Do you have an AI policy?

This is a scenario we at DLA Piper per are increasingly experiencing these days:

• Your company decides that generative AI solutions are crucial for its future to avoid losing a competitive advantage against competitors.
• Your IT department approaches several providers and starts running pilot projects, claiming no compliance assessment is needed since "they are just pilots" with a few employees.
• If you're lucky, your compliance department or DPO raises legal concerns and instructs a law firm (like us) to conduct a DPIA, TIA, or an IP and AI Act compliance assessment for the AI systems the business needs to adopt.
• Your diligent lawyers run the assessment and conclude that, since artificial intelligence usage is not regulated in your company, it is hard to ensure the AI solution doesn't expose processed personal data to potential risks, prevents use of IP-protected content, and is fully compliant.

This story may seem imaginary, but it's not. It's the experience of most AI lawyers trying to convince their clients that without an AI policy governing artificial intelligence usage within their organization, any compliance assessment would be meaningless.

These AI lawyers need to be "creative" in finding solutions to argue that adequate protections are in place. However, we know that human errors and misbehaviors are the main source of company violations. And if there's no policy governing AI usage, potential employee misbehavior can't even be challenged.

This is why we always recommend clients to:

1. Map their current policies and operations;
2. Understand the areas where AI solutions will be mainly exploited; and
3. Implement an AI policy that: Sets rules for artificial intelligence usage within the organization Provides a process for assessing AI solutions through tools like the one available HERE, subsequent approval, and monitoring of its functioning, without creating an additional committee or function, but leveraging the current organizational model to ensure appropriate assessments are performed.

This process enables companies to exploit AI solutions to their fullest potential while implementing safeguards to protect the company's interests against potential challenges.

Do you agree with this process? What is your recommended course of action? Read more articles HERE

You can find below the articles for my team at DLA Piper on the legal news of the week from the world of innovation, enjoy them!

Podcast?

AI psychologists and the future of mental health

AI psychologists create new opportunities and future challenges, including from a legal standpoint. We discussed the topic with Reina Balestrello of Unobravo. Listen here.

Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence and intellectual property: Challenges in the fast fashion industry

A recent legal case in the US has once again brought attention to a well-known Chinese fast fashion brand, accused of systematic violation of intellectual property rights. The lawsuit was filed against various companies affiliated with the main holding, highlighting a growing problem in the sector. Read more.

Data Protection and Cybersecurity

Garante updates guidelines in relation to retention of employees’ email metadata

The Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante) has updated the guidelines on the email management computer programs and services in the work context and metadata processing, following a public consultation that began on 16 March 2024. Read more.

Intellectual Property

EU General Court declares revocation of ‘Big Mac’ trademark for chicken goods?

In its recent judgment of 5 June 2024 (Case T-58/23), the General Court of the European Union partially annulled the decision adopted by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), excluding the protection of the “Big Mac” trademark for chicken goods, on the basis of the submission of insufficient evidence to prove current use for those goods. Read more.

Applying the UPCA to national infringement proceedings: A recent decision from Germany

Since the UPC system came into operation, one of the most controversial issues has been the applicability of the substantive provisions of the UPCA to national litigation concerning the infringement of European patents. Read more.

Summary of the AI Act in a Legal Design Style

Here is a summary of the main terms of the EU AI Act drafted in a legal design style to immediately spot and easily remember the most relevant provisions of the first legislation on artificial intelligence. Read more

Prisca AI Compliance

Prisca AI Compliance is turn-key solution to assess the maturity of artificial intelligence systems against the AI Act, privacy regulations, intellectual property rules and much more providing a score of compliance and identifying corrective actions to be undertaken. Read more

Transfer - DLA Piper legal tech solution to support Transfer Impact Assessments

This presentation shows DLA Piper legal tech tool named "Transfer" to support our clients to perform a transfer impact assessment after the Schrems II case. Read more