Do you agree?

Do you agree?

Human beings are complicated. Each one of us comes with our own personal mini-universe of opinions, feelings and beliefs.?It is that diversity of preferences and thinking styles that helps create amazing new ideas, drives innovation, and makes a team powerful. If we all agree about everything, not much new or interesting is likely to happen.

Most of the time we all muddle?along in that clumsy soup of human diversity of?opinions,?confident with our own private and personal ideas and preferences.?We choose our own limits of what we find comfortable, what challenges us, or is beyond what we are ready to believe?or agree with. Everyone being a bit different?seems to work fine for the most part.

Then, every now and again...we have to vote on something. And despite all that diversity of thinking we suddenly become tribal, black and white, and divided - as we rationalize our binary voting choices.

The remarkable thing is that it seems?to me that we don’t just become obviously divided -?often we become?split exactly?in HALF.?

  • In the US 2000 presidential election in Florida with almost?6 million votes cast, Bush eventually?beat Gore by 537 votes.
  • In Colombia in 2016 the people were asked whether they agreed it was time to make a deal with the FARC rebels and end years?of civil war -13 million votes were cast: 49.8 % said yes, and 50.2% said no.?
  • Also in 2016, 33 million British people voted in the Brexit referendum - 52% voted to go it alone, while 48% wanted to stay in Europe.?
  • In Texas in 2018 8 million Texans voted to choose their senator - the?challenger Beto O'Rourke got 48% of the votes - but Ted Cruz kept his job with 51% of the votes.?
  • In Brazil last week 118 million Brazilians voted?- 51% for Lula, and 49% for Bolsonaro.
  • And tomorrow....?

It seems like whenever we are forced?to make a binary choice we almost spookily divide down the middle into two opposed, and often hostile, camps.

No alt text provided for this image

That means that half of us is constantly?unhappy. Half of anything is a lot of people to be living with disappointment, with our opinions and choices rejected. Factions form, divisions?deepen and the potential common ground shrinks.?

Leaders?are not?elected, or appointed, to lead only the people that agree with them. A fundamental skill of leaders?in business is to create alignment among their people and set a north star that everyone?can get behind. Smart business leaders know that innovation and great work arises from diversity of opinion.

Confident?leaders embrace ideas and opinions that differ from?their own. If companies were run with an "us and them" mentality, turnover would be high and companies would fill up with 'yes people', and creativity would stagnate.

The task of?leaders must surely be to seek out that common ground where a vast majority?of us can be happy, productive and comfortable. Is it good leadership just to further convince people that already agree with you, and further alienate and ridicule those that do not?

No alt text provided for this image

It is a sad situation when consensus and teamwork is seen as betrayal or weakness. Are you really a leader if only half your people are ready to follow you?

We live in an increasingly divided, binary, world. It is the job of our leaders to align us, to find our common ground and embrace all of our ideas. To bring us together and harness all that incredible?human diversity of thinking.

To create, not destroy. To listen, not to always talk. To unite, not to divide. To look for messy agreement that?fixes problems for the majority, rather than focus on extremes that?only work for some.

Do you agree?

Eddie Ross

Transformation Coach, Author of "Where's My Free Lunch?"

2 年

Thanks for your comments all - after another few days of hearing about elections going 49.9% v.50.1% it feels like we are just as divided as ever. One day perhaps there'll be a person or an idea that 75% of us can get behind.

Good stuff, Eddie Ross. Looking for common ground, compromising, is sometimes done at the expense of a greater good, but most of the time it's the way of making progress that benefits larger groups of people. Unfortunatelly, it's easier to divide with propaganda than to unite explaining the benefits for the involved parties. That's driving our sadly divided political scenarios, at least in many Western countries.

回复
Larraine Solomon

Global Business Leader, Chief Strategy and Operations Officer, Coach and Change Agent

2 年

Sometimes the arguments or the story that we are asked to vote on are complicated, so in the end I think it often comes down to trust. Do you believe what the leader is telling you will benefit the community they are serving, or is it for their personal gain? According to the 2022 Edelman Trust Barometer research, nearly 6 in 10 say their default tendency is to distrust something until they see evidence it is trustworthy. This is fueled by the fact that nearly one out of every two respondents view government and media as divisive forces in society. On the other hand, at 61%, business is the most trusted institution which means that the relationship that a business leader creates with their employees is especially important.

Juan Giron

Global Corporate Communications at Amadeus IT Group SA; Comms at EONA-X, Mobility, Transport & Tourism data space.

2 年

Diverse teams, diverse mindsets, diverse views. All of that enriches their leader and the company they work for. Diversity, plurality converge in One Direction, no pun intended.

回复
David Robinson

Storyteller at Amadeus - and rock god!

2 年

I generally agree. Leaders have to unite all of their team and set everyone off on the same path. Areas such as politics, though, have suffered from "footballification" in the last few years. Whatever your team does, you support it even if it's wrong. It's hard to get the fans of opposing teams to go in the same direction. Also, many times, when we ask them something in an election or referendum they vote without having the right level of knowledge to make? an informed decision. Is it ight to go for a consensus decision like this when there are experts who can show the way better?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Eddie Ross的更多文章

  • Got Rizz?

    Got Rizz?

    The Oxford English Dictionary has voted ‘rizz’ their word of the year for 2023. A social mediarized contraction of…

    8 条评论
  • Count Your Blessings

    Count Your Blessings

    At this time of year most of us gather with our families and friends, in our warm homes, to share gifts, and to…

    7 条评论
  • Click here

    Click here

    This has been exciting and interesting week. I was invited by my ex-colleague, always friend and now valued-client…

    1 条评论
  • Your time is precious

    Your time is precious

    Join a webinar by global productivity experts "Think Productive" on June 15th Benjamin Franklin said "You may delay…

    1 条评论
  • Hybrid Headaches

    Hybrid Headaches

    It's coming up for a year since Larraine Solomon and I published the findings of our research project "The Remote…

    5 条评论
  • Back to the office?

    Back to the office?

    In a new hybrid working model the office is no longer the central core of work activity, but becomes a meeting place…

    10 条评论
  • Is Remote Working good for business?

    Is Remote Working good for business?

    By Eddie Ross and Larraine Solomon Have you noticed that we live in an increasingly binary world? People hold very…

    6 条评论
  • Engaging the Remote Generation (take part in our research study)

    Engaging the Remote Generation (take part in our research study)

    By Eddie Ross in Dallas, and Larraine Solomon in London. How will the leadership of companies maintain their corporate…

    22 条评论
  • Working with a Hangover

    Working with a Hangover

    By Eddie Ross in Dallas, and Larraine Solomon in London Nobody likes working with a hangover. Most of us have been…

    14 条评论
  • Video killed the...

    Video killed the...

    I wonder how many of you reading that title, like me, immediately hear in your head the 1979 Buggles hit ‘Video killed…

    12 条评论

社区洞察