Distribution of digital site data during tendering is a must!
David Kinlan
I help ensure your civil, construction & marine infrastructure project's are delivered on time, within budget & with minimal risk.
In feedback after giving a webinar on site investigation and ground conditions claims there was one major recurring theme in the questions which multiple participants raised I do think is worth addressing. That being getting digital ground data from the client as part of the tender submission process.
This issue gets little publicity however many people are acutely aware of this recurring problem in the infrastructure industry.
A common response from clients when asked by tenderers during the tender phase for digital data is "Digital information will be provided to the contractor upon project award".
However this is basically useless to a tender as critically you need the data when tendering to input into ground modelling software. For infrastructure projects involving ground works given that projects and geology can be quite complex it is simply irresponsible to provide data rooms full of borelog PDF files with a short tender period and expect a firm tender price from the contractor. It effectively means tenderers are obliged to build in contingency sums for variances in the tender price.
The end result is ground data is being weaponised negatively between tendering contractors and clients.
I do think as a industry we need to address this issue.
It is often the case that the client has had many years collecting the digital site data yet the tendering contractor is only given a few weeks to tender and only on the basis of PDF documents.
领英推荐
Increasingly there are developments in some sectors for the proper dissemination of ground data and the pressing need for better collaboration.
Recognising that this is both a national and international scale challenge, and the need to collaborate across sectors, the British Geological Survey, Ordnance Survey and Future Cities Catapult have been working together on Project Iceberg.
Project Iceberg has the long-term aim being to help increase the viability of land for development and de-risk future investment through better use of subsurface information. More can be read about it here.
Whilst these developments at a national level are to be applauded in the meantime change from industry players is slow.
A tenderer may want to consider that a tender qualification is lodged requiring digital data being divulged that is linked to the Best and Final Offer (BAFO) during the tender review process. This to be used if a tenderer asks for critical digital data during the tendering phase and are turned down. The commercial team could look to leverage getting digital data in return for a better priced BAFO. A standard tender qualification to this effect could be developed to be included into specific tender submissions.
I do remember many years back similar issues with hydrographic data exchanges at tender time being paper plots only. As technology developed the free exchange of ascii data became the accepted norm.
I see free exchanges of environmental and ground data going the same way as hydrographic data (eventually!) but it does need to be pushed and challenged by tenderers when clients only issue PDF documents.
David Kinlan
22 January 2024
I help ensure your civil, construction & marine infrastructure project's are delivered on time, within budget & with minimal risk.
10 个月I came across the Construction Playbook published by the UK Government. They have a model clause for ground data sharing - available here - https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6312230fd3bf7f2d3d3b524b/220901-HMG-Model-Clause-Subsurface-Data-Sharing__1_.odt It says All subsurface data (including borehole construction information and any downhole geotechnical and laboratory test data) (the "Data") captured, collected or recorded by or on behalf of the Contractor in connection with the works will be reported as a raw data text file, using the Association of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists (the "AGS") file format, in addition to any other reporting format as may be requested by the Employer from time to time. The AGS file, and Data within the file, must be compliant with existing reporting standards for subsurface and geotechnical data, as outlined by the AGS. Any Data should be marked as open and not as confidential.?
Technical Director - Major Projects at AECOM
10 个月David, completely agree and the same situation occurs in Australia. Whether it be data provided in pdf logs or locked 3D ground models, it still occurs in Oz. Often compounding this issue is that this data is provided for information only and cannot be relied upon by the tenderer. The amount of time and money then required to digitise the ground data by the tenderers is significant (often at the cost to the tenderer). Ironically many clients are now requiring you to submit your ground model and tender design solution in an unlocked digital form.
Geotechnical Advisor :: MD GeoReports :: Winner 2019 EA 'Most Innovative Engineers'
10 个月Hi david, agree. Even more compelling if data owning govt agencies share high value data across multiple projects well ahead of procurement (as BGS do in UK). Recommend checking out www.civils.ai for smart conversion of PDF to 3D model.
Director Marketing and Tenders at Wasa Dredging Oy Ltd
10 个月Welcome the idea that all digital data is to be shared. However wish to add that is should be relevant and not as experienced, lets make all available, meaning several terabytes of data (design, soil, climate, surveys etc.) most of it for locations >10 or even 100 km away from the work site for a project of several 100,000 m3. Since it is all part of the same project and let the contract sort out what he needs..
I help ensure your civil, construction & marine infrastructure project's are delivered on time, within budget & with minimal risk.
10 个月Often standard industry Contracts like FIDIC, NEC and AS have a Site Data clause which require the client to provide all available site data in its possession. I often wonder whether the client just giving PDFs is playing lip service to this requirement.