Why Platform-Agnostic Security Tokens (PASETO) Are Gaining Traction Over JSON Web Tokens (JWT)
Silas Ogar
Blockchain Architect & Senior Software Engineer | Transforming Ideas into Decentralized Innovations | Expertise in Smart Contracts, DApps, and Scalable Backend and Mobile Solutions
Tokens are necessary in the realm of web security for secure data exchange and authentication. JSON Web Tokens (JWT) and Platform-Agnostic Security Tokens (PASETO) are popular token types. They each have different characteristics and security postures, even though their functions are comparable. This article explores the differences between JWT and PASETO in an overview and ushers in an argument for selecting PASETO over JWT.
Recently, I decided to explore deeper technical experimentation with JWT and PASETO, and in one of my upcoming videos, I will be showing how best to utilize PASETO using the Go programming language.?
For those wondering what JWT and PASETO are, when you usually log into certain applications from your phone, there are traditionally some generated tokens assigned to you, that enable the sharing of data from the server to your device. It also ensures that no one else can get any information that is peculiar to you.
JSON Web Tokens (JWT)
For the purpose of transferring claims between two parties, JSON Web Tokens (JWT) are a small, secure URL. To enable digital signing, integrity protection with a Message Authentication Code (MAC), and/or encryption, the claims in a JSON Web Token (JWT) are encoded as a JSON object that is used as the payload of a JSON Web Signature (JWS) structure or as the plaintext of a JSON Web Encryption (JWE) structure.
I won't want to dwell much on the three components of a standard JWT, which are headers, payloads, and signatures, but rather on the strengths and supposed weaknesses of JWT.?
Strengths
Weaknesses?
领英推荐
Platform-Agnostic Security Tokens (PASETO)
JWTs have a secure substitute in the form of Platform-Agnostic Security Tokens (PASETO). With its default implementation of secure practices, PASETO seeks to offer the same functionality as JWT while steering clear of frequent issues.
Like JWT, PASETO also consists of three parts; the version, the purpose (either local or public, for symmetric encryption and public key signatures, respectively), and the payload, which usually has the data or claims.
Strengths
Weakness
I will choose to use PASETO in my development because it drastically lowers the possibility of implementation mistakes by imposing safe defaults. Nevertheless, the decision between JWT and PASETO? should be influenced by the particular requirements of your application and the level of technological expertise, knowledge, and resources within your team.