Digital twins enabled by semantic technologies?

Digital twins enabled by semantic technologies?

What is a digital twin

Let's define a digital twin as a virtual representation of a physical object, system, or process that mirrors its real-world counterpart in a digital environment. It encompasses a variety of digital assets, including data models, simulation models, sensor data, and historical records, to create a comprehensive and dynamic representation of the physical entity.

Potential usage of Semantic Web technologies

OWL, SHACL, and SWRL can be used as enablers for developing digital twins of systems for monitoring and remote control. Here's how they can be applied in such a scenario

OWL (Web Ontology Language):

OWL can be used to define the ontology of the system being monitored and controlled. This includes defining the concepts, properties, and relationships relevant to the system, such as components, sensors, actuators, parameters, and their interdependencies.With OWL, you can create a formal representation of the system's structure and behavior, capturing its static and dynamic aspects. This ontology serves as the foundation for building the digital twin model.

SHACL (Shapes Constraint Language)

SHACL can be used to define constraints and validation rules for the data exchanged with the digital twin. For example, you can specify constraints on sensor readings, actuator commands, or system states to ensure they conform to expected formats, ranges, or relationships. By applying SHACL shapes to the data exchanged with the digital twin, you can enforce data quality, integrity, and consistency, which are crucial for reliable monitoring and control operations.

SWRL (Semantic Web Rule Language):

SWRL rules can be used to define inference rules that enable automated reasoning over the data in the digital twin. For instance, you can define rules to infer system states, detect anomalies, or trigger control actions based on sensor readings and contextual information.SWRL rules provide a mechanism for implementing complex logic and decision-making processes within the digital twin, enhancing its autonomy and adaptability to changing conditions.

All together

By leveraging OWL, SHACL, and SWRL, you can develop a robust digital twin platform for monitoring and controlling systems remotely. The OWL ontology defines the semantic model of the system, SHACL ensures the integrity and quality of data exchanged with the digital twin, and SWRL enables automated reasoning and decision-making capabilities within the twin. This integrated approach facilitates efficient and reliable monitoring, analysis, and control of complex systems from remote locations.

But are those technologies sufficient for digital twins? While OWL, SHACL, and SWRL are powerful technologies for defining ontologies, validating data, and expressing rules, they are not sufficient on their own to fully develop and exploit digital twins. Developing and exploiting digital twins typically requires a more comprehensive set of tools, techniques, and technologies, including:

  1. Data Acquisition and Integration: Digital twins rely on real-time data from sensors, IoT devices, and other sources. Tools and platforms for data acquisition, integration, and preprocessing are essential for collecting and aggregating data from diverse sources.
  2. Simulation and Modeling: Digital twins often incorporate simulation models to mimic the behavior of physical systems. Simulation tools enable the creation of dynamic models that simulate the behavior of the real-world system under different conditions.
  3. Visualization and User Interfaces: User-friendly interfaces and visualization tools are necessary for interacting with digital twins, monitoring system behavior, and analyzing data. These interfaces should provide intuitive ways to visualize data, control actuators, and interpret simulation results.
  4. Machine Learning and AI: Machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques can enhance digital twins by enabling predictive analytics, anomaly detection, and optimization. These techniques can analyze historical data, identify patterns, and make recommendations for improving system performance.
  5. Cybersecurity and Privacy: Digital twins require robust cybersecurity measures to protect against cyber threats and ensure the integrity and confidentiality of data. Security technologies such as encryption, access control, and intrusion detection are essential for safeguarding digital twin environments.
  6. Integration with IT Systems: Digital twins often need to integrate with existing IT systems, such as enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, manufacturing execution systems (MES), or asset management systems. Integration technologies and standards facilitate seamless data exchange between digital twins and other systems.
  7. Lifecycle Management: Managing the lifecycle of digital twins involves tasks such as versioning, deployment, monitoring, and maintenance. Lifecycle management tools help organizations track the evolution of digital twins, deploy new versions, and ensure their continued operation over time.

While OWL, SHACL, and SWRL can play a crucial role in defining the semantic model, validating data, and expressing rules within digital twins, they are part of a broader ecosystem of technologies and methodologies. Successful development and exploitation of digital twins require an integrated approach that encompasses data management, simulation, analytics, visualization, security, integration, and lifecycle management.

The places where those technologies can be an actual enabler are Data Acquisition and Integration , Integration with IT Systems and Lifecycle Management, i.e. all the places where it is needed to aggregate heterogeneous and distributed informational resources within a federated open environment, e.g. informational and computational systems of collaborating organisation within a Product Life Cycle Management approach (as defined by CIMDATA, cf. one of my previous article on the topic).

Let's note that there is an actual interest for semantic technologies, reflected by various initiatives:

  • Industrial Ontology Foundry
  • Several semantic and ontology related specifications at the Object Management Group
  • OntoCommon, an H2020 CSA project dedicated to the standardisation of data documentation across all domains related to materials and manufacturing.
  • The Open Manufacturing Platform (OMP)
  • ...

They will be discussed in future articles.

Don't hesitate to react, comment and share you own experience or knowledge on the topic.

If you think this article is useful, let's like and share.




Fernando MAS, PhD

CTO - VP of Technology at The CT Engineering Group

9 个月

Nicolas, interesting reflexion. Don't forget KGA in your list.

回复
Phil Taylor

Knowledge ? Architecture ? Engineering ? Cybernetics

9 个月
Thomas J?ckle

Senior Expert IoT | Senior Software Developer | Eclipse Ditto project lead | W3C WoT (Web of Things) expert

9 个月

The W3C WoT (Web of Things) provides a real open standard to describe device capabilities and also is perfectly applicable for describing digital twins. https://www.w3.org/WoT/ It utilizes JSON LD and when defining a Thing Description, one can reference other, existing ontologies.

Avi Shaked

Thinking systems, designing systems

9 个月

Make sure to check out this: https://smolang.org/ I attended a very interesting talk by Prof. Einar Broch Johnsen about this.

Lukas O.

I connect People, Processes, Data and Machines

9 个月

OMP has been switched to https://github.com/eclipse-esmf and the ontology you find here: https://github.com/eclipse-esmf/esmf-manufacturing-information-model -> More information on the Eclipse Semantic Modeling Framework can be found here: https://eclipse-esmf.github.io/esmf-documentation/index.html

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了