Dinosaurs are extinct. Your annual training plan should be too!
Let’s face it, the yearly training plan is just like that old pair of jeans you have been hanging onto since your college days. It might still squeeze in, but let’s be real - it’s worn out, uncomfortable, and long overdue for retirement. In a world where change zooms by quicker than you can blink, trying to plan your learning and development (L&D) strategy just once a year is like trying to use a flip phone in today’s tech-savvy world. It’s high time we tossed the annual plan out the window and jumped on the bandwagon of real-time, on-demand upskilling. Believe me, your learners and your wallet will be grateful.
The traditional annual training plan - where companies map out a full year’s worth of programs in January and just hope they still hit the mark by December, needs some (maybe more) attention. In a world where industries can shift rapidly, technologies are evolving faster than you can blink, and employees are looking for tailored, flexible learning experiences, the traditional methods need to evolve. Tying L&D spending to a yearly forecast means you can’t pivot when new priorities emerge.& employees see annual training as a checkbox exercise, not a meaningful growth opportunity.
The solution? A?real-time, on-demand approach?to learning that can adapt to emerging needs.
Think of it as Netflix for skills: employees get the right training, at the right time, in the right format.
Why training still matters. (Spoiler: It’s a Bigger Deal Than Ever)
Before we dive into how training needs to change, let’s tackle the big question:?Is training still relevant??The answer is a resounding?yes. Here’s why:
What is the key takeaway from this situation? Training isn’t just a “nice-to-have” - it’s a must-have for any business that wants to stay in the game. But to get it right, it needs to be adaptable and flexible.
How to Make the Shift (Without Losing Your Mind)
Transitioning to a real-time, on-demand learning model isn’t easy, but it’s essential. Here’s how organizations can make the shift:?
Step 1: Get Leadership on Board
Big changes usually kick off from the top, and that's where the CLO really steps in and makes a difference. The CLO is like the go-to person for making sure that what the business wants to achieve lines up with what people need to learn. Leaders should get that L&D isn't just something nice to have - it's actually a key player in boosting agility and innovation.
领英推荐
This is all about giving the CLO some real power: setting up a centralized L&D team that can coordinate learning throughout the organization, creating shared accountability metrics between different business units, and making learning a key part of the business, rather than just a backup function.
Step 2: Rethink Your Budget
The annual training plan often comes with a fixed budget, which is about as flexible as a brick. Instead, allocate funds dynamically based on emerging needs. The solution is putting learning budgets under the CLO's watchful eye but keeping things flexible enough to meet the needs of the different business units. Rather than having each department go off on its own with separate learning plans and budgets that don’t talk to each other, a centralized L&D team can juggle the funds and allocate them where they are needed most, keeping an eye on emerging needs and strategic priorities. ?
Think of it like a buffet: you don’t pile your plate with everything at once. You take what you need when you need it.
Step 3: Leverage Technology
Technology has definitely made learning easier to access, but just having an LXP or an AI-powered tool isn’t quite enough. It’s all about getting the right content to the right person at just the right moment.
Employees really don’t want to sift through endless course libraries. What they are looking for are learning experiences that fit their specific roles, career goals, and the challenges they face in real-time at work.
Using AI for recommendations, creating adaptive learning paths, and offering bite-sized, on-demand content can really enhance the relevance and engagement of learning. The focus should be on quality over quantity—curating learning, not just delivering it.
Step 4: Focus on Outcomes, Not Just Deliverables
In the past, L&D was often judged by the number of training hours delivered or the number of employees trained. But in the real-time learning world, organizations care more about outcomes. They want to know: Did the training solve a problem? Did it improve performance? Did it drive business results? To stay relevant, L&D needs to:
Having spent considerable time at NIIT, I have had a front-row seat to what I believe is a fascinating transformation in corporate learning. What excites me most isn't just the technology or the methods; it's seeing how the whole approach to learning has evolved to meet today's reality. We are only scratching the surface here.
The future of learning is agile, personalized, and on-demand. Organizations that cling to outdated training models risk falling behind in a world that won’t stop changing. But those who embrace this shift will be better positioned to thrive in the face of disruption. So, if you are still clinging to the annual training plan, it’s time to let it go. Embrace the future of learning and partner with those who can help you get there. Because in the age of real-time learning, the only constant is change. And the only way to keep up is to keep learning.
Championing Skills Over Labels | Learning & Development Leader | Innovating Soft Skills & English Training for a Future-Ready Workforce
1 周This article perfectly captures why annual training plans no longer work. In a world of constant change, learning must be agile, on-demand, and outcome-driven. The 'Netflix for skills' analogy is spot on ??—employees need relevant, just-in-time learning, not a rigid, pre-set curriculum. I also appreciate the focus on the impact of hours (& hours) spent in training. ?? If learning doesn’t drive real business results & positive impact ion the ROI. it’s just a checkbox exercise. Organizations that embrace flexible, personalized learning will thrive, while those stuck in outdated models risk falling behind. Thanks a ton for this insightful piece!
A Seasoned Learning & Development Practitioner | Experience Designer | Service Designer | Adoption Specialist | Innovation Facilitator
4 周While I understand and agree with the crux of the article, I am not fully on board with all the recommendations. My concerns/objections are as follows: 1. Many organizations have annual recruitment plans which require an annual budget/plans. 2. JIT learning is surely a thing but not everything can be JIT. So the traditional approach has its place. 3. Learning agility varies from industry to industry and within industry varies within roles. Learning has to be designed around the learner's reality. The learner has a day job and while learning needs to be least disruptive, it needs to be effective. I have been on both sides of the table and one thing I have heard a lot from the learners I have been responsible for is, "I don't want to make a mistake in front of the customer" & "Just tell me how to do it in plain simple language". Learning how to learn can be quite overwhelming for some.
Talent Transformation, L&D, Design Thinking (INSEAD), Fiction Writing (published author)
4 周Insightful article. Further emphasizes the importance of a structured and dynamic skills framework that captures the shift in demand for skills and complements on-demand and learning at the point of need.
NLP and Executive Coach l Global Lead Facilitator l TED X Speaker l DEI and POSH Advisor |Conference Host I Voice Artist I YouTube Presenter
1 个月Luved the perspective on ' Focus on outcomes and not just deliverables' Bhawna Kumar. Insightful read!
Public Affairs | Government Relations | International Relations | Strategy & Client Development | Talent Development
1 个月Well articulated piece that touches upon the important points and needs.This further reinforces that managers also need to know what skills and competencies that the job demands and thus the manager also need to be a part of the process and responsible for learning and development of the people she/he manages.