“Do what you can, with what you’ve got, where you are."
Photo: Reflection of sunset on ocean. Source: setaswall.com

“Do what you can, with what you’ve got, where you are."

What a summer!

I remember my astonishment, in the early days of COVID, when people in northern India reported that they could actually see the Himalayas for the first time in more than 30 years. One of the early markers of the new normal, as people liked to call it.

But before long we reverted swung to a newer normal. Fires across Canada. Temperature records broken around the world. Ocean waters at hot tub temperatures.

Was this the hottest July ever? Or the coolest July you’ll ever see again?

"No plans"?!

With that in mind, our last—and unusually rich and moving—Living Between Words conversation began with two assertions that we’ve been hearing a lot lately: “Nobody’s talking about…” and “There are no plans for…”

These are different yet similar. Both say as much about who’s listening—and to what—as they do about what’s “really” going on. Saying “there are no plans,” for example, for dealing with the climate crisis, is actually saying “the plans aren’t adequate, the plans aren’t working, I’m anxious about the future, I don’t know what to do”—which are assessments that generate very different sorts of conversations than “There are no plans.”

We’ve got plans coming out of our ears. Some have even been enacted. (California’s 50 year renewable energy journey, the Green New Deal plan that drove the Inflation Recovery Act, countless munical climate and resilience plans, to name a few.) It’s just none are big enough, fast enough, perfect enough, or engage committed action enough at the scale, scope, and speed we need.

Some better, more generative questions might be “Where are the plans that can capture people’s hearts and move them into action? Where are the plans that build, drive, and support the new practices that we need—personal, corporate, political—for the world we want? Where are the plans that build the political will and coalitions that can overcome the deeply entrenched obstacles that stand in our way?” Oh, and of course, “What am I doing, in my life, work, investments, and conversations, to bring these plans into sight, into action, into fruition?

I’ve long suspected that when the disruption gets bad enough, people will clamor for change. (As Abba Eban famously observed, “Men and nations do act wisely when they have exhausted all the other possibilities.”) But it will likely be too late for effective and sufficient action to avert the damage. (And the Republicans and the deniers will probably blame the Dems and the climate hawks for inaction.)

“If we still had any doubts on this point, the pseudocontroversy over the climate suffices to dispel them. There is no evidence that any major corporation has spent a penny to produce ignorance about the detection of the Higgs boson. But denying the climatic mutation is another matter entirely: financing floods in. Ignorance on the part of the public is such a precious commodity that it justifies immense investments.” – Bruno Latour

So what is to be done?

So what is to be done? Simply put (as Theodore Roosevelt quoted Squire Bill Widener): “Do what you can, with what you’ve got, where you are.”

In three key ways:

  1. Know that even though incremental steps are essential in large, complex undertakings, it wasn’t incrementalism that got humanity to the moon and back. So ask: “Are my goals sufficient to the challenges, risks and opportunities we face? Is ‘sustainability’ a worthy enough goal, when the challenge perhaps is to nurture the regenerative capacity of the living Gaian system on which all that we value depends?”
  2. Know that you every time your company makes a capital investment or commits to a supplier, every time in launches a product or makes an offer in the marketplace, every time you buy a car or a meal or a t-shirt, every time you slap a dollar or dinar, a yuan or a ruble on the counter, you’re voting for a future. Not every two or four years. Every day. So ask: “What future is this spend voting for?” (Be sure to vote in the regular elections too.)
  3. Know that the purpose of your business is not, as Milton Friedman said, to maximize returns to capital. It is, as Bank of America founder AP Giannini said, to do what the business is there to do. The returns to capital are a result, not the pupose. So ask: “what business are you really in?”

Yes, there’s lots more to say. About woke, shallow, and the ESG shuffle. About, subsidies, BSAU, and change without change. About externality-denying capitalism. And more. Tune in next time for the next exciting adventure of “The Future You Never Expected!”

(Meanwhile, if you’re more in the mood for close-in, hand-to-hand, one-on-one work, check out my Trimtab4Trimtabs? program for leaders and emerging leaders doing this work. And our Full Cycle Sustainability? program for your organization.)

Joys Gitko

Managing Director

1 年

Appreciate you sharing this, Gil!

Gil, appreciate you sharing that!

Bhavana Nissima

Lightweaver|Systems Thinker|Writer|Educator|Ethnographer

1 年

Thanks for the loosening of the soil, Gil. And one can't see Himalayas from Delhi-- irrespective of Pandemic. It is folks in a further northern state Punjab who could see it. Anyways, I get where you were going with introduction. Thanks.

Warner Chabot

Executive Director at San Francisco Estuary Institute

1 年

Thanks Gil. Please keep....(pick your analogy), "poking the bear"..."stoking the fire", "screaming from the mountain top," "whispering in our collective ears". Valuable insights....much appreciated.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Gil Friend的更多文章

  • Your Moods and This Moment

    Your Moods and This Moment

    If you've followed my work or writing for any length of time, you've probably noticed that I've written a lot recently…

    16 条评论
  • 3 things. 2 moods. 1 week.

    3 things. 2 moods. 1 week.

    Three things We have three key tasks in these times: RESIST the power grabs—In the courts, at the ballot box, in our…

    6 条评论
  • How minds change

    How minds change

    What a great call! Our topic—"How minds change” (Or "Changing how we think about change")—generated a great turnout and…

    2 条评论
  • Mapping—and moving—your mood

    Mapping—and moving—your mood

    Where do you mostly find yourself these days on this (simplified) mood map? It’s important to observe… Because your…

  • Natural Logic is 25! (Fortunately, nature's logic is timeless.)

    Natural Logic is 25! (Fortunately, nature's logic is timeless.)

    It looks like good things come in fives! Natural Logic is 25 years old today! This milestone is nestled in the midst of…

    6 条评论
  • So this A.I. & I walked into a bar…

    So this A.I. & I walked into a bar…

    …continuing from my last post, where I wrote, "yes, I've stepped into the fast-moving river of AI." As many of you…

    9 条评论
  • And speaking of mood…(yes, again)

    And speaking of mood…(yes, again)

    Yeah, I know you weren't. But I was.

    2 条评论
  • Belonging To The Living World

    Belonging To The Living World

    For years—decades—the organizing principle of my work has been How can business prosper by embedding the laws of nature…

  • "Sustainability"? Nah. What About a Business Narrative That Centers the Living World?

    "Sustainability"? Nah. What About a Business Narrative That Centers the Living World?

    Andrew Winston recently offered a wonderful post asking ChatGPT for alternatives to "the core narrative or story that…

    2 条评论
  • If "change is hard"… is "exponential change" harder? Or easier?

    If "change is hard"… is "exponential change" harder? Or easier?

    As I wrote last year, "Change is hard." It takes practice living in these climate times.

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了