In the digital age, is there a more efficient process for standardisation and compliance?

"Complexity is the enemy of execution". - Tony Robbins

Introduction

In an era characterised by rapid technological advancement, the process of developing industry standards remains mired in traditional, often cumbersome, methodologies. Industry standards, which serve as crucial benchmarks for ensuring quality, safety, and interoperability across sectors, are typically developed by committees composed of industry experts and stakeholders. These committees deliberate extensively, striving to reach consensus on the best practices and guidelines that should be universally adopted. However, this consensus-driven approach, while thorough, is inherently slow and inflexible, often resulting in standards that are outdated by the time they are published. This inefficiency has become increasingly problematic in the digital age, where the pace of innovation far outstrips the capacity of traditional standardisation processes to keep up.

The need for more agile and responsive standardisation methods is becoming increasingly clear as industries grapple with the challenges of rapid digital transformation. This article critically examines the inefficiencies of traditional standardization processes and explores the potential for digital technologies, crowdsourcing, and open innovation to streamline and modernize these processes. By analysing the limitations of the current model and considering alternative approaches, this discussion aims to highlight the importance of evolving industry standards to better align with the fast-paced demands of the digital age.?

The article begins by exploring the inefficiencies inherent in traditional standardisation processes, drawing on examples from industry reports and academic studies. It then examines how digital transformation is being leveraged to create more efficient and responsive standards, considering both the potential benefits and challenges of this shift. The role of crowdsourcing and open innovation is also discussed as a means of democratizing and accelerating the development of standards. Finally, the article will conclude with a discussion on the need to balance the speed of innovation with the rigorous governance and quality controls that are essential to ensuring the reliability and effectiveness of industry standards.?

The Inefficiency of Traditional Standardisation Processes

The traditional process of developing industry standards is often criticised for its slow and bureaucratic nature. Typically, these standards are formulated by committees composed of representatives from various stakeholders, including industry experts, governmental bodies, and sometimes consumer groups. While this approach is designed to ensure that standards are comprehensive and widely accepted, it also leads to lengthy deliberations and extended timelines before a standard is officially published. This slow pace is increasingly seen as a significant drawback in an era where technological innovation is rapid and continuous.?

One of the primary inefficiencies of this traditional process is the significant time lag between the identification of a need for a new standard and its actual implementation. By the time a new standard is developed and agreed upon, the technology or industry practice it was designed to regulate may have already evolved, rendering the standard partially obsolete. This issue is particularly pronounced in fast-moving industries such as information technology and security management, where product lifecycles are short, and innovation is continuous. Compounding this challenge is the rapidly evolving threat landscape. Adversaries, or threat actors, are increasingly agile in adopting and exploiting new technologies, often outpacing the defensive measures dictated by existing standards. As these threat actors continually refine their tactics, techniques, and procedures, the delays inherent in the traditional standardisation process leave significant gaps in security, exposing organisations to heightened risks. As noted in the Accenture Compliance Risk Study (2022), the rapid pace of technological change, combined with the evolving nature of threats, necessitates more agile compliance and standardisation processes. Traditional methods are simply not equipped to respond swiftly enough to these dynamic challenges, leaving industries vulnerable to sophisticated and rapidly advancing security threats.

Moreover, the committee-based approach to standardisation often results in compromises that dilute the effectiveness of the standards. Since these committees are composed of representatives with diverse interests and perspectives, reaching a consensus often involves extensive negotiations and concessions. This can lead to standards that are overly broad, ambiguous, or watered down to accommodate the various interests at the table. Such compromises, while necessary to achieve agreement, can undermine the utility and clarity of the standards, making them less effective in guiding industry practices.

Furthermore, the infrequent updates to standards exacerbate the problem. Most industry standards are reviewed and revised at significant intervals, sometimes spanning several years. During this period, industries may experience significant technological advancements, regulatory changes, or shifts in consumer expectations, all of which can render existing standards inadequate. The UNIDO report on standards and digital transformation highlights the challenge of keeping standards relevant in a rapidly changing environment, emphasising the need for more frequent and responsive updates (UNIDO, 2022).

Another critical issue is the resource-intensive nature of the traditional standardisation process. Developing a new standard or revising an existing one requires substantial time, effort, and financial investment from all parties involved. This can be particularly burdensome for smaller organisations or emerging industries that may not have the resources to participate fully in the standardisation process. The result is a process that can be skewed in favour of larger, more established players, potentially stifling innovation and competition.

While the traditional process of developing industry standards has been effective in ensuring broad-based agreement and rigorous quality controls, its inefficiencies are increasingly apparent in the digital age. The slow pace of standardisation, the tendency towards diluted compromises, the infrequent updates, and the resource-intensive nature of the process all contribute to a system that struggles to keep pace with the rapid advancements in technology and industry practices. This inefficiency underscores the need for a more agile and responsive approach to standardisation, one that can better meet the demands of the modern, fast-paced world.

Digital Transformation as a Catalyst for Modernising Standards

The digital age presents a unique opportunity to fundamentally transform the standardisation process, making it more agile, responsive, and aligned with the rapid pace of technological innovation. Traditionally, the development and updating of industry standards have been time-consuming processes, often unable to keep up with the speed at which new technologies emerge. However, the integration of digital tools and platforms offers the potential to streamline this process, ensuring that standards remain relevant and effective in a fast-evolving landscape.

A significant advancement in transforming standards is a jointly led initiative by the IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) and the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), is the concept of “smart” standards. These smart standards are designed to be not only accessible to human users but also interpretable and actionable by machines, including artificial intelligence (AI) systems. The evolution of AI integration into the standardisation process is crucial, as AI technologies increasingly play a central role in implementing, monitoring, and even developing industry standards. AI for instance can be used to analyse vast datasets in real-time, identifying emerging trends or threats that may require the development of new standards or the revision of existing ones (IEC/ISO 2022).

?Smart standards go beyond traditional static documents. They are dynamic, interactive, and capable of being integrated directly into digital systems, allowing for real-time updates and adjustments as new information becomes available. This is particularly important in sectors like cybersecurity, where the threat landscape is continuously evolving. The ability of AI systems to interact with these standards concisely and effectively ensures that they can be automatically enforced and updated across networks, thereby reducing the window of vulnerability that typically exists between the emergence of a new threat and the implementation of a countermeasure.

The shift towards smart standards also reflects a broader trend in the digital transformation of industries, where AI is increasingly tasked with managing compliance and operational efficiency. As noted in a recent PwC’s report on compliance transformation, digital tools are streamlining compliance processes, enabling quicker and more accurate responses to regulatory changes. The same principles can be applied to standardisation, where AI-driven platforms could facilitate the continuous monitoring and automatic revision of standards, ensuring they are always up-to-date and relevant (PwC, 2022).

In security management, complexity is often the enemy of compliance, especially in environments where the context can rapidly change. For instance, consider the difference in context of a venue that can hosts both a sporting event and a music concert. The security requirements for a football match, where crowd dynamics and potential rivalries might heighten tensions, differ significantly from those of a pop concert, where stage construction, fan enthusiasm and crowd behaviour create different challenges. Similarly, a harbour’s security protocols must be adaptable when switching from accommodating a cruise ship with a thousand visitors compared to managing an oil tanker, which carries entirely different risks, such as environmental hazards and heightened regulatory scrutiny.

AI-driven systems, when integrated with smart standards, can automatically adjust and enforce security protocols tailored to these varying contexts. This capability allows for continuous monitoring and rapid adaptation to specific threats associated with each scenario. In the example of the harbour, AI could dynamically assess applicable standards and the risk factors associated with an oil tanker’s arrival, such as potential spills or terrorism, and modify security protocols accordingly. The same system, when faced with a cruise ship, would focus on different standards and risks, such as managing large crowds and ensuring the safety of tourists.

The ability of AI systems to interact with and adapt smart standards in real-time is critical in these variable contexts. This adaptability ensures that security measures are not only up to date but also specifically tailored to the unique challenges posed by each situation, thereby effectively mitigating threats as they arise. As the landscape of threats continues to evolve, so too must the standards and protocols that govern security management, ensuring they remain relevant and effective in any given context.

However, the integration of AI and Machine learning (ML) into the standardisation process brings with it the challenge of establishing and maintaining trust. Trust is a fundamental concern in security management, particularly when relying on AI to make critical decisions related to threat detection and mitigation. Organisations must have confidence that these AI-driven systems are not only accurate and effective but also transparent and accountable. This is where SMART standards can play a crucial role. By embedding clear, auditable criteria within these standards, it becomes possible to ensure that AI systems are operating within agreed-upon parameters and are subject to oversight. This transparency is essential to building and maintaining trust in AI-driven security systems. (IEC/ISO 2022)

The shift towards SMART standards however will require significant investment, not just in technology but also in developing the skills and processes needed to support their adoption. This transition necessitates a cultural shift within standards bodies and organisations, where the traditional, often slower, consensus-driven approach must evolve to embrace the agility and speed of digital tools. At the same time, this shift must be managed carefully to avoid introducing new risks. The increased reliance on digital tools and AI makes the standardisation process itself a potential target for cyberattacks, necessitating robust cybersecurity measures to protect the integrity of the process.?

Ultimately, the digital transformation of the standardisation process, particularly through the adoption of smart standards and the integration of AI and ML, holds significant promise for enhancing security management. These advancements can lead to more efficient, responsive, and trustworthy standards, ensuring that organisations are better equipped to address the rapidly evolving threat landscape. However, the success of this transformation depends on the ability to build and maintain trust in AI-driven systems, as well as the commitment to safeguarding the standardisation process from new security threats. As the digital age continues to unfold, embracing these innovations in standardisation is not only an opportunity but a critical necessity for ensuring robust and reliable security management practices.?

The Role of Crowdsourcing and Open Innovation?

Crowdsourcing and open innovation offer promising alternative methods for developing and updating industry standards, with the potential to make the process more inclusive, dynamic, and reflective of the current needs of various industries, including security management. Unlike traditional approaches that rely on a relatively small group of experts, these methods leverage the collective intelligence of a broad and diverse group of contributors, drawing on a wide array of expertise, perspectives, and real-world experiences.

Research underscores the benefits of this approach. A systematic review by Mas-Tur et al. (2021) highlights how crowdsourcing can effectively harness diverse knowledge and skills, leading to more innovative and practical solutions in various industries. Similarly, Hossain, M. (2015) in his integrative literature review, emphasise that crowdsourcing and open innovation enable the inclusion of a broader range of stakeholders in the standardisation process, ensuring that the resulting standards are more robust and better suited to the complexities of modern industry challenges (Mas-Tur et al., 2021; Hossain, M. 2015).

However, while the inclusivity and dynamism of crowdsourcing and open innovation present significant advantages, there are also challenges that need to be carefully managed. One key concern is quality control—ensuring that the contributions gathered through these methods are accurate, reliable, and meet the necessary technical and regulatory standards. Without proper oversight, there is a risk that the standards developed through crowdsourcing may lack the rigor and consistency required for effective implementation in high-stakes environments like security management.

Another challenge lies in managing intellectual property (IP). The open nature of crowdsourcing and innovation platforms can lead to complexities in determining ownership of the ideas and solutions generated, which can, in turn, affect the willingness of experts and organisations to participate. Addressing these IP concerns is crucial to fostering a collaborative environment that encourages broad participation while protecting contributors’ rights.

Despite these challenges, crowdsourcing and open innovation do not have to replace traditional standardisation methods but can instead complement them. A hybrid model that combines the strengths of both approaches could be particularly effective. Traditional methods provide the necessary structure, rigor, and authority, while crowdsourcing and open innovation introduce flexibility, inclusivity, and real-time responsiveness. In security management, this hybrid approach could lead to the development of standards that are not only technically sound but also practical, contextually relevant, and capable of evolving alongside emerging threats.

?Crowdsourcing and open innovation offer significant potential for transforming the standardisation process, particularly in industries where adaptability and inclusivity are key. By integrating these methods with traditional approaches, it is possible to create a more agile and responsive system for developing and updating standards, better suited to the complexities of modern security challenges. To fully realize this potential, it is essential to address the challenges of quality control and intellectual property management, ensuring that the standards produced are both effective and sustainable.

Balancing Speed with Governance and Quality

?In the fast-paced world of security management, the need for quicker standardisation processes is undeniable. However, this urgency must be carefully balanced with the necessity of maintaining rigorous governance and quality controls. Standards that are developed and implemented too hastily risk being incomplete, unreliable, or not widely accepted, which could ultimately undermine their effectiveness and the security they aim to protect.

The United Nations Industrial Development Organisation (UNIDO) underscores the importance of good governance in digital transformation, noting that while speed is crucial, it must not come at the expense of quality and fairness. This perspective is particularly relevant in security management, where standards serve as the foundation for protecting assets, information, and people. Standards must be robust enough to withstand scrutiny and flexible enough to adapt to new threats and challenges (UNIDO, 2022).?

Similarly, the Accenture Compliance Risk Study highlights the importance of maintaining strong compliance frameworks in rapidly changing environments. The study suggests that while there is pressure to move quickly, particularly in response to emerging risks, this must not compromise the thoroughness and reliability of the standards being implemented. A framework that balances speed with quality ensures that standards remain effective over the long term, even as the landscape continues to evolve (Accenture, 2022).

The challenge, therefore, lies in finding the right balance between agility and thoroughness. One potential solution is a dual-track approach to standardisation. In this model, urgent updates and revisions could be implemented quickly using digital tools, enabling organisations to respond promptly to immediate threats or changes in the environment. Meanwhile, more comprehensive reviews and updates would be conducted periodically, ensuring that the standards remain robust, reliable, and widely accepted over time.

This approach allows for both the flexibility needed to address urgent security concerns and the depth required for long-term governance. By combining rapid response capabilities with a commitment to quality and fairness, the standardisation process can better meet the demands of modern security management, ensuring that it is both effective and sustainable in the face of an ever-evolving threat landscape.

Conclusion

The traditional process of developing and implementing industry standards has been criticised for its inefficiency, particularly in rapidly evolving fields like security management. The challenges of adapting to new threats and technologies, combined with the slow pace of traditional standardisation, have highlighted the need for a more agile and responsive approach. As we have explored, the digital transformation offers significant opportunities to modernise these processes through the integration of smart standards, AI-driven systems, crowdsourcing, and open innovation.

The move towards digital tools and platforms, as evidenced by reports from PwC, and IEC/ISO, is already reshaping how standards are created and maintained. These innovations allow for real-time updates, greater inclusivity in the standardisation process, and more dynamic responses to emerging security challenges. However, this shift also requires careful consideration of governance and quality, ensuring that the speed of innovation does not compromise the reliability and trustworthiness of the standards themselves.

Looking forward, the future of industry standardisation is likely to involve a more integrated approach that blends traditional methodologies with these digital advancements. Organisations must be proactive in adopting these new methods, recognising that continuous updates and collaborative development are key to maintaining standards that are both relevant and effective. By embracing this hybrid model, the industry can create a standardisation process that not only keeps pace with technological advancements but also ensures robust, reliable compliance in an increasingly complex security landscape.

In conclusion, while the road to a fully modernised standardisation process is challenging, it is essential for maintaining the effectiveness of security management practices. As the digital age continues to unfold, the industry must commit to evolving its approaches, leveraging the power of digital tools and collaborative innovation to build standards that can stand the test of time and keep pace with the ever-changing threat environment.

References

1.???? Accenture (2022). Compliance Risk Study 2022. Link

2.???? IEC (2022). Smart: Transforming Standards for the Digital World. Link

3.???? Hossain, M. (2015). Crowdsourcing in business and management disciplines: an integrative literature review. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research. Link

4.???? Mas-Tur, A., et al. (2021). Crowdsourcing and open innovation: a systematic literature review, an integrated framework, and a research agenda. Journal of Business Economics. Link

5.???? PwC (2022). Compliance Transformed. Link

6.? UNIDO (2022). Standards for Digital Transformation: Good Governance in the Digital Age. Link

Ends

………………………………………………………………………………………………

The information in the article represents my own views

For editorial enquiries, kindly contact me via direct message.?