Different from Phishing, Scarier than Malware: The Threat of Zero-Click Attacks
The Silent Cyber Threat
Welcome dear reader to today's conversation.
While it is true that cyber threats are evolving rapidly, it is even mind boggling that we are witnesses to the introduction of new and more sophisticated attack methods, that go beyond just clicking a link. One such emerging and highly dangerous threat is the zero-click attack—a highly targeted cyberattack often used in espionage campaigns that leaves minimal traces.
Most cyberattacks require some form of user interaction, such as clicking a link or opening a file. However, zero-click attacks bypass this requirement, infiltrating devices without any action from the victim. This makes them especially dangerous, as users remain unaware that their devices have been compromised.
Zero-click attacks exploit zero-day vulnerabilities, flaws that software vendors have not yet discovered or patched. Since no security updates exist to fix these vulnerabilities, affected users remain exposed to significant risks.
A Step-by-Step Breakdown
Zero-click attacks typically follow a structured approach, consisting of the following stages:
1. Finding and Exploiting Vulnerabilities
Attackers identify a zero-day vulnerability in a targeted application or operating system. Commonly exploited vulnerabilities include:
These vulnerabilities are cataloged under the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) database and tracked by organisations like MITRE under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) framework.
2. Delivering the Malicious Payload
Once a vulnerability is identified, attackers craft a malicious payload and deliver it via channels that automatically process data, such as:
Since applications process this data automatically, the exploit is triggered upon receipt.
3. Exploiting the Vulnerability and Executing Code
Upon processing, the malicious payload executes, allowing the attacker to:
4. Deploying Spyware or Malware
Once the device is compromised, attackers can deploy:
5. Erasing Evidence and Maintaining Stealth
To maintain stealth, attackers:
Notable Real-World Cases
Zero-click attacks are expensive and often target high-value individuals. Here are some notable real-life cases:
1. Pegasus Spyware (2016 - Ongoing)
2. WhatsApp Zero-Click Vulnerability (May 2019)
3. iOS 12 Zero-Click Exploit (2019)
4. Simjacker (2019)
Protecting Against Zero-Click Attacks: Best Security Practices
Since zero-click attacks rely on undetected vulnerabilities, proactive defence is critical. Organisations and individuals should implement the following security measures:
1. Keep Software Updated
2. Limit Exposure to Untrusted Data
3. Monitor for Unusual Activity
4. Use Sandboxing and Isolation Techniques
5. Strengthen Network Security & Endpoint Protection
6. Stay Informed and Train Users
The Need for Vigilance
Zero-click attacks represent a growing cybersecurity challenge due to their stealth and sophistication. By exploiting zero-day vulnerabilities, attackers can infiltrate devices without user interaction, making detection and mitigation difficult. Organizations and individuals must adopt proactive security measures such as patch management, behavioral monitoring, and application hardening to protect against these evolving threats.
Till next time, stay alert!
References
MITRE ATT&CK Framework - attack.mitre.org, CWE Mitre - cwe.mitre.org, CVE Details - cvedetails.com, Google Project Zero - googleprojectzero.blogspot.com, Citizen Lab (Pegasus Spyware Research) - citizenlab.ca, Check Point Research - research.checkpoint.com, Microsoft Security Research - microsoft.com/security/blog
Electrical and Instrumentation Technologist | Cyber Ethical Hacker | Cybersecurity Blogger | Cybersecurity Researcher and Trainer | QMS ISO 9001:2015 Auditor.
2 周That was a highly informative writeup, I would like to say this though. Exploiting zero-day vulnerability is the dream of any threat actor, and the remedy is to shut down till a patch is available. The zero-click exploitation or attack, as mentioned, is a nation-sponsored attack that is at another level of APT, hard to defend against but can be detected, and managed to mitigate the impact on operations.