Do we have the will to withstand the fallout from human rights regulation?

Do we have the will to withstand the fallout from human rights regulation?

I always say that we don’t do simple on Dial P for Procurement. This week’s topic is a perfect example. Listen here: Intent v. Effect of Uyghur Forced Labor Regulation

Most 'feel good' policies seem like a great idea at a high level. It isn’t until you dig into the details that the problems become visible.

For instance… the plight of the Uyghurs in the Xinjiang Autonomous Region of China.

A Simple Explanation:

  • The Uyghurs are a mostly Muslim Turkic ethnic group. There have been many allegations of forced labor and subsequent investigations into potential human rights violations.
  • Forced labor is bad, and Western companies – especially those with ESG programs – are naturally opposed to having their supply chains rely upon any form of modern slavery.
  • The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA), which took effect on June 21, 2022 will stop forced labor in Xinjiang by requiring exporters working in the region to prove that their goods were ethically produced.
  • Sounds good, right?

Let's try again - A Real Explanation:

  • Xinjiang provides 41% of the world’s manufacturing capacity for polysilicon, a critical material for making solar panels. Large shipments of panels have already been seized by U.S. Customs for violating the UFLPA. Without Xinjiang’s production capacity, U.S. customers could see 10 gigawatts or more of supplies delayed in 2022 (equivalent to nearly half of what the U.S. installed last year). Solar panel costs have already risen by 30% to 40%. [Source ]
  • In 2020, companies like Apple, Nike, and Coca-Cola?spoke with congress and gave feedback about the UFLPA that the Business & Human Rights Centre characterizes as trying to weaken the bill because its “ambitious requirements” would increase the cost and complexity of their supply chains. All three companies have ESG policies in place. [Source ]
  • Red dates associated with the practice of “intercropping” (a practice where who crops are grown in the same area) with Xinjiang cotton, have been found in Asian supermarkets in the Washington D.C. area (of all places). [Source ]
  • On August 31st, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Michelle Bachelet, released a report generally supporting what Western governments and human rights groups have claimed for years is taking place in Xinjiang. She released the report with just 2 minutes left in her four-year term and does not intend to seek a second term. It is unknown who will take her place. China still holds a seat on the 47-member UN Human Rights Council, the group that will review the report and recommend next steps. [Source ]

Real is what it is. If we believe that there are human rights violations taking place, we can’t look the other way and we can’t take an overly broad approach to policy enforcement and implementation. We certainly can't claim that our companies are good corporate citizens. Looking good and being good are two very different things.

The Permanent Mission of the People’s Republic of China to the United Nations Office at Geneva made the following statement in response to the United Nations report.:

“At present, Xinjiang enjoys social stability, economic development, cultural prosperity and religious harmony. People of all ethnic groups in Xinjiang are living a happy life in peace and contentment. It is the greatest human rights protection and the best human rights practice.”

That defiant positioning, plus their attempts to prevent the United Nations report from being released, do not align with Western mores, and huge questions remain:

  • Can the Western world bring their operational practices into alignment with their statements and posturing with regard to human rights?
  • Is it feasible to ensure Xinjiang-sourced products are not found in a company's supply chain?
  • Will the United Nations stand up and demand that China stop their treatment of the Uyghurs in Xinjiang? Will their demand have any teeth?
  • Are global procurement and supply chain professionals willing to stand on the wall and hold the line against human rights abuses - in Xinjiang and elsewhere?

We’re all waiting to find out. Listen to this week’s episode of Dial P for Procurement and then share your point of view here or in any of the other social media posts about the podcast.

?

Other Content Released This Week

?? The Sourcing Hero podcast Episode 81 : How to Persuade Anyone, Anytime with Simon Horton

?? Supply Chain Now University : Old Supplier Management Habits Die Hard

?? Empowering Supplier Diversity Managers to Succeed in All Economies

?? Getting the ‘People Part’ Right: A Sourcing Hero Conversation with Thomas Siersb?k Heller-Njor

https://dial-p-for-procurement.captivate.fm/listen
Rodolfo Garcia de Alba Cassaigne

Regional Category Procurement Director, US Marketing Agencies

2 年

This is a very complex problem. We in procurement, as a critical part of supply chains, are obliged to make sure that the chain won't break due to supply issues. However, we are also at the forefront of making sure that our supply partners are aligned to human rights and sustainability...an almost impossible balancing act given the limited sources of supply of certain goods. The human side must always prevail regardless of the consequences. However, if we as procurement professional do our jobs right, we need to anticipate these issues and be always developing and educating our supplier partners so this don't come to a critical breaking point. This is yet another great example of how strategic and important the procurement/strategic sourcing discipline has become, specially after the pandemic and the long awaited world watch for sustainability and human rights.

David Loseby MCIOB Chtr'd FAPM FCMI FCIPS Chtr'd FRSA MIoD FICW

CPO, Professor, Editor in Chief, Advisor & NED (Pracademic)

2 年

Kelly Barner a great post as ever and hits at the raw truth of the situation and removes the "ignorance of the real issue". P&SCM leaders need to recognise these issues and face into them as I know many are,but this needs to be a colelctive plan with some collective collaboarion through a structured programme to shift the dial (pardon the reference). Consistent and structured approaches to these issues must be the only way forward with absolute transparency and there are now suficient digital solutions and platforms to enable this (TealBook EcoVadis Suppeco and more). Stephany Lapierre Pierre-Francois Thaler Sheldon Mydat James Meads The Sustainable Procurement Pledge #esg #humanrights #forcedlabour #procurement

Bill Rochfort

Director, Co-Founder at SecurCapital

2 年

Excellent summary and questions on this profound issue - thanks Kelly

To check out more great content from Kelly Barner on Dial P - or to subscribe! - click here: https://supplychainnow.com/program/dial-p-for-procurement/

The #ProcurementBuzz is a weekly LinkedIn #newsletter from Kelly Barner that combines thought leadership and the latest content to help you elevate your impact. Subscribe here: https://www.dhirubhai.net/newsletters/the-procurement-buzz-6895142546301960193

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Kelly Barner的更多文章

  • Can food safety inspectors self inspect?

    Can food safety inspectors self inspect?

    Between July and September 2024, a high profile listeria outbreak led to the death of 10 people and the hospitalization…

    11 条评论
  • Looking for 'No' in Supply Chain Decision Making

    Looking for 'No' in Supply Chain Decision Making

    ““No” has a lot of skills. “No” allows the real issues to be brought forth; “No” protects people from making—and lets…

    13 条评论
  • USPS Transformation Speaks Volumes

    USPS Transformation Speaks Volumes

    The United States Postal Service is currently working its way through a 10-year transformation program dubbed…

    10 条评论
  • On Becoming a Strategic Thinker

    On Becoming a Strategic Thinker

    “Most fundamentally, strategy is about asking good questions, creating alternatives, and then making decisions about…

    11 条评论
  • Holding Our Breath: Supply Chain Impact of the 2024 Presidential Election

    Holding Our Breath: Supply Chain Impact of the 2024 Presidential Election

    "Have you fully thought this idea through?" - A longtime friend There are less than two weeks to go until the 2024 U.S.

    11 条评论
  • Four Lessons for Surviving Our ‘Brave New World’

    Four Lessons for Surviving Our ‘Brave New World’

    “O, wonder! How many goodly creatures are there here! How beauteous mankind is! O brave new world, That has such people…

    12 条评论
  • Dockworkers' Unions Try to Hold the Line on Automation

    Dockworkers' Unions Try to Hold the Line on Automation

    I think most of us were caught off guard when the East and Gulf Coast port strike was declared over after just three…

    18 条评论
  • How Labor Costs Drive Supply Chain Strategy

    How Labor Costs Drive Supply Chain Strategy

    Labor is one of the most decision-influencing costs in a supply chain. Not only does it incentivize specialization for…

    6 条评论
  • Digital Empathy: Squishy or Strategic?

    Digital Empathy: Squishy or Strategic?

    Research (not to mention empirical evidence) suggests that our record on digital transformation is questionable. A…

    19 条评论
  • Investing to Build a Viable Alternative to China

    Investing to Build a Viable Alternative to China

    It's a pretty remarkable time to be in the lobbying business and also be a trade guy. That's mainly because it's not a…

    13 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了