Do Consumers Really Care About Your Brand Purpose?
Photo credit; Harvey Lee

Do Consumers Really Care About Your Brand Purpose?

Lord, I'm late to the party. The debate in broader marketing circles about the effectiveness of brand purpose has been a polarising topic for years now.?

In a 2021 study, Peter Field's analysis demonstrated, quite clearly, that the average brand purpose campaign was significantly less likely to generate robust, long-term business effects when compared with ‘traditional’ non-purpose campaigns.?

So the debate around brand purpose is settled once and for all then? Hmm. Not so fast.

In a non-typical way for Field, he provided an additional but skewed view of the results, maybe to satisfy the ‘marketing politik’ or people paying for the report. However, in the end, this did little to settle the debate. Instead, it had the opposite effect by causing the discussion to rumble on and on.

It could be argued that the debate can't be won, and that any research for or against merely underlines the fact that the results are open to massive variations in interpretation. However, all the discussion and available research is based on advertising effectiveness and other factors, yet not improved profits or products.?

Come again? When was profit not essential? This product marketer would like to offer a different way to look at the effectiveness of brand purpose. Not through the lens of advertising but through the lens of consumer orientation.

In this article, I will challenge the status quo. I'll demonstrate that, ultimately, success depends on what you sell and how interested and engaged your consumers are. Also, that marketers all too often are drinking their own Kool-Aid.

What Is Brand Purpose??

The definition of brand purpose for Field’s analysis:

'A commitment articulated by a commercial brand or its parent company to goals other than improved profits or products, involving contribution towards one or more positive social impacts in the fields of health, the environment, human development, sustainable business practices, or other similar areas.'

Looking at this definition, I’d challenge that the goal should be completely detached from improved profit or products completely. If we are not seeking to improve profits or products, then what is that we are doing? What did I miss? Answers on a postcard please.

By the definition, I am not sure I see the core tenants of authenticity and creating value for customers here either.

The dictionary definition of purpose (noun) is ‘the reason for which something is done or created or for which something exists’.

Let’s break the component parts of the definition down:

  • An action (for which something is done).
  • Something has been produced (or created).
  • It’s already been done (something exists).

Now this would strongly suggest that something very tangible is happening or has happened yet many purpose statements pass as pure marketing fluff at best or in reality, baseless BS.?

Launching his strategy for Unilever last year, chief executive Alan Jope held up Hellmann’s mayonnaise as a brand with a purpose: “Fighting against food waste — that is the purpose of Hellmann’s,” he said.

Really? Is your mayo a non-governmental org? (NGO). Hardly an authentic claim nor does it create value for customers.

All Roads Must Lead To Value Creation. Or It’s A Road To Nowhere.

Tom Roach’s analysis of brand purpose helps us ‘land’ on 3 broad types of brands that define themselves as having a purpose that we see in the marketing world:

1. ? ? Born Purposeful, often founder-led, often small, niche, usually founded with a societal purpose and where purpose goes across the whole business operation.?

2. ? ? Corporate Converts – often larger businesses which have adopted the concept of purpose more recently. They usually seem to genuinely want to make a positive difference to the world alongside making money, sometimes to correct past wrongs or just to become a better corporate citizen.?

3. ? ? Pseudo-purposeful brands – these are the ones for which purpose is just a new ad campaign claiming to try and solve an issue like gender or racial equality, or toxic masculinity or whatever the most resonant topic is that their social listening data says is trending with their demographic that month.

It’s the pseudo-purposeful brands that seem to either dominate or ruin the reputation of marketers (or both). Therefore, positioning marketing in the eyes of consumers as a shady lie factory.?

How does this lead us to value creation? Are we so woke we have forgotten what our job is? If anyone needs a reminder; it’s to sell things.

If we are not creating value for customers, we’re not doing our job. Therefore, we must look through the lens of the building blocks below and be able to answer each question with honesty and humility.

No alt text provided for this image

Who You Are And What Category You Belong To Matters.

The level of importance you put on your brand as a marketer is in a different stratosphere compared to where your audience places its importance. To them, your brand barely registers.

Engagement with a brand or at product level depends on many things but we must create value for customers and be authentic with it.

If the building blocks of salience and tangibility are to play a part, and engagement means we want people to do something - even if the aim is for customers to simply think about our purpose - then we need to dig further into this area.

First let’s look at the axis. There are two:

  1. Interest – is my offering or category of interest or not?
  2. Obligation – do I really need it??

When you map this with certain categories, we can see that there’s a dynamic that plays out that you could split like this:

No alt text provided for this image

If a consumer struggles with salience and tangibility in a low interest category, then does it really matter what your purpose is? If you are in a commoditised business, does purpose matter to the degree some marketers put on it?

If your customer is battling the cost of energy, does your caring for the planet and your green credentials matter as much? Remember, for them, it’s heat or eat.

Did We Forget That Customer Orientation Wins Every Time?

Whilst companies and marketer’s high-five and back-slap each other, they run the risk of inadvertently shooting themselves in the foot.

Will ‘We are here to save the world from…’ resonate with a consumer who could not give a flying fig about you or the category you are in? Lofty unobtainable missions will be seen as verbose unsubstantiated claims that can’t be delivered.?

Lest we forget that public awareness of corporations misbehaving is high, the virtue of ‘fairness’ is a very strong value to Brits (I’d suggest most people). Therefore you have to ask yourself as a marketer, does my purpose campaign really hold water?

Could the perception of Facebook be any more toxic as an internet menace? (Unfortunately, probably). Do the public really ‘get’ your purpose when it’s revealed you managed to pay no tax on billions of dollars of profit? Or does the CEO helping themselves to obscene profits whilst their workforce struggles during a cost of living crisis, lend itself to a higher purpose?

Credibility with weary consumers is dropping quicker than an astronaut entering the earth’s atmosphere. Therefore, is purpose really going to help you?

Back To Basics.

Leave the purpose at the front door. Low interest means low engagement. Your mayonnaise does not need some lofty purpose. Mark Ritson correctly cites that bread and salad is its purpose.

In low interest categories, I am a keen champion of doing what matters as a product marketer. Consumers seek mental shortcuts and yes, brand awareness factors in the many short cuts they seek. But not a lofty unobtainable or unrealistic purpose.

There is a case that transparent purpose-driven decision making forms an incredibly deep bond with the true believers, especially for companies that were Born Purposeful. But be realistic if your category really is one of them and accept that ‘purpose’ is not the only driver of value.?

For most consumers, their purpose currently is to survive the cost-of-living crisis born by recent events. So as marketers, let’s show some humility, instead of undermining the credibility of our trade by trying to pretend our brands are something they are not.

Stay safe. Look after one another.

Harvey.

This article was first published for the Product Marketing Alliance. https://www.productmarketingalliance.com/what-is-brand-purpose-and-do-your-consumers-really-care/

Sources:




?

?


??Harvey Lee ??

Ranked #1 PMM creator ????. Follow for posts about workplace practice, culture, marketing and my journey.

2 年
回复
Melissa Garcia

Product Marketing Director I 2x Founding PMM I Content Marketing Guru I PMA Fellow I PMA Expert in Residence.

2 年

Bravo! A perfect critique on a new tactic for selling more stuff in a highly competitive and congested market. Cut through the noise with a purpose, they say! If you say you care about stuff, people will see and appreciate your humanity and come running to buy! But, brands forget, consumers aren't stupid. They're more keen than ever before to the Pseudo-purposeful brands like you mention Harvey. In my opinion, our job as product marketers is exactly what you're saying in this article, "If we are not creating value for customers, we’re not doing our job." That's why I'm so drawn to product marketing. Our stewardship is the customers. How many times have leaders attended a conference or read an article only to come back for Monday's team meeting declaring, "Ok, we need to be more purpose-driven" quickly dive into to brainstorming session about all the ways we can "show" and "differentiate" our purpose-driven messaging that is more aspirational than prudent. How can we show that we support to women? Hunger? the Environment? When is most cases, our customers' purpose is really about surviving the day to day. If all your brand can really offer is to help them do that, isn't "that" enough? Isn't that a worthy purpose?

Linda Franklin

Product Marketing | Messaging | Go-to-Market Strategy & Execution| ?? Connecting the puzzles pieces to market your product to the right audiences

2 年

What a refreshing article! (Yes, profits are necessary - why can't we say this?) My fav line "Your mayonnaise does not need some lofty purpose." (LOL!) I will think about this every time I make a sandwich.

回复
Spela Sedej ??

Product Manager @ Danfoss | Digitalization, User, Upgrade, AI, Marketing, Support | Strategic 'doer' with humor | nature lover

2 年

Harvey, Thank you for the clear segmentation and supporting it with a strong case. ....'their purpose currently is to survive.' really stands out from your article for me personally. And my punctuation after the sentence here is intentional. It truly is the purpose of the need on the consumer's side and not so much on the brand itself - PM and PMMS work on it that these two (customers' needs and brand purpose) match. And this is the point where the brand gets its revenue from. Working a lot with customers directly - for me it revealed that Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs still narrates the purpose of the consumer's purchase decisions. I would even state that the brand's purpose becomes more important or visual when stepping to a higher level of Maslow's pyramid - related to your citation of Ritson: '...that bread and salad is its purpose' which usually food store low budget brands vs. high-end brands present. A great article with strong key points that calls for further research in this field.

Chris Bain, PhD

CEO @ Player One Consulting | Games industry expert advisor in strategy, operations & marketing | Former Xbox & Accenture | Leading teams of experienced consultants to drive your growth & resolve your business issues |

2 年

100% this Harvey Lee

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了