Digital Humanitarians

The landscape of humanitarian response has undergone a significant transformation in recent years due to the emergence of digital volunteers, often called digital humanitarians (Meier, 2015). These digital humanitarians are part of a volunteer-based movement that leverages digital tools, social media, and crowdsourcing technologies to support humanitarian operations (Crowley & Chan, 2011). The concept of digital humanitarianism gained prominence following the 2010 Haiti earthquake, marking a pivotal shift in how emergency responses are coordinated and executed (Meier, 2015).

While the Haiti earthquake serves as a watershed moment for digital humanitarianism, it is essential to note that leveraging digital volunteers as "human computing" was not entirely new. Before this event, the OSM had already demonstrated the power of crowdsourced mapping efforts (Meier, 2012). However, the scale and impact of digital humanitarian efforts during the Haiti earthquake catapulted this approach into the spotlight, giving rise to a new era of crowdsourced efforts for various humanitarian tasks (Crowley & Chan, 2011).

The rapid gathering, verification, and dissemination of information, often from far away, have become hallmarks of digital humanitarians, fundamentally altering the dynamics of emergency response. This shift has not only augmented the capabilities of traditional humanitarian organizations but also democratized the process of humanitarian aid, empowering citizens and affected populations to contribute meaningfully to response efforts (Meier, 2012, 2015).

The Rise of Digital Humanitarian Communities

In the aftermath of the Haiti earthquake in 2010, a wave of innovative digital humanitarian communities emerged, each contributing significantly to the evolution of crisis response. CrisisMappers, the Digital Humanitarian Network (DHN), the Standby Task Force (SBTF), and Humanity Road are notable among these (Gutierrez, 2019; IFRC, 2013; Resor, 2016). With their pioneering spirit, these organizations have redefined the landscape of crisis response, developing new methodologies for crisis mapping, data analysis, and information management (Norheim-Hagtun & Meier, 2010).

CrisisMappers, founded in 2009, became a global network of experts, practitioners, policymakers, technologists, and disaster responders (Meier & Leaning, 2009). Their work in leveraging mobile and web-based applications, participatory maps, aerial and satellite imagery, and advanced visualization techniques has been pivotal in providing practical crisis mapping support during numerous disasters.

The Digital Humanitarian Network (DHN), established in 2012, serves as a consortium of volunteer and technical communities (V&TCs) that act as an interface between formal humanitarian organizations and informal volunteer networks (Howden, 2009). DHN has played a crucial role in coordinating digital volunteer efforts and facilitating collaboration between traditional humanitarian actors and digital communities (Capelo et al., 2012).

The Standby Task Force (SBTF), formed in 2010, was at the forefront of online volunteer management for disaster response. SBTF's model of maintaining a network of trained digital volunteers ready to deploy at short notice has provided rapid support during crises. Their work has ranged from creating crisis maps to analyzing social media data for situational awareness (Urrutia, 2016). In 2020, the SBTF was formally dissolved (Weld, 2020).

Humanity Road, another key player in the digital humanitarian space, focused on bridging the information gap during disasters. By monitoring, analyzing, and amplifying disaster communications, Humanity Road helped improve information flow between affected communities and responders (Gambo, 2018). In March 2020, Humanity Road closed down permanently due to financial restraints caused by COVID-19 (Humanity Road, 2020).

These digital humanitarian organizations, among others, demonstrated the potential of digital volunteerism in humanitarian contexts. They have not only provided valuable support during crises but have also contributed to the development of best practices, tools, and methodologies for digital humanitarian work (Pearn et al., 2022).

A relative newcomer to the digital volunteer space, showing great potential, is the Humanitarian-To-Humanitarian (H2H) Network, which aims to provide support and services directly to humanitarians working on the ground through a network of digital volunteer organizations (Barra Martínez et al., 2022).

Challenges and Opportunities in Digital Humanitarianism

Despite digital humanitarians' contributions, their integration into the broader humanitarian ecosystem has not been without challenges. A notable disconnect has emerged between these new digital humanitarians and more traditional response organizations. This disconnect stems from differences in operational methods, data management practices, and organizational cultures (Crowley, 2013).

Traditional humanitarian organizations, accustomed to hierarchical structures and established protocols, sometimes struggled to incorporate digital volunteer groups' rapid, decentralized approaches (Sabou & Videlov, 2016). Trust, data reliability, and the potential for misinformation have been significant concerns. A persistent challenge has been how to effectively validate and utilize crowdsourced information within established humanitarian frameworks.

The role of trust is particularly crucial in the context of digital humanitarianism (Sabou & Videlov, 2016). Traditional humanitarian organizations often hesitate to rely on information from unknown volunteers, especially when making critical decisions that affect lives and resources. Establishing trust between digital volunteers and formal humanitarian actors has been an ongoing process, requiring the development of new protocols, standards, and mutual understanding (Comes et al., 2015).

Ofli et al. (2016) highlight the distinction between bound groups of volunteers and open ones. Bound volunteer groups like SBTF operated with a defined membership and clear operational protocols. These groups often undergo training and adhere to specific standards, which can help build trust with traditional humanitarian organizations. On the other hand, open volunteer groups, which allow anyone to contribute, offer the advantage of rapid scaling and diverse perspectives but may face more significant challenges regarding quality control and integration with formal response mechanisms.

Volunteerism patterns are evolving globally (IFRC Solferino Academy, 2024). Fundamental shifts include preference for causes over institutions, demand for rapid mobilization with less bureaucracy, shorter volunteer commitments, and reduced availability due to economic and personal factors. While these changes vary in pace and intensity across countries, their disruptive impact is becoming more widespread. Emerging drivers of change also include the increasing role of digitalization in volunteer management and service delivery.

The role of citizen journalists in digital humanitarian efforts has also gained prominence. During crises, individuals on the ground often become crucial real-time information sources, using social media and other digital platforms to share updates, images, and videos. This phenomenon was particularly evident after Hurricane Maria struck Puerto Rico, where citizen journalists were vital in providing situational awareness when traditional communication infrastructure was severely damaged (Gutierrez, 2019). They provided immediate, on-the-ground perspectives that can be invaluable for response planning. However, verifying the accuracy of this information and managing the potential for misinformation or unintentional harm presented significant challenges (Dailey & Starbird, 2014).

Technological Advancements and Corporate Involvement

The evolution of digital humanitarianism has been closely tied to advancements in technology. The increasing accessibility of smartphones, social media platforms, messaging, and mapping tools has enabled broader participation in digital humanitarian efforts. Additionally, the development of specialized crisis mapping platforms, data analytics tools, and ML algorithms has enhanced the capabilities of digital volunteers (Meier, 2015).

Corporate entities have, therefore, played a significant role in supporting and advancing digital humanitarian initiatives. Technology companies have provided access to satellite imagery, cloud computing resources, and advanced analytics tools, facilitating more sophisticated analysis and mapping efforts (Behl & Dutta, 2019; Burns, 2019; Tequeda & Verity, 2022). These partnerships have not only enhanced the technical capabilities of digital humanitarian groups but have also helped bridge the gap between volunteer efforts and professional disaster response operations (Burns, 2019).

The Future of Digital Humanitarianism

As digital humanitarians continue to evolve, so do the opportunities and challenges associated with their work. The emergence of "non-human humanitarians," or automated systems and algorithms designed to assist in data processing and decision-making, represents a new frontier in crisis response (Meiches, 2019). These technologies offer the potential for more rapid and comprehensive analysis of large datasets, enhancing the speed and accuracy of humanitarian responses.

The sustainability of volunteer-based initiatives remains a concern. The disbandment of some groups and the evolution of others reflect digital humanitarianism's dynamic and often precarious nature. Maintaining volunteer engagement, ensuring consistent quality of work, and securing funding for technological infrastructure are ongoing challenges (Ofli et al., 2016).

Integrating digital humanitarian efforts into formal disaster response mechanisms is still a work in progress. While progress has been made in developing guidelines for collaboration between volunteer technical communities and traditional humanitarian organizations, challenges remain in terms of standardization, data-sharing protocols, and operational integration (Capelo et al., 2012; Pearn et al., 2022).

Bibliography:

Barra Martínez, J. A., Morales-Yago, F. J., & de Lázaro-Torres, M. L. (2022). Sources of Mapping used in Humanitarian Emergencies: The Case of Ebola. Quaestiones Geographicae, 41(4), 73-87. https://doi.org/doi:10.14746/quageo-2022-0035

Behl, A., & Dutta, P. (2019). Social and financial aid for disaster relief operations using CSR and crowdfunding. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(2), 732-759. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-08-2019-0372

Burns, R. (2019). New Frontiers of Philanthro-capitalism: Digital Technologies and Humanitarianism. Antipode, 51(4), 1101-1122. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12534

Capelo, L., Chang, N., & Verity, A. (2012). Guidance for collaborating with volunteer and technical communities (Digital Humanitarian Network, Issue.

Comes, T., Vybornova, O., & Van de Walle, B. (2015). Bringing structure to the disaster data typhoon: an analysis of decision-makers’ information needs in the response to Haiyan. 2015 AAAI Spring Symposium Series,

Crowley, J. (2013). Connecting Grassroots and Government for Disaster Response (Available at SSRN 2478832, Issue. W. Center. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/connecting-grassroots-and-government-for-disaster-response

Crowley, J., & Chan, J. L. (2011). Disaster Relief 2.0: the Future of Information Sharing in Humanitarian Emergencies. OCHA. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/disaster-relief-20-future-information-sharing-humanitarian-emergencies

Dailey, D., & Starbird, K. (2014). Journalists as Crowdsourcerers: Responding to Crisis by Reporting with a Crowd. Computer Supported Cooperative Work-the Journal of Collaborative Computing and Work Practices, 23(4-6), 445-481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-014-9208-z

Gambo, N. A. (2018). Harnessing collaborative technologies in digital disaster response work: an examination of digital volunteers’ activities in processing crisis data [PHD, Brunel University London]. London, UK. https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/18084

Gutierrez, G. B. (2019). Improving the impact of digital volunteers in disaster response: user-centered design and policy approach Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. Cambridge, MA, USA. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/122221

Howden, M. (2009, 01/05/2009). How humanitarian logistics information systems can improve humanitarian supply chains: a view from the field. Proceedings of the 6th international ISCRAM conference, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Humanity Road. (2020, 1/03/2020). Humanity Road Permanently Closed Down. LinkedIn. https://www.dhirubhai.net/company/humanity-road/

IFRC. (2013). World disasters report 2013: Focus on technology and the future of humanitarian action (IFRC Disaster Report, Issue. IFRC. https://www.ifrc.org/document/world-disasters-report-2013-focus-technology-and-future-humanitarian-action

IFRC Solferino Academy. (2024, 03/07/2024). Feedback from the Network on Volunteering. IFRC Solferino Academy. https://solferinoacademy.com/feedback-from-the-network-on-volunteering/

Meiches, B. (2019). Non-human humanitarians. Review of International Studies, 45(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210518000281

Meier, P. (2012). Crisis mapping in action: How open source software and global volunteer networks are changing the world, one map at a time. Journal of map & geography libraries, 8(2), 89-100.

Meier, P. (2015). Digital humanitarians: how big data is changing the face of humanitarian response. Crc Press.

Meier, P., & Leaning, J. (2009). Applying technology to crisis mapping and early warning in humanitarian settings (Crisis Mapping Working Paper, Issue. H. University. https://hhi.harvard.edu/publications/applied-technology-crisis-mapping-and-early-warning-humanitarian

Norheim-Hagtun, I., & Meier, P. (2010). Crowdsourcing for crisis mapping in Haiti. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 5(4), 81-89.

Ofli, F., Meier, P., Imran, M., Castillo, C., Tuia, D., Rey, N., Briant, J., Millet, P., Reinhard, F., Parkan, M., & Joost, S. (2016). Combining Human Computing and Machine Learning to Make Sense of Big (Aerial) Data for Disaster Response. Big Data, 4(1), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2014.0064

Pearn, K., Jabbar, S. A., & Verity, A. (2022). A Decade Later - Reflecting on Disaster Relief 2.0. DHNetwork. https://digitalhumanitarians.com/a_decade_later_reflecting_on_disaster_relief_2_june_2022/

Resor, E. (2016). The Neo-Humanitarians: Assessing the Credibility of Organized Volunteer Crisis Mappers. Policy and Internet, 8(1), 34-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.112

Sabou, J., & Videlov, S. (2016). An Analysis on the Role of Trust in Digital Humanitarian Actor Networks. ISCRAM 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Tequeda, O., & Verity, A. (2022). Where Technology Meets Ethics - The Humanitarian Principles and Their Problematic Relationship to Technology. DHNetwork. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/where-technology-meets-ethics-humanitarian-principles-and-their-problematic-relationship-technology-september-2022

Urrutia, L. (2016). Leading digital humanitarians: An exploratory study on establishing and maintaining effective leadership roles during a crisis event in the Standby Task Force online community [Master, University of Alberta]. Alberta, Canada. https://www.academia.edu/27585705/Leading_Digital_Humanitarians_An_Exploratory_Study_on_Establishing_and_Maintaining_Effective_Leadership_Roles_during_a_Crisis_Event_in_the_Standby_Task_Force_Online_Community?f_ri=1329422

Weld, L. (2020, 22/10/2020). SBTF to dissolve. Standby Task Force. https://standbytaskforce.org/2020/10/22/sbtf-to-dissolve/