Digital Insurgency ? 2018 Vol.1 ISBN 978-976-96220-4-3

Digital Insurgency ? 2018 Vol.1 ISBN 978-976-96220-4-3

William Anderson Gittens, Author, Cinematographer Dip.Com., Arts. B.A. Media Arts Specialists’ License Cultural?Practitioner, Publisher,?Doctoral Student of Divinity, D.D. CEO,Editor in Chief of Devgro Media Arts Services Publishing?2015

Digital InsurgencyVol.1 ? 2018 ISBN 978-976-96220-4-3

Digital Insurgency ? 2018seems to be an equivalent to a conflict that has a long-lasting environment and a changing atmosphere.

Wikipedia.org has defined the construct Insurgency as a rebellion against authority (for example, an authority recognized as such by the United Nations) when those taking part in the rebellion are not recognized as belligerents (lawful combatants). ... The nature of insurgencies is an ambiguous concept.?

There is something to this discussion that it makes it legitimate, intellectual, and it implies, it infers, global citizens are people, people have Anger, Fear, Disgust, Happiness, Sadness, Surprise, and Contempt.?

Digital Technology according to New software by California-based company Emotient can analyze a human face and pick up on subtle facial signs and even micro expressions or little flickers of emotion to tell if a person is feeling joy, sadness, surprise, anger, fear, disgust, contempt or any combination of those seven emotions.

Stathis N. Kalyvas (Corresponding Author) and Laia Balcells has argued that radical entrepreneurs with the support of the Soviet Union and its allies turned the time-honored guerrilla warfare into a much improved technology of rebellion which they call robust insurgency.

Trevin Wax?has asserted I’ve noticed something curious happen whenever a conversation turns to technology and culture change.?

People start to sound like brainwashed robots.

From the way we talk, one would think that “the future” is inevitable, that technological innovation is unquestionable, and that we no longer have the power to make choices.

Parents shake their heads and shrug their shoulders at the proliferation of smartphones and social-media accounts among young teens and children. What’s one to do? they ask. We can’t fight the future.?

The digital revolution has convinced large swaths of the American public that printing will soon disappear, publishers will stop making physical books and Bibles, and that only apps and tablets will survive.

Constant connectivity makes it possible for many Americans to envision a work environment where no one has offices anymore because everyone can teleconference.

Professors and academics feel helpless in light of the onslaught of video teaching and online chat rooms, and many wonder if flesh-and-blood, classroom-based education can survive in a digital world.

In all of these cases, people are ambivalent regarding the effect of these technological advances and cultural changes. We recognize both positive and negative aspects in these developments, as we should.

But what strikes me as silly is how many people act as if it’s pointless to weigh the good versus the bad.?

Pointless, to the extent those global citizens are helpless. There’s nothing global citizens can do to resist what’s coming. Global citizens act as if “the future” has bound and gagged us, and robbed us of our freedom.

“Well, global citizens can’t turn back the clock,” someone says. But the truth is, we can, and we do. Every fall, we turn back the clock an hour. Every four years, we enjoy an extra day.

“But the genie is out of the bottle,” another says. But global citizens can save a wish if we want to, and ask that genie to get back inside. Like a genie, technology is powerful. But we still choose to rub the lamp.

So, enough with the silly idea that every technological advance is set in stone and that cultural changes are irresistible, especially if certain habits prove detrimental to the life we want for ourselves! We can make choices in line with the vision of what global citizens want our world to be like, or at least, we can make choices in line with the vision of what we want to be like in our world.

If global citizens don’t want their homes held hostage by glowing rectangles, they can limit their time on devices, or they can do away with smartphones altogether. What king or queen has invaded your house and demanded you hand your fifth grader a smartphone? Mom and Dad, you are the authority in your castle. You are responsible for the culture you create. If a phone helps accomplish the vision of what you want your home to be, then have at it! If it doesn’t, toss it out. But don’t abdicate your kingdom and fall helplessly before the throne of Apple or Samsung.

Readers, if you love to read on your phone or on Kindle, then thank God for the accessibility of today’s e-readers. But if you prefer the smell and feel of a printed book, then please, keep your library. Even more, why not add to it? Be part of the movement that continues to surprise the publishing world—the leveling off of ebook sales and the resurgence of print (hardcover even!). A Kindle can be a terrific aid to reading; don’t let it turn into a tyrant come to burn your books.

Workers, feel free to experiment with different environments and new ideas. But treat them like experiments. Don’t assume they can’t be reconsidered or revisited or revised.

Educators, who says the world of video has to dominate the next generation? What if, in a world in which so many people access content online, the relationship with a professor or teacher and back-and-forth debate in a physical classroom becomes more valuable and not less? What if we decide that our vision for education goes far beyond the transfer of information to the formation of one’s mind and heart?

Let’s stop speaking as if we were slaves to the latest developments in technology. We can always say, “No thanks, Google Glass. We don’t want to go there.”

By Marc Goodman, Special to CNN titled How technology makes us vulnerable has argued?Never assume the newest invention is “inevitable.” Retain your humanity. Resist the robotic. You are free.We are at the dawn of an exponentially advancing technological arms race between people who are using technology for good and those who are using it for ill.

Though such battles have gone on since the beginning of time, what has changed is the pace of innovation. New technologies and capabilities are emerging so quickly, it becomes increasingly likely they will outpace the capabilities of public safety officials to respond.?

Goodman reinforces his point by indicating that the threat is serious, and the time to prepare for it is now. Technology is proliferating at an exponential pace and despite law enforcement's best efforts, cybercrime grows unabated.?

In coming years, we will witness an explosion in the use of robotics, artificial intelligence, nanotechnology and synthetic biology. There is little to suggest police will be any more prepared for these emerging threats than they were for basic cybercrimes.

Our current nation-based legal and policing paradigms have clearly not kept pace with the global threat. The paradigm shifts in crime and terrorism call for a shift to a more open and participatory form of law enforcement.

Given the rapid acceleration of technological development, any system that relies on a small, elite force of highly trained government agents may be doomed to failure. Good people in the world far outnumber those with ill intentions. But criminals and terrorists have shown their ability to take up technological arms to harm the general populace. This calls for increased vigilance on the part of ordinary citizens.

The tools to change the world are in everybody's hands. How we use them is not just up to me, it's up to all of us.

Digitization is on everyone’s mind. Companies are investing heavily in digital – the world of business is transforming.?

Disruptive technologies are drastically changing the fundamentals for how companies can reengineer their business processes and rethink their offerings. But in some companies this alarmingly seems to have replaced strategic thinking, analytical rigor and solid investment screening.?

The hype of digital has led to an investment bias to all things digital.?

Digital has become a strategy. But digital is not a strategy; it is rather a means for strategic execution and an enabler of new business models.?

Digital creates a lot of opportunities, and these opportunities need strategic governance and an investment screening process.

Tom Simonite has argued that Every so often someone invents a new way of making money on the Internet that earns wild profits, attracts countless imitators, and reshapes what it means to be online.?

Unfortunately, such a shift took place last year in the world of online crime, with the establishment of sophisticated malicious software known as ransomware as a popular and reliable business model for criminals.

After infecting a computer, perhaps via an e-mail attachment or a malicious website, ransomware automatically encrypts files, which may include precious photos, videos, and business documents, and issues an electronic ransom note. Getting those files back means paying a fee to the criminals who control the malware—and hoping they will keep their side of the bargain by decrypting them.

The money that can be made with ransomware has encouraged technical innovations. The latest ransomware requests payment via the hard-to-trace cryptocurrency?

Bitcoin and uses the anonymizing Tor network. Millions of home and business computers were infected by ransomware in 2014. Computer crime experts say the problem will only get worse, and some believe mobile devices will be the next target.

Tom Simonite has asserted that Bogdan Botezatu, made the telling point “Things are getting worse and worse, and we’re seeing more and more infections,” says Bogdan Botezatu, a senior threat analyst at security company Bitdefender.?

Botezatu’s says ransomware now takes up most of his team’s time. He generally advises victims not to pay but admits he understands why many do. “Once you fall victim to ransomware, there is absolutely no way to get your data back without paying,” says Botezatu. “But if you pay, you are only encouraging this business and funding their research and development.”

The recent rise of ransomware prompted the FBI to issue a report last month in which it warned that the crime poses a threat not only to home computer users but also to “businesses, financial institutions, government agencies, academic institutions, and other organizations.”

Bilen-Onabanjo, Sinem in an article titled Digital Insurgency joins the discourse and makes the following claims for governments; the unguarded voices on social media are now a formidable political threat.?

Sinem Bilen-Onabanjo. surveys the continent's digital activists.

With the inevitable rise of digital spaces and dissident voices with access to independent online platforms comes the insatiable appetite of undemocratic African governments to clamp down on the internet. They have valid cause for concern: Data from the 2015 How Africa Tweets report conducted by Portland shows Twitter continues to provide an important platform for political discourse in Africa, with 8.6% of 1.6bn tweets in Africa political as opposed to the UK and the US's 2%.

Used to a stranglehold on the flow of information and a monopoly of old media, such as newspapers and public broadcasters towing the party line, most African governments are struggling to control social media and messaging applications, which exercise the real power of the people through democratic opposition and mobilization of civil society and activists against poor governance.

In Zimbabwe, where the government is exploring ways to create its own social media networks that are monitored by the state, President Robert Mugabe has often accused the opposition of "abusing" social media and the internet to undermine the government.

Mukul Kesavan has argued in an article titled The sting of digital insurgencyIt tells you something about the world today that the founders of two Web-based organizations established as recently as 2004 and 2006 slugged it out for Time’s Person of the Year.?

Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg beat WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange to the top spot. Facebook’s business model depends on persuading sane people into making their personal lives public, while WikiLeaks is a non-profit organization that publishes classified and secret information about oppressive regimes from sources that it keeps anonymous.?

Facebook and WikiLeaks testify to the startling power of the Web over what we used to think of as our “real” lives,?

In this avatar, it is a rallying point for a radical politics that’s based on the premise that the workings of a state should be presumptively open and transparent, a venerable idea that has suddenly been given teeth by the digital revolution.?

Finally, corporations and states are constantly ambushed by a virtual world that we’ve come to take for granted over the last decade without stopping to think of its impact on our “offline” lives.

Jonathan Derbyshire on August 20, 2018 has claimed that Digital insurgents should take responsibility for the dramatic changes they have wreaked?

Derbyshire continues to explain that according to some of its proponents , the so-called gig economy has transformed the relationship between workers and companies.?

Contractors working for “on-demand” platforms like the ride-sharing firm Uber, the argument runs, enjoy unprecedented independence — and they like it that way.

The reality,?argues Rana Foroohar?in her column this week, is rather different. Algorithmic management techniques put more power in the hands of platform companies, not less. And the taxi business is not the only sector being disrupted in this way. The same is happening to radiologists, lawyers and accountants.

Hitherto, Uber and other digital insurgents?have entered new markets guerilla style, Rana writes, disrupting first and asking questions later.?

David Carr of The Media Equation has indicated that Tina Brown may have understood the digital insurgency that was disrupting the publishing business, but that didn’t stop her from stepping into the maw at the end of 2010, after Sidney Harman bought Newsweek.

Digital Insurgency ? 2018 as a problem is more existential than that: magazines, all kinds of them, don’t work very well in the marketplace anymore.?

Refusing a passive approach to understanding media, Insurgency On line does something more challenging and, in the end, far more rewarding.?

Intently studying genuinely revolutionary changes in the nature of mass media initiated by the massive, still-accelerating growth of electronic culture and the Internet, Insurgency On line explores the impact of the Internet upon political resistance.

There are now Insurgent companies that thrive on a culture of speed, focus and a direct connection to customers.“

Digital Mckinsey made the point in the text?Digital Reinvention has asserted Disruption” might be a cliché, but it’s hard to find a better word to describe the forces at work today.?

From the startup insurgency rattling the foundations of business to a stagnating global economy to the political upheavals that have challenged decades of accepted wisdom, corporate leaders are facing deep uncertainties.

Digital Insurgency occupies and possesses a space that challenges the idea of digital connectivity in control digital space.?

Two prominent differences in performance between the two methods are the bandwidth and the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N).?

The bandwidth of the digital system is determined, according to the Nyquist frequency, by the sample rate used. The bandwidth of an analog system is dependent on the physical capabilities of the analog circuits.?

The S/N of a digital system may be limited by the bit depth of the digitization process, but the electronic implementation of conversion circuits introduces additional noise.?

In an analog system, other natural analog noise sources exist, such as flicker noise and imperfections in the recording medium.?

Other performance differences are specific to the systems under comparison, such as the ability for more transparent filtering algorithms in digital systems and the harmonic saturation and speed variations of analog systems.

Although digital insurgency is so pervasive yet the internet is a gateway to a whole new world. It allows flexible access to information and services 24 hours a day 7 days a week.

Connectivity: keep in touch with family and friends worldwide through social media, email, Skype and Facetime. In turn using the internet will build citizen confidence and wellbeing and can reduce the feeling of isolation. Save money: provides access to a wider market and?makes it easier to compare prices. You can find the best online deals and to make more informed purchasing decisions.Save time: saves time travelling and queuing to avail of goods and services e.g. online banking, NCT booking, paying car tax.??You can now do from the convenience of your own home at a time that suits you.

Entertainment: pursue your hobbies and interests and?explore other cultures. You can also stay up to date with current affairs and catch up on TV using playback facilities.

Education:?expand your knowledge and skills, undertake online courses and facilitate your learning at your own pace.?

Conversely Digital - Disadvantages:It’s more complex so there’s more to go wrong.

It’s unforgiving if the data is damaged, tends to spoil the whole media packet. E.g. TV if too much data is lost the whole image freezes and scrambled.

Harder to fix when it does go wrong.

More expensive to fix when it goes wrong.

Your privacy is more open to monitoring and easier to be recorded without your knowledge or consent (for both criminals and government).

Less support for this technology in developing countries.

The RFID chip has been around for a while and the RFID chip is basically a tiny two-way radio, roughly the size of a grain of rice, capable of containing various types of information.?

It is inserted under the skin and when scanned, the chip can provide information such as a person’s ID number linking to a database with more detailed information about the wearer.?

Kevin Warwick, professor of cybernetics at Reading University in the UK was the first person to implant an RFID chip into his arm in 1998.?The purpose was to check whether his computer was able to wirelessly track his movements within the university.?When Applied Digital Solutions in Florida began experimenting with implanting their VeriChips – now named PositiveID – into ordinary people in the early 2000s, the technology started taking flight and received FDA approval in 2004. The pervasiveness of this nuance forces global citizens to adapt more culturally.?

At the end of the day, the gravity of this discussion certainly evoked some analysis simultaneously stirring-up an intellectual consciousness within my mind and presumably the mind of global citizen’s figuratively, philosophically, symbolically, and theoretically in their cultural space.?

Of note, Digital Insurgency ? 2018 and global citizens seems to be so inextricably linked that its convergence and pervasiveness are on parallel to the extent this nuance forces global citizens to adapt more culturally.?

The varsity of this nuance Digital Insurgency ? 2018 is seemingly influencing?global citizens’ culturally. Therefore it is highly plausiable that this nuance many be one of the reasons why they are adapting to the Digital Divide.

William Anderson Gittens, Author, Cinematographer Dip.Com., Arts. B.A. Media Arts Specialists’ License Cultural?Practitioner, Publisher,?Doctoral Student of Divinity, D.D. CEO,Editor in Chief of Devgro Media Arts Services Publishing?2015

?Works Cited

Steven Levy, Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution (New York: Penguin Books, 1984), 167-8.

Levy, Hackers, 171.

Cover image of the first issue of the People's Computer Company newsletter retrieved from the DigiBarn Computer Museum website. Accessed August 20, 2011.

Seyed Vahid Aqili, “Bridging the digital divide: The role of librarians and information professionals in the third millenium,” The Electronic Library Vol. 26 Issue 2 (2008): 229. Accessed August 12, 2011. DOI: 10.1108/02640470810864118.

Sinikka Sassi, “Cultural differentiation or social segregation? Four approaches to the digital divide,” new media & society Vol. 7 Issue 5 (2005): 685-6. DOI:10.1177/1461444805056012.

David J. Gunkel, “Second thoughts: toward a critique of the digital divide,” new media & society Vol. 5 Issue 4 (2003): 502. DOI:10.1177/146144480354003.

Tech Law Journal. “President Clinton Speech on “Digital Divide.” Accessed August 15, 2011. https://www.techlawjournal.com/agencies/slc/80605clin.htm.

Digital Divide. “A Decade of Efforts to Close the Divide.” Accessed August 15, 2011. https://igadd.org/dd/history.html.

Wikibooks. "Web 2.0 and Emerging Learning Technologies." Last modified July 29, 2009. https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Web_2.0_and_Emerging_Learning_Technologies/Digital_Divide.

One Laptop Per Child video retrieved from the One Laptop Per Child website. Accessed August 19, 2011.

Abdulhadi,Abba Kyari (2017). Aminu Saleh College of Education, Azare. Human

Development.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_development_(humanity)

Adalian, Josef (2001-12-14). "UTA TV focus the real deal". Retrieved 2016-08-18.

Andrew, Christopher and Vassili Mitrokhin. 2005. The World Was Going Our Way. The KGB and the Battle for the Third World. New York: Basic Books.

Ayres, R. William. 2000. A World Flying Apart? Violent Nationalist Conflict and the End of the Cold War. Journal of Peace Research 37, 1: 105-117.

Balcells, Laia. 2009. The Determinants of Conventional Civil Wars. Unpublished Manuscript, Yale University.

Beck, Nathaniel. 2006. Time-Series-Cross-Section Methods. Unpublished Manuscript, New York University.

Beck, Nathaniel and Jonathan Katz. 1997. “The Analysis of Binary Time-Series-Cross-Section Data and/or The Democratic Peace.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Group, Ohio State University.

Beck, Nathaniel, Katz, Jonathan N., and Richard Tucker.1998. Taking Time Seriously in Binary Time- Series Cross-Section Analysis." American Journal of Political Science 42(4):1260-1288.

Beckett, Ian F. W. 2001. Modern Insurgencies and Counter-Insurgencies. Guerrillas and their opponents since 1750. London and New York: Routledge

Beckett, Ian F.W. 1999. Encyclopedia of Guerrilla Warfare. Checkmark Books.

Bellamy, Christopher. 1990. The Evolution of Modern Land Warfare. Theory and Practice. London:

Routledge.

Berschinski, Robert, Josh Bradley, John Frick, and Bryan Groves. 2007. Back from Battle: Student

Veterans’ Perspectives on the Iraq War. Yale Journal of International Affairs 2, 2:134-142.

Block, Robert. 2004. Rwanda: RPF Men Try to Calm Fears of Returning Hutus: Tide of Refugees Swells as People in Camps, Spurred by Cholera Fears, Ignore Leaders’ Advice and Start Trek Home. The Independent, Tuesday, 2 August 1994.

Brown, Michael E. 1996. Introduction. In Michael E. Brown (ed.), The International Dimensions of Internal Conflict. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1-31.

Buhaug, Halvard and Kristian Skrede Gleditsch. 2008. Contagion or Confusion? Why Conflicts Cluster in Space. International Studies Quarterly 52, 2: 215-33.

Byman, Daniel Peter Chalk, Bruce Hoffman, William Rosenau, and David Brannan. 2001. Trends in Outside Support for Insurgent Movements. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation,

Casta?eda, Jorge. 1993. Utopia Unarmed: The Latin American Left After the Cold War. New York: Knopf."Admitting strategy error, Bush adds Iraq troops". MSNBC. January 11, 2007. Archived from the original on August 18, 2006.

Boardwell, David. And Kristin Thompson.: Film Art an introduction, fourth edition, University of Wisconsin 1993

Barthes, Roland. “Myth Today” (1972) Mythologies, London Cape?

Baskette, Floyd. K. and Jack Z. Sissors. The Art of Editing, The?

Macmillan Company, 1971.

Beach, Mark. Editing Your Newsletter. 4 ed. Published by Digest Books. 1995.?

Beasley, Augie. “Camcorders and Still Image Cameras: Superb tools” Media and Methods Vol. 30 .1, 1993.

Barrass R. (1978) Scientists must write. Chapman & Hall: London.

Bordwell, David. and Kristin, Thompson. What Editing Is. Film Art An Introduction, 4th Edition. Mc-Graw-Hill. 1993,1990,1986,1979.

Brookes I. and Marshall D. (2004) Good writing guide. Chambers: Edinburgh.

Brathwaite, Kamau Edward. Contradictory Omens. Mona: Savacou, 1974.

Brandford. Albert,??“Trading into the business of culture published.” Weekend Nation, 7 March?2006.

B. Wahlstr?m, Safety principles in I&C design, NPIC & HMIT 2015, Charlotte NC (2015).?

B. Wahlstr?m, C. Rollenhagen, Safety management – a multi-level control problem. Safety Science, 69, pp.3–17 (2014).?

B. Wahlstr?m, A. Duchac, IAEA safety principles applied to NPP instrumentation and control, NPIC & HMIT 2015, Charlotte, NC (2015).?

"Bush: we went to war on faulty intelligence". The Times. UK. December 14, 2005. Archived from the original on February 11, 2007. Retrieved June 23, 2009.?

"Bush Reviews Iraq War Strategy as Violence Mounts (Update3)". Bloomberg L.P. October 21, 2006. Archived from the original on February 11, 2007. Retrieved September 1, 2008.

"Bush on anniversary: War in Iraq must go on". CNN. March 19, 2008.

Buller, D. B., LePoire, B. A., Aune, R. K., & Eloy, S. V. (1992). "Social perceptions as mediators of the effect of speech rate similarity on compliance". Human Communication Research. 19: 286–311. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00303.x.

Burgoon, K., & Coker, D. A., & Coker, R. A. (1986). "Communicative effects of gaze behavior: A test of two contrasting explanations". Human Communication.

Cashmore, Ellis. Dictionary of Race and Ethnic Relations. 4th ed. 1999?

Routledge, an imprint of Taylor & Francis Books Lt, December 15, 1988

Cecilia Kang (October 31, 2011). "Obama names FCC commission-ers, both agency, Hill veterans". The Washington Post; Post Tech. Retrieved November 1, 2011.

C. Larman, Applying UML and patterns; an introduction to object-oriented analysis and design and iterative development, Prentice Hall (2005).?

Dyer, Richard.?The Light of the World. White ( London: Routledge 1997)

Employee Profile at the FCC". FCC. January 4, 2016. Retrieved May 10, 2017. 2016 Budget Estimate FCC Budget Estimates. FCC.?

"2008 Performance and Accountability Report" (PDF). Federal Communications Commission. September 2008.

EPRI, Operating Experience Insights on Common-Cause Failures in Digital Instrumentation and Control Systems, Report 1016731 (2008).?

Hall, Stuart. (ed) Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices ( London: Sage,1977)

Hillman, S. Richard, and Thomas J. D’Agostino. Understanding The Contemporary Caribbean: Jamaica: Ian Randle Publishers; 2003.

Hodges,John C., Mary E.Whitten, Winifred B. Horner, Suzanne S. Webb, Robert K.Miller Harbrace College Handbook eleventh edition, Harcourt Brace, Jonvanovich, Publishers,U.S.A.1990.

Horton, Robin. Patterns of Thought in Africa and the West: Cambridge University Press,1997

J. Valkonen, I. Karanta, M. Koskimies, K. Heljanko, I. Niemel?, D. Sheridan, R.E. Bloomfield, NPP Safety Automation Systems Analysis State of the Art, VTT Working Papers 94 (2008).?

J. Lahtinen, J. Valkonen, K. Bj?rkman, J. Frits, I. Niemel?, K. Heljanko, Model checking of safety-critical software in the nuclear engineering domain, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 105, pp.104-113 (2012).?

Jussi Lahtinen, Hardware failure modelling methodology for model checking, VTT-R-00213-14 (2014).?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anno_Domini?

https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/digital-divide

https://digitalartscorps.org/node/717

Steven Levy, Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution (New York: Penguin Books, 1984), 167-8.

https://562digitaldivide.wikidot.com/history-of-the-divide

Levy, Hackers, 171.

https://digitalartscorps.org/node/717

Wikibooks. "Web 2.0 and Emerging Learning Technologies." Last modified July 29, 2009.

https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Web_2.0_and_Emerging_Learning_Technologies

Digital_Divide

https://digitalartscorps.org/node/717

https://rhodes-enviroethics.wikidot.com/intrinsic-value Rolston, Holmes III. "Value in Nature?

and the Nature of Value." Environmental Ethics. Ed. Andrew Light and Holmes Rolston III.

Malden: Blackwell, 2003. 143-153.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anno_Domini?

https://techterms.com/definition/digital

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Emtage

Internet Hall of Fame - Innovator Alan Emtage". www.internethalloffame.org.

Recognizing Internet visionaries, innovators, and leaders from around the world". www.internetsociety.org.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurgency

https://techterms.com/definition/digital

https://techterms.com/definition/analog

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/divide

https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-sociology/chapter/culture-and-adaptation/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture

Harper, Douglas (2001). Online Etymology Dictionary Archived February 12, 2008, at the?

Wayback Machine..

Macionis, John J; Gerber, Linda Marie (2011). Sociology. Toronto: Pearson Prentice Hall.?

p.?53. ISBN?978-0137001613. OCLC?652430995. Archived from the original on August 18,?

2017. Retrieved May 29, 2017.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rebellion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurgency

www.cbc.ca/natureofthings/features/the-seven-universal-emotions-we-wear-on-our-face

https://www.livescience.com/42975-facial-recognition-tech-reads-emotions.html

Stathis N. Kalyvas (Corresponding Author) and Laia Balcells Department of Political Science, Yale University Yale University8?

Prospect Place, room 101New Haven, CT 06511-3516 Email: [email protected]

International System and Technologies of?

Rebellion: How the Cold War Shaped Internal Conflict?

https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevin-wax/stop-technology-holds-hostage/

https://edition.cnn.com/2012/07/29/opinion/goodman-ted-crime/index.html

https://www.sofigate.com/insight/investing-in-digital-why-strategy-matters-more

than-ever/

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/534516/holding-data-hostage-the-perfect-

internet-crime/

https://www.questia.com/magazine/1G1-471553720/digital-insurgency

https://www.livemint.com/Leisure/sBnCaxrMEDHHdamny2hJjO/The-sting-of-

digital-insurgency.html

https://www.ft.com/content/a0588886-a42d-11e8-8ecf-a7ae1beff35b

https://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/13/business/media/wondering-how-far-magazines-must-fall.html

https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/j.ctt1287t86?Kroker, Arthur, and Michael Y. Dartnell. “Foreword.” Insurgency Online: Web Activism and Global Conflict, University of Toronto Press, 2006, pp. ix-xii. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/j.ctt1287t86.3.

https://www.foundersmentality.com/2017/05/05/create-a-company-of-insurgents/

https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/mckinsey%20digital/our%20insights/digital%20reinvention/digital%20reinvention.ashx

https://www.sofigate.com/insight/investing-in-digital-why-strategy-matters-more-than-ever/

https://viconsortium.com/opinion/the-digital-age-arrived-30-years-ago/Amaziah George, founder?and editor in chief of State of the Territory News

https://viconsortium.com/opinion/the-digital-age-arrived-30-years-ago/Amaziah George, founder?and editor in chief of State of the Territory News

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_divide

https://www.businessballs.com/self-awareness/maslows-hierarchy-of-needs-2026/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Revolution

E. Schoenherr, Steven (5 May 2004). "The Digital Revolution". Archived from the original on 7 October 2008.

https://searchcio.techtarget.com/definition/Information-Age

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Revolution

https://techterms.com/definition/digital

https://www.techopedia.com/definition/23336/digital-commerce-d-commerce

https://www.techopedia.com/definition/23336/digital-commerce-d-commerce

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_divide

Have You Considered this Approach ? 2014William Anderson Gittens ? 2014Media Arts

Specialists Cultural Practitioner

First Edition ? 2014 All rights reserved.ISBN 978-976-8233-38-7

Tom, Ang.??Handling Cameras Digital Photography. (London: Published by?

Dorling Kindersley Limited 2002),15.

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=12110793

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=12110793

https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our

insights/raising-your-digital-quotient

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=12110793

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anno_Domini?

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/insurgent

https://www.diffen.com/difference/Analog_vs_Digital

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Revolution

E. Schoenherr, Steven (5 May 2004). "The Digital Revolution". Archived from the original on

7 October 2008.

Information Age".

Debjani, Roy (2014). "Cinema in the Age of Digital Revolution" (PDF).

Bojanova, Irena. "The Digital Revolution: What's on the Horizon?". IT Professional (Jan.-Feb.?

2014). 16 (1): 8–12

C. Freeman and F. Lou??, As Time Goes By: From the Industrial Revolutions to the?

Information Revolution, Oxford University Press, USA, 2002.

Online Course "Digital Technology & Social Change" (University of California), Hilbert M.,?

DT&SC 4-2: Long Waves of Social Evolution

Schumpeter, Joseph Alois (1939). Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical

Analysis of the Capitalist Process. Martino Pub. ISBN 9781578985562.

https://historyoftechnologyif.weebly.com/information-age.html

C. Perez, "Technological Revolutions, Paradigm Shifts and Socio-Institutional Change?

Archived 3 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine." in E. Reinert, Globalization, Economic?

Development and Inequality: An alternative Perspective, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2004, pp.?

217–242.?

Jump up to: a b C. Perez, "Structural change and assimilation of new technologies in the?

economic and social systems Archived 13 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine." Futures,?

vol. 15, 1983, pp. 357–375.

C. Freeman and F. Lou??, As Time Goes By: From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution, Oxford University Press, USA, 2002.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brianrashid/2017/06/13/digital-transformation-and-innovation-in-

todays-business-world/#3ec4d1ee4905

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/insurgent

Rex, Nettleford??Caribbean Cultural Identity: The Case of Jamaica. An Essay in Cultural Dynamics. (Kingston: Ian Randle, 2003),vii.

https://expertchoice.com/rational-decision-making-is-subjective-decision-making/?Rational?

Decision Making is Subjective Decision Making 16 Nov By Ernest Forman

ibid.p.189

https://gravity.video/3-reasons-why-video-editing-is-still-essential/

Woodward, Jeannette A.??Writing Research Papers: Investigating Resources In?

Cyberspace. (Lincolnwood Chicago: NTC Publishing Group, 1997),7.

Chuck Petch. and David Colborn?Grass Valley Group published in United States of America, 1991.p.23

John C.Hodges, Mary E.Whitten, Winifred B. Horner, Suzanne S. Webb, Robert K.Miller Harbrace College Handbook eleventh edition, Harcourt Brace, Jonvanovich, Publishers,U.S.A.1990 P.559.

Richard J.Walker and Robert E.Walker Exploring Photography the Goodheart-Willcox.,Inc.Publishers, U.S.A. 1983.p.178

Jeannette A.??Woodward,??Writing Research Papers: Investigating Resources In Cyberspace. (Lincolnwood Chicago: NTC Publishing Group, 1997),p.239

Scientists in Portland, Ore., just succeeded in creating the first genetically modified human embryo in the United States, according to?Technology Review. A?team led by Shoukhrat Mitalipov of?Oregon Health & Science University?is reported to “have broken new ground both in the number of embryos experimented upon and by demonstrating that it is possible to safely and efficiently correct defective genes that cause inherited diseases.”

The U.S. team’s?results follow two trials—one last year and one in April—by researchers in China?who injected genetically modified cells into cancer patients.?The?research teams?used CRISPR, a new gene-editing system derived from bacteria that?enables scientists to edit?the DNA of living organisms.

https://singularityhub.com/2017/07/31/the-era-of-human-gene-editing-is-here-what-happens-next-is-critical/ Vivek Wadhwa?

Voeux, Claire. ‘I tested the Cuban Internet for you’, RSF Report 2006. Last viewed 2009/11/04

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_analog_and_digital_recording

Chapter 21: Filter Comparison". dspguide.com. Retrieved 2012-09-13.

https://www.dccae.gov.ie/en-ie/communications/topics/Digital-Strategy/getting-citizens-online/Pages/Advantages-of-Being-

Online.aspx

https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-digital-communication

Mouffe. New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time (London:Verso, ‘Post-Marxism without apologies’,NewLeft...https://www.essex.ac.uk/methods/Courses%202004/Outlines/2U%20outline05.htm

L. Bainbridge Ironies of Automation, Automatica, 19, pp.775-779 (1983).?

Licensing of safety critical software for nuclear reactors – Common position of seven European nuclear regulators and authorised technical support organisations, BEL V, BfS, CSN, ISTec, ONR, SSM, STUK, https://www.onr.org.uk/software.pdf. (2013).

Manxymuk,John. Using Desktop Publishing To Create Newsletters, Handouts,and Webpages, A How To Do It Manual ( Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc. New York London 1997)

Meeks, Brian. and Folke Lindah (ed) New Caribbean Thought (Mona: The Press, 2001)

"Mission Not Accomplished". Time. October 6, 2003. Archived from the original on February 25, 2008. Retrieved June 23, 2009.

Nettleford. Rex.??Caribbean Cultural Identity: The Case of Jamaica. An Essay in Cultural Dynamics. (Kingston: Ian Randle, 2003).

O. B?ckstr?m, J.-E. Holmberg, M. Jockenh?vel-Barttfeld, M. Porthin, A. Taurines. Software reliability analysis for PSA, NKS-304, Nordic Nuclear Safety Research (2014).?

Petch, Chuck. and David Colborn?Grass Valley Group published in United States of America, 1991.

Pressley. Michael "Comprehension Instruction: What Works". ReadingRockets. Retrieved 2008-03-15.?

P. Savioja, Evaluating systems usability in complex work; development of a systemic usability concept to benefit control room design, VTT Science 57 (2014).?

"President George W. Bush speaks during a video teleconference with Vice President Dick Cheney, on screen, and military commanders". October 21, 2006. Archived from the original on February 11, 2007. Retrieved September 1, 2008.

Rehman,N.Sharaf. “The Power of Editing” Media and Methods. Vol. 40?(1987):12.

Rehrauer,Dr.George. The Film User’s Handbook (Publisher R.R. Bowker Company, A Xerox Education Company. 1975)

Rolston, Holmes III. "Value in Nature and the Nature of Value." Environmental Ethics. Ed. Andrew Light and Holmes Rolston III. Malden: Blackwell, 2003. 143-153.

Rothery, Katie. https://www.slideshare.net/katierothery/history-of-editing?R.C. Conant, W.R. Ashby, Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system, Int. J. Systems Sci., 1, pp.89-97 (1970)

Schifferes, Steve (March 18, 2003). "US names 'coalition of the willing'". BBC News. Archived from the original on February 25, 2008. Retrieved September 1, 2008.

Schneider, Michael (2002-09-27). "‘Surreal’s’ appeal". Retrieved 2016-08-18.

Shapiro, Ilya L.; de Berredo-Peixoto, Guilherme (2013). Lecture Notes on Newtonian Mechanics: Lessons from Modern Concepts. Springer Science & Business Media. p.?116. ISBN?1461478251. Retrieved 28 September 2016.?

"Sporadic violence doesn't deter Iraqi voters". CNN. January 31, 2005. Archived from the original on February 25, 2008. Retrieved May 31, 2008.

Stolberg, Sheryl Gay; Zeleny, Jeff (May 1, 2007). "Bush Vetoes Bill Taylor, John R. (2005). Classical Mechanics. University Science Books. pp.?17–18. ISBN?9781891389221.

Federation of Community Broadcasters 1982, Second Edition 1989, Second Printing July 1990

Walker, Richard J. and Robert E.Walker Exploring Photography the Goodheart-Willcox.,Inc.Publishers, U.S.A. 1983.

Wheeler, Tom (March 29, 2017). "How the Republicans Sold Your Privacy to Internet Providers". New York Times. Retrieved March 29, 2017.

Cyberspace. (Lincolnwood Chicago: NTC?Publishing Group, 1997),

Wolcott H. (2001) Writing up qualitative research. 2nd Edition. Sage: Thousand Oaks.?