The Dix-Hallpike Test: When Up Isn't Down and Right Isn't Left
Brian Werner, PT, MPT, Cert. MBR-L3, Cert. BPPV
Disclaimer: All posts are solely my own thoughts and do not represent those of my company - FYZICAL. They are based only on my understanding and may not be entirely accurate.
As vestibular professionals, we are intimately familiar with the Dix-Hallpike Test (DHT) and its role in diagnosing Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV). But do we need a crucial piece of the puzzle when interpreting the results and choosing the proper treatment?
The Case of the Confusing Nystagmus
Picture this: your patient and you perform a DHT to the right, exhibiting the classic upbeat, rightward torsional nystagmus. Our instinct might be to immediately diagnose the right posterior canal BPPV and perform an Epley maneuver. However, this nystagmus could be deceptive, masking a different underlying cause.
The Inhibitory Factor and Neural Tension
While excitatory nystagmus from the right posterior canal is a common culprit, we must also consider the possibility of inhibitory nystagmus originating from the left anterior semicircular canal (ASC). This isn't just a mechanical phenomenon; it's also about the neural connections between these canals.
领英推荐
Two Canals, One Nystagmus
This scenario highlights a crucial point: two different canals can generate the same nystagmus through distinct mechanisms. The right posterior canal (excitation) and the left anterior canal (inhibition) can contribute to the upbeat, rightward torsional nystagmus, reflecting the underlying neural tension within the LARP plane.
Diagnostic Considerations
This complexity demands a more nuanced approach to BPPV diagnosis:
Targeted Treatment: The Key to Success
Accurate diagnosis is only the first step. The key to successful BPPV management is appropriately treating the right canal. This targeted approach ensures effective treatment and instills confidence in both patient and clinician.
The Takeaway
By recognizing the potential for inhibitory nystagmus, the involvement of multiple canals, the neural interplay within the LARP plane, and the need for targeted treatment, we can refine our diagnostic skills and improve patient outcomes. Let's embrace the complexity of the vestibular system and strive for a deeper understanding of BPPV.
Let's discuss it! Have you encountered cases where the nystagmus didn't match the expected canal involvement? Please feel free to share your experiences and insights in the comments below. Your contributions will enrich our knowledge and foster community and collaboration among vestibular professionals.
Rééducateur vestibulaire
1 周Intellectually interesting reflection. But I think that this type of case is statistically exceptional. However, in the event of failure of our Epley or Sémont maneuvers, we must ask ourselves this kind of question. Vertigo must never be routine and trivialized, even for the simplest in appearance.
Clinical Assistant Professor @ Duke-NUS Medical School | Doctor of Audiology
3 周In theory definitely possible but I wonder how many true anterior canal cases are there, when in upright position, gravity will “pull everything down”. Also to be inhibitory, the crystals must result in Ampullopetal flow of the anterior canal! Bppv is interesting indeed as there are a lot of theories surrounding this condition.