Do Drones Make Us Trigger Happy? Implications for the East China Sea
Jake Sotiriadis, Ph.D.
Geopolitics & Intelligence Expert I Futurist I Keynote Speaker & Author I Executive Director, Global Foresight & Strategy @Phaedrus Engineering | Atlantic Council Non-Res Senior Fellow I Advisor to US State Department
While today’s headlines are dominated by the COVID-19 pandemic, the very real threat of an unintended military incident in the East China Sea remains acute. Sustained tensions between the US and China may portend unanticipated consequences vis-à-vis the delicate security balance in this contested region. Underpinning this narrative is a concerted effort by China to “normalize” increased military activity—namely aerial and maritime incursions—into the disputed area of the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands (claimed by both China and Japan). As China makes rapid advances in developing, exporting, and fielding unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), what are the implications for increased UAV activity in the East China Sea?
In 2013, Chinese UAV flights over the disputed islands exacerbated tensions between Beijing and Tokyo, prompting calls by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to “shoot down” the UAVs in question. In fact, overall Chinese incursions into Japanese airspace nearly doubled in order of magnitude between 2012-2015. While those numbers have fallen over the past years, it is quite conceivable that Beijing could return to previous activity levels in short order.
NORMALIZING INCURSIONS, A NEW STATUS QUO?
China is following a strategy of normalizing its military activity in the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands as a means to desensitize Japan and the U.S. to the increased presence. It is a gamble that greatly mirrors Turkish military activity in the disputed aerial and maritime zones in the Aegean Sea. In the latter case, Turkey and Greece both have territorial claims to several rocky islets (not unlike the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands) that are the source of heightened military tensions. In 2015, Turkish aircraft violated Greek airspace nearly 1,500 times as part of this “normalization” strategy. Here, the United States was able to steer Turkey and Greece—both NATO members—away from open military conflict. However, in the case of the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands, Washington has clearly taken Tokyo’s side. The United States will not likely be able to dial back tensions if an unintended aerial mishap or shootdown occurs between Chinese and Japanese forces.
Figure 1: Copyright Vincent Thian - AP Photo
Conventional wisdom suggests that an increase of UAV activity in the East China Sea may not pose as serious a threat as combat air patrols by armed fighter aircraft. But the employment of unmanned aerial vehicles—that are increasingly weaponized—within disputed zones such as the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands complicates political and military efforts to enforce “norms” of aerial sovereignty. Unlike traditional aircraft, UAVs are vastly more difficult to detect. The consequences of destroying enemy UAVs are also subject to different legal interpretations. In contemporary practice, it is difficult for a government to respond with potentially disproportionate military or political action based on the loss of an “unmanned” asset. This reality emboldens armed forces to take offensive action, rather than avoiding escalation, as is generally the case when human lives are at stake.
Returning to the previous example, tensions in the Aegean Sea may shed light on how events could develop in the East China Sea. Interestingly, the loss of both Greek and Turkish fighter aircraft and pilots due to “dogfights” in the Aegean did not result in full blown military conflict. While tensions initially increased, the loss of human life actually compelled negotiation and bargaining. The removal of this element via unmanned systems may in fact have the opposite effect. As China and other regional actors develop and acquire UAVs—but also improve command, control, communications, and intelligence networks—enforcing traditional norms of aerial sovereignty will become increasingly difficult. China’s declared intent to enforce its self-proclaimed air defense identification zone (ADIZ) encompassing the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands only raises the probability of heightened UAV activity in the region.
A report by the Project 2049 Institute warns, rather ominously, of a “short, sharp war initiated by China” over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands. Lending credence to the complexity that UAVs introduce to the disputed zone, the report also states: “given the dramatic increase in provocative PLA air force activity and Japanese responses to them in the East China Sea . . . the likelihood for an explosive incident has risen greatly.”
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE WAY AHEAD
Figure 2: Copyright by the Financial Times, 2017
Unresolved legal issues regarding attribution and proportionality will greatly determine the operational application of UAVs over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands. The continuing development of UAV technology, in particular sensor improvements, weapon capabilities, and extended flight ranges will have sweeping effects on military operations. Diffusion of this technology and its proliferation and normalization will challenge norms of aerial sovereignty in the disputed Diaoyu/Senkaku Island region.
The weaponization of these systems by regional actors and their employment in disputed areas like the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands has significant implications:
1) They raise the probability of an unintended incident or escalation of military hostilities among regional actors;
2) They erode the ability of regional actors to detect, enforce, and maintain the aerial integrity of both legitimate and disputed airspace;
3) The lack of a human pilot may embolden military forces to take offensive actions against drone activity that would otherwise be dismissed;
To be sure, China continues to make rapid advances in developing, producing, exporting, and operating UAVs, as well as the associated command, control, communications, and intelligence networks necessary to employ these systems in a broader offensive capacity. The fallout from COVID-19 will continue to dominate headlines into the near future, but policymakers in Washington and the Indo-Asia Pacific region cannot dismiss the East China Sea tensions that simmer just below the surface.
Tags: #china #business #businessintelligence #airforce #pentagon #intelligence #future #economy #economics #innovation #futurism #internationalrelations #foreignpolicy #drones #uavs #japan #artificialintelligence #machinelearning #military
About the Author - Lt. Col. Jake Sotiriadis, Ph.D., is the Air Force’s senior futurist. His work spans the nexus of disruptive technology, geopolitical risk analysis, and strategic foresight analytics. He has served as advisor to the U.S. Ambassador to Germany, intelligence briefer to the Secretary and Chief of Staff of the Air Force, and Deputy Chief of the Weapons & Space Division at the NSA. He holds a Ph.D. in political science from the University of Hawai'i at Mānoa and master’s degrees from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, the School of Advanced Air and Space Studies, and the Air Command and Staff College.
Teaching Faculty at University of the Cumberlands
4 年Jake Sotiriadis, Ph.D. this is a great article that must take into account the psychology and age range of drone pilots and their commanders. You raised three great points that require more investigation. 1) They raise the probability of... Most of the Chinese commanders making decisions to launch UAVs may have never use such technology when they were junior officers and the tool remains new to them. However, the operators may have different psychology with using UAVs when they become senior commanders. 2) They erode the ability of... Syria has had military drones shut down in their airspace that always ends without further escalation between the parties involved. Iran shutdown American drones, launched airstrikes on US military troops stationed in Iraq, and none have escalated into full military conflict. The probably for China and Japan to escalate into a military conflict due to drone activities should be more of a diplomatic debate. 3) The lack of a human pilot... Psychologically, a brief moment of doubt exists before people commit violence against oneanother, but this brief moment of consciousness seems to evaporate once people deploy autonomous technology. Diplomacy using human-to-human contact may be helpful.
Senior All-Source Analyst | Cyber & Intelligence Integration | Exercise Planner | Multi-Domain Operations | USAF Veteran
4 年Jake Sotiriadis, Ph.D. apparent how this looming situation can easily lead to military scrimmage. Thanks for the perspective. RE
Massey Distinguished Professor | Award-winning author of "Warrior, Queen, Scientist, Activist: Gritty Women Who Bent the Arc of History" | top 0.02% scientist worldwide | creator of the 4-factor Grit Scale
4 年Very interesting. I think there is truth in the idea that human-less weapons can increase chances of escalation since no potential casualties are involved. What can you 'lose' by sending in some drones. Not sure whether the psychology of military (and political) leaders has caught up with that.
David Tait