The Disconnecting Point

The Disconnecting Point

How is it possible that you can’t see my point of view?

It doesn’t matter if you’re in upper management or deep in the trenches, neither side seems to be able to see the perspective of the other. Is the gap between these positions just too great? Is one side or the other incapable? Are we attempting to achieve opposite goals? Or are we speaking different languages?

Sometimes it feels like we just can’t get the other side to understand. But in that sentence is perhaps a key to the problem. “Other side”. When we are on the same team, why do we constantly view our colleagues as on our side or “the other side”. Aren’t we on the same side?

Let’s follow a typical disconnecting point discussion.

Upper management wants to manage the inventory numbers for year end (or month or quarter). So, planners and buyers are told to manually look at our Material Requirements Planning system and determine which parts that right now, if nothing changes, we can push out the purchase orders from December into January. The objective is to make the December 31st number low (inventory) and then who cares what January inventory looks like. Managing to these numbers makes sense to some because their measurement of success is based on low inventory dollars at this particular snapshot in time.  

And though this process has worked to reduce that inventory number for the last day of the year, it has never, ever actually improved the important business metric of Return on investment.

Now, those in the trenches are dismayed. Why? Because they have been put into a lose-lose scenario. Because customers are not willing to wait, and because the requirements change with little visibility, pushing to have low levels of inventory will have a negative impact to the company on some parts. The friction shows itself because Planners and Buyers have to guess which parts will cause them trouble due to this variability. So, they are forced to choose. And this conflict (internal to the buyer/planner) causes great stress, because they know that no matter what they choose, they will be wrong. And, they will be blamed for being unable to correctly guess between the impossible choices. They know that what MRP shows as a good decision today, may show as a bad decision tomorrow.

Imagine using a GPS while driving. And your GPS is run by your MRP while you are driving a car in a bit of a hurry (you’re late). What would the GPS directions look like? Here’s a sample.

GPS: Continue straight on this road until reaching the interstate. Oh, I see a faster way. You should have turned left about 500 yards ago.

You: Geez, come on. You have to let me know ahead of time.

GPS: The information got to me late. I told you as soon as I processed the new information.

You: Heavy sigh. Okay, I’ll stop and back up.

GPS: No, I see another way. And perhaps that isn’t the fastest route. Turn right this time.

You: Opposite direction from last time?

GPS: Yup, this time I’m sure. Turn right up ahead one block. No, two blocks. No, now!

You: You gotta be kidding me.

GPS: I’m sorry, I didn’t understand that. What did you say?

You: Nothing.

You can imagine the rest. The conversation could have also been the opposite. Where the driver chooses to not follow directions and the GPS gets exasperated. 

We should all have the same goal. To improve Return on Investment. Does anyone believe that manipulating the month end numbers to achieve a low inventory number for one particular day is improving ROI? Of course not. So why do businesses continue to push this practice?

Two possible answers. First, neither Management nor workers understand how to behave such that ROI is maximized. Second, they get measured with metrics that do not result in an improvement in ROI and therefore, in order to succeed, they make decisions that can negatively impact the business.

Improving systemic flow is how we can improve ROI. Think about driving in a residential block. Do you think it’s better to stop at the stop sign and then get up to 90 miles per hour, slamming on the brakes for the next stop sign? Perhaps my journey will be faster, but risk of accidents and wear and tear on the car will increase your costs due to chasing a metric that isn’t really relevant.

If we align our metrics to Flow and train our people to understand how to improve flow, then and only then will we achieve success.

Become Demand Driven

John Melbye, President, APICS Twin Cities

Doug Bell

Global SME, Planning and Scheduling at Koch Engineered Solutions (KES)

5 年

Well said and describes very accurately a typical situation, but how do you get the snap shot metric changed?It seems to be so entrenched in many companies. It's as though ROI logic is in a vacuum when you challenge the status quo metric; it's as if everyone is on autopilot and are too busy to actually think about it. The main issue I've run into is the bonus structure is based on this low inventory snap shot so a whole compensation package realignment is necessary but no one wants to open that can of worms!

回复
David H. Thoma

Founder | Interim leadership | Global Operations Executive | Board member

5 年

You had me at paragraph; Isn't (unfortunately) classic how often organizational change events neglect to review and align existing metrics to the (new) objective?

Jacqueline Travis

Purchasing Director | Global Supply Chain Professional | Six Sigma Greenbelt l Project Manager

5 年

A very thought provoking article and great reminder that when working at the same company, we are all on the same side. It is so easy to find yourself feeling as if there is your side (presumably the right side of an argument) and the other side. However, if we all are focused on achieving the same company goals we should find ourselves on the same side.

John T.

Director at Goldratt-TOC Ltd - TOC in Scotland

5 年

Good fun but do you really find people managing chaos today?

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

John Melbye, DDPP, DDOP, DDLP, DDDP, CSCP的更多文章

  • Are you ready to Unlearn?

    Are you ready to Unlearn?

    Many of us in the field of Inventory Management are chasing the same problem: Stock outs. We’re looking at problems…

    5 条评论
  • Bridge the Gap - Demand Driven MRP

    Bridge the Gap - Demand Driven MRP

    BRIDGE THE GAP One of the most well-known awareness campaigns in the world is London’s “Mind the Gap” campaign designed…

    4 条评论
  • Smelling the roses today...

    Smelling the roses today...

    Did anyone ever tell you to stop and smell the roses? I’ve always wondered exactly what is meant by that. Surely, it’s…

    5 条评论
  • Classes in Eau Claire WI and Minneapolis MN early January.

    Classes in Eau Claire WI and Minneapolis MN early January.

    The goal of every company is to improve Return on Investment. Our current efforts are not accomplishing that goal.

  • If you want to go South and you’re currently headed North, you have to change your direction.

    If you want to go South and you’re currently headed North, you have to change your direction.

    Today, I was thinking about Material Requirement Planning, the software at the heart of most manufacturing operations…

    1 条评论
  • The Training Gap

    The Training Gap

    What is the training strategy of your company? What’s that? Is there no strategy? How many of you think your company…

    5 条评论
  • 5 Steps to Supply Chain Sanity and Success

    5 Steps to Supply Chain Sanity and Success

    First, recognize that Inventory is your leverage point. Having the right inventory in the right positions is the first…

    3 条评论
  • I’ve done everything right and it’s still not working properly.

    I’ve done everything right and it’s still not working properly.

    Have you ever felt like this? You have good people, good processes, and a viable business. You’ve put in place the…

    4 条评论
  • It's time we admitted Traditional MRP can't work.

    It's time we admitted Traditional MRP can't work.

    Why do we continue to insist that we live in a world where traditional MRP works? The evidence is overwhelming that it…

    11 条评论
  • DDMRP Assumptions and Awareness

    DDMRP Assumptions and Awareness

    Assumptions and Awareness 1. Return on Investment is our company’s purpose.

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了