Do the more rare thing

We often face complicated decisions with lots of factors to them. We all struggle with these. Sometimes you can line up the factors and make a rubric for deciding. Picking a college? Well, what matters to you? Weather, academics, location, surrounding city? You can rank each of these, say, from 1 to 10, and add them up. It’s not perfect but that gives you some kind of idea of which one you like better.

That’s a good example of reducing the dimensions of a problem so that you can impose a strict ordering (metric) on it, but often that reduction doesn’t really capture the whole story. They might tie, or there might be a factor on each side that’s really strong, but it’s different in each case, and you’re back to either/or that’s fairly balanced.

However you get there, if you have that kind of otherwise balanced choice, one nice rule of thumb for breaking the tie is simply “take the option that is more rare (less common/harder to get)”. The idea is fairly simple - if the other choice is less rare/easier to get, you’re more likely to be able to reverse your decision in that direction. And also, you may not be able to get the rare option later - part of making a choice is being worried about regretting the choice, and this is a small amount of insurance against that.

This isn’t universal or foolproof by any means - sometimes it’s also hard to tell what’s “more rare”! But it can help in surprisingly many circumstances. It’s a nice external “forcing function” that gives you a way to choose without having to agonize about it too much.

Anne Stern

Engineering Leadership at Google

2 年

This post is thought-provoking. And perhaps rare choices can also offer rare learning opportunities.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Sam Schillace的更多文章

  • AI analogies and historical lessons

    AI analogies and historical lessons

    How to make sense of it all. I've decided to keep the primary posts over on Substack.

    1 条评论
  • Motion, Thought, Systems and AI

    Motion, Thought, Systems and AI

    In which I ponder how motion is like thought, why LLMs are like early steam engines (hitting things and pumping water),…

    4 条评论
  • Looking back at the Schillace "laws"

    Looking back at the Schillace "laws"

    Way back in, I think, March or so of 2023, after I’d spent a little while trying to build things with GPT-4, I wrote…

    5 条评论
  • A strange tech parable

    A strange tech parable

    In my role at Microsoft, part of what I do is spend time with the leadership team that runs M365, Office, and Windows…

    12 条评论
  • Simplicity, Clarity, Humility

    Simplicity, Clarity, Humility

    There is an old joke: “sorry this letter is so long, I didn’t have time to write a shorter one”. It’s funny, but it’s…

    4 条评论
  • A matter of context

    A matter of context

    It’s interesting that, as we talk about using AI more and more, the phrase we use is “human in the loop” instead of “AI…

    3 条评论
  • The tension between Chaos and Order

    The tension between Chaos and Order

    I’ve been spending the last week in Japan, meeting with makers and crafts people. as always, it’s a humbling…

    4 条评论
  • No Prize for Pessimism

    No Prize for Pessimism

    A book! I’ve been writing these letters for about 12 years now. I started writing them when I was at Box, as a way to…

    10 条评论
  • Adding Value in the Age of AI

    Adding Value in the Age of AI

    If you wrote out all possible combinations of, say, 1000 letters, the vast number of them would be nonsense. And the…

    3 条评论
  • Don't use AI to make work for humans

    Don't use AI to make work for humans

    I’ve started to notice an interesting pattern. More enlightened teams and people are using AI to get lots of work done…

    5 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了