Digital Thread: Aligning the 8.5 Enterprise Bills of Materials
Lionel Grealou (グレアルー?リオ)
Transformation leader | return on innovation | digital strategy | value chain | connecting the dots | start-up blueprinting | managing the lifecycle of things | PLM | strategic sourcing | global talent development
Building Blocks of the Manufacturing Enterprise
Broadly speaking, the lifeblood of manufacturing companies is the?Bill of Materials?(BoM). More accurately, the lifeblood of manufacturing ARE the BoMs. As a matter of fact, there are multiple types of BoM whose usage varies throughout the engineering, manufacturing and operations / service lifecycle. These BoMs are created, managed and consumed by multiple teams and registered in multiple enterprise systems:
Simplifying the enterprise to high-level "value chains" helps segregate into three categories the different, albeit interconnected, enterprise BoMs which are also referred or aligned to "digital twins" of the physical system or set of systems that they represent:
The Product Innovation Chain: 4.5 BoMs
Most of the product information is gathered, created and matured within the product innovation chain. The associated BoMs are not only owned by engineering, but rather represent multiple sets of information which support the product development lifecycle. During that stage, there are commonly 4 principal BoMs that most manufacturers refer to, plus 1 reference BoM (hence referred here as the "0.5 BoM") which is relevant to the supplier chain (customer data provided to both design-to-print and build-to-print suppliers).
Various checks and balances are required to ensure BoM consistency and alignment throughout the product development lifecycle and change management process, especially as product requirements evolve and mature. Comparing "as-designed" (EBoM) and "as-manufactured" BoMs allows to ensure that what was designed can be built. Running automated BoM simulations to verify the above is an important step of the product configuration change management.
The Enterprise Value Chain: 3 BoMs
Product orders are translated into another type of BoM which contains all customer specifications. Another BoM includes what is actually built based on the customer order.
领英推荐
Continuously comparing "as-ordered" and "as-built" (MBoM) allows to ensure that what was ordered can be built to specification, accounting for ongoing engineering and manufacturing changes to be accounted for.
The Asset Chain: 1 BoM
Once delivered to customers, products and other enterprise assets must be maintained for operational purposes. Operational data is subject to service and maintenance changes. Based on the industry and type of product, data is modelled with one or more BoMs, which can for instance include specific MRO data as required in the aerospace industry.
Comparing "as-built" (MBoM) and "as-maintained" (SBoM) allows to perform ongoing support. Enterprise assets will be continuously maintained; this might also be included into an "as-operated" BoM based on industrial operational requirements. Logistics requirements might also be captured in "as-delivered" BoM for further traceability, etc.
There are opportunities to link "as-maintained" BoMs with in-flight or in-field data, captured for instance from machine sensors or vehicle telematics and other Internet of Things (IoT) devices. This will contribute to closed loop data alignment bridges which will continue to challenge how xPLM (PLM and ALM) and ERP systems are integrated.
Continuous BoM Alignment
The "8.5 BoMs" described above typically mature alongside each-other, in a complementary manner, at different speed and stages of the enterprise product lifecycle, while feeding each other with multiple input / output data elements across a range of functional and technical requirements (ref. the "Periodic Table of PLM"). They are aligned or synchronised so that data flows from one function to another, and from one system to another. Each BoM is ideally mastered in one system. Typically, multiple processes contribute to creating and maintaining each BoMs, whose source data is stored and managed across multiple enterprise systems.
The denomination of these BoMs might differ from one industry to another, or one business to another, based on product complexity and other business parameters such as: engineering vs manufacturing driven, design-to-spec vs build-to-print, engineering-to-order vs manufacturing-to-order, expected production volumes, level of product personalisation, type of maintenance and operations, asset type and respective lifecycle.
What are your thoughts?
Engineer | Laboratory Specialist | Researcher ??Industry 4.0 ?? Ciber-Physical Systems ?? Digital Twin
5 年Lionel Grealou (グレアルー?リオ), great article, congrats.
Account Executive @ Gartner | MBA, Business Leadership, AI
6 年Really good and clear explanation of the whole picture, Lionel. I also think the part about BoM alignment is very relevant and critical to maintain accuracy accross the different functions, as well as being a particular resource heavy task if the systems are not fully integrated. Paul Crabtree, Barbara Estefania Poblano Presas - I would recommend you having a look to these posts.
Strategic Sales | Digital Transformation |AWS CCP|MBA |LSSGB
6 年Very informatic, lot of insights. Thank you