Digital Identity and Taking Back Our Data - New Directions for Government #3
Photo Credit: Ted Eytan on Flickr [https://www.flickr.com/photos/taedc/50577153188/]

Digital Identity and Taking Back Our Data - New Directions for Government #3

This article is the third piece in a series of articles based on my February report, "New Directions for Government in the Second Era of the Digital Age: Strategy, Policy, and Action for the Biden-Harris Administration." Over the next several weeks, I will be releasing four more articles highlighting some of the key themes discussed in the 120-page report, which provides a comprehensive framework for a new US digital strategy and policy. If you haven't read the full report, you can do so here.

No alt text provided for this image

We’re over two decades into an era of digital feudalism. Under the medieval feudal system, the nobility owned vast amounts of land and could confiscate the crops their serfs grew. Today’s new asset class is data, created by us but captured and monetized by digital overlords—social media companies, search engines, online retailers, governments, and banks. In exchange, we get maybe a few relevant discounts.

We need fundamental change in society’s approach to secure our data and our digital identities. In our view, these are the priorities for government:

No alt text provided for this image
  1. Cybersecurity of US digital infrastructure is paramount. Russian hackers’ recent cyberattack on the United States was remarkable and unprecedented in its scope, sophistication, and impact. The intrusion must serve as a call for a global, coordinated effort to secure the technology-based supply chains and information systems upon which democratic societies depend.
  2. Lawmakers must recognize people’s right to their own data. Citizens primarily leave a data trail as they go about their lives. The data are so granular and multidimensional that they constitute a digital twin of sorts. People should have full custody of their digital twins as they do their bodies and their thoughts—a basic digital human right. Yet no one governs or regulates these data. America should be the first country where citizens own their data, using it to plan their lives, monetizing it, protecting their privacy and data security, and making it available as appropriate for societal reasons, such as health data in a pandemic.
  3. Every citizen needs a self-sovereign digital identity. To do this the federal government should take a page from Sir Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the Web, and seek viable digital solutions such as Berners-Lee’s Solid technology so that consumers can collect, store, and use their own data on the Web. The government should encourage the numerous efforts underway that use blockchain in protecting identity and utilizing user data confidentially. For example, as individuals recover from COVID-19 and develop verifiable immunity, they could receive a health certification to attach to their digital identity, to prove that they are safe to work in public again. In effect, the digital identity would serve as an immunity passport that expired when immunity expired.
No alt text provided for this image

4. Efforts to close the Digital Divide must accelerate. We cannot solve systemic inequality in the economy if we replicate it in cyberspace. When COVID-19 hit, many Americans could access the Internet to do what they needed to do. Yet, too many people lacked and still lack the devices, Internet services, and know-how to keep up. To close this divide, the Biden-Harris administration must prioritize low-cost services and devices and high-speed broadband to connect marginalized communities in urban and rural dead zones. Every school should have digital literacy and cyber safety courses.

5. Lawmakers must regulate the collection, use, storage, and protection of personal data. Companies must stop hoarding user data and return these assets to their owners or migrate the data to distributed storage systems and transfer control to owners. If online sites want to use these data, then they must do so transparently—no decrypting, copying, storing, or associating the data with the user’s identity—in exchange for a clear and desired user benefit.

No alt text provided for this image

Imagine having a virtual you, which collects and holds even more detailed and highly personal information and myriad measures of where you are, what you are doing, how you are functioning, and even your mood—a virtual you that gives you rather than Facebook, Amazon, and Google insights into your interests, behavior, and close connections. Now imagine what you could do with those data, perhaps to understand yourself better and improve your life and the lives of your loved ones. This power is within reach, if we reach for it.

Thank you for reading this week's newsletter. I look forward to hearing your comments.

Best regards,

Don

Celebrating by Ted Eytan, 2020, used under CC BY-SA 2.0; Sign with No Drones in Santorini, Greece: Privacy Must Be Protected by Marco Verch, 2020, used under CC BY 2.0; Developer using Laptop and Smartphone by Sora Shimazaki, 2020, used under Pexels license.

Don Tapscott, fantastic article and I'd like to share with you a recent podcast featuring?Paul Clarke CBE FREng, ex-CTO 15yrs at Ocado,?https://www.it-labs.com/paul-clarke/ where Paul talks about?#GovernmentDigitalTwins?and more which you and your network may find interesting.

回复
Perry D.

Director Business Development & Partnerships

3 年

All these city-states competed. Venice which controlled the eastern silk and spice trade was challenged by Genoa which was trying to find a sea route to the East. The Genovese were proud to be the `dominant of the seas` and produced their most famous native son, Cristoforo Colombo, (who would go on to great fame discovering America) but was a product of a competitive society in competition with Venice. One of Venice`s primary tenets was the honoring of a commercial contract, thus bound to uphold Shylock`s contract with Antonio for a pound of flesh ( until the intrepid Portia intervenes). All of this to illustrate a parallel between the Italian Renaissance city-state model, and what we are seeing developing with the FAANG model, whereby citizen-consumers become proud adherents to a city-state culture. It provides an interesting prism by which to look at and analyze, the evolution of these pivotal companies in the new digital economy. As issues of privacy, data exchange, and consent evolve, this Renaissance analogy can help us better understand and anticipate the evolution of the FAANG model.

Rhonda Okamoto

Relationship Builder and Connector|Board Member at Diversity in Blockchain, Inc.

3 年

Thanks for sharing Don Tapscott. Self-custody of digital assets is very important for people to understand. However so many just want to have some one else "taking care of their money" because they just want to take the time to learn about money or financial assets. Or find out about their digital footprint. We need to take control of our data and stop giving it away. Right now the only data we can really monetize is our DNA. #privacymanagement

Rebecca S.

AI-Driven Innovation Leader | Expert in Digital Assets, Fintech, & Cybersecurity | Advisor on Ethical AI, Fundraising & Startup Growth | Celebrate existence leave a legacy

3 年

Thanks for sharing

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Don Tapscott的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了