The Dilemma in Stephen Hawking's AI
Mohammed Helal
Efficient and experienced in technical writing and content writing.
Dr. Stephen Hawking’s Artificial Intelligence is digital, still based on predefined sequences of events or actions to move along a robot’s path or to perform certain jobs. The movement along the path still needs map based guidance setup in the matrix of what a robot should do or shouldn’t do. A challenge remains in independent locomotion and high levels of control and dynamic stability of bipedal robots and how quickly they can interact with the external and internal environments.
A complete autonomy is limited or even impossible in the digital AI. When fluidity of thinking, autonomy, cognition, imagination, self-empowerment are almost impossible in a digital AI, how can smart robots of digital artificial intelligence defeat a human race? Furthermore, when humans’ life is at stake, they beat their own miracles, they even will become a much bigger challenge for the robots on the issues of dominance and governance of this earth.
A robot has gained the technology that can read sign and motion, and walk through moving objects, avoid collisions, reach the targeted goal, and then come back to the expected place without any collision with any moving objects. But this single journey takes time for a robot, how can they supersede and defeat this smart human race?
Let’s move to the new humanoid robots who have information, vision and sound-based stabilized motion planning method – brain based on structural biology, bio-molecular expansion, and the performing body parts on advanced mechatronics. These robots don’t need any predefined matrix of actions and judgements, they can analyze their own postural responses to the motion and signs of real and virtual environments under different social conditions and requirements. However, the growth of their bio-mechanical intelligence can only continue in very intricate biomechanical designs and unparalleled mechatronic structures.
The challenge remains for the humanoid robots is the conversion and transformation of bio-molecular outcomes or signals from their bio-mechanical brains to digital waves to fit in mechatronic environments for body movement. This conversion and transformation must be precise, smooth, accurate, and fast to avoid any data loss, slow body movements, accidents, or stagnation.
A digital artificial intelligence can learn from the digital page but can’t have enough grasp and knowledge of this earth to survive and supersede humans. A bio-mechanical intelligence can because they have much higher growth and performing rate of intelligence, cognition, imagination, fluid thinking, and self-empowerment. But what is the growth rate of intelligence that can defeat the humans in their own world?
You can check it out in the above book "The Robot Invasion: A Dominion of Artificial Intelligence", where the superseding growth rate of intelligence and its performance are explained with mathematical theories and applications. The answer might surprise you.
Owner Liwal Group of Companies
7 年Thanks for the grate work, Can get the book in digital form?
Assistant to the writer at Self-employed
8 年@ P. Teague: "However, in the hands of the corrupt and criminals our world may become a far worse place than any science fiction horror has yet conceived. Without action this is the future." I agree and the world has become already. We are waiting for an explosion.
BS at Sonoma State University
9 年Very cool article. The government seens to be making strides in hiring specialized doctors and researchers to develop bionic pieces. This could very well hold true in our lifetime. There was an article just the other day re this exact subject. Computers are able to provide a function devoid of emotion. Our kind, and according to what the general environment reflects is all emotion, with intellect lingering in the background. Perhaps over time we can gain balance. Meanwhile, me think the robot on the cover is kinda cute.
Senior Technical Support Expert at ecobee
9 年Fascinating. I'm always looking for insight and speculation into this whole technological singularity thing, as it is a topic that both frightens and intrigues me. You have a unique perspective on it that I don't see all that much of.