:
3. The Engagement Trap
Once people read documentation, they often:
4. The Partial Execution Problem
Human nature leads to inconsistent documentation usage:
A Real-World Example: The Docker Installation Nightmare
Consider a prominent big tech company with a massive 50,000+ employee documentation page for Docker installation. The page included multiple complex steps like:
领英推荐
sudo systemctl stop docker
sudo ip link set docker0 down
sudo ip link del docker0
Along with intricate instructions for updating /etc/docker/daemon.json and navigating various installation scenarios. The documentation spanned multiple sections with at least 9 different command blocks, and a huge troubleshooting section.
The reality? These elaborate instructions were a clear sign of a broken process. By contrast, a simple automation script could resolve all these complexities in minutes.
The Power of Controlled Entry Points: Nudging Through Automation
One of the most overlooked advantages of automation is the ability to strategically guide user behavior at the point of entry. When you control the entry point of a process, you gain unprecedented power to:
Strategic Process Steering
Imagine a documentation page telling 50,000 employees to manually upgrade a tool. The result? Chaos. Inconsistent adoption, support nightmares, and significant productivity loss. In contrast, an automated entry point allows you to:
The Alternative: Continuous Simplification
Instead of documenting, focus on:
Conclusion
Technical documentation isn't inherently bad. But treating it as a primary solution rather than a last resort is a form of technical debt. True innovation comes from simplification, automation, and creating systems so intuitive that they require no explanation.
Thoughts? ??
Have you encountered similar documentation challenges? How are you transforming complex processes in your organization?
Share your experiences in the comments! Let's challenge the status quo of over-documentation and push towards more intelligent, automated solutions.
#TechnicalDebt #ProcessAutomation #SoftwareDevelopment #OrganizationalChange
Engineering Leader | Gen AI | B2B SaaS
5 天前Alessandro De Maria interesting take. I'd agree that any sort of automation would be superior to documentation (and also reduce toil), but there's plenty of things that are difficult to automate! LLM technology is making it easier to generate & maintain documentation and the conversational interface makes documentation easier to interact with.
Engineering Director at Phaidra | kapitan.dev
3 个月Canned scripts will surpass any technical documentation