Differences Between Boeing and Airbus AMP Preparation Processes

Aircraft Maintenance Program (AMP)

It's crucial to understand that an AMP is essential for maintaining an aircraft's airworthiness throughout its lifecycle. The AMP largely originates from the MPD, which is developed based on the Maintenance Review Board's recommendations, Certification Specifications , and other regulatory and manufacturer documentation; however the AMP will grow with additional data from repairs, Service Bulletins, Airworthiness Directives and customisable equipment as a few additional consideration examples. For an operator, it's important to recognize that while the AMP is grounded in standard practices and regulatory requirements, there's room for customization based on operational experience, environmental considerations, and specific aircraft configurations. This customization is particularly relevant when an aircraft transitions between operators or returns to a lessor (hardback). During such transitions, the AMP must typically be aligned with the original MPD thresholds or it might change to a new operators intervals. This process, often referred to as a "bridging check," ensures continuity of airworthiness standards despite potential variations in maintenance practices between different operators. In the context of leasing and hardback, it's critical for operators to be aware of the AMP's flexibility in terms of task intervals and thresholds. These can be adapted based on factors like operational environment, aircraft reliability, and specific modifications or repairs unique to an aircraft. However, any changes to the standard MPD thresholds within an AMP require regulatory approval and must be meticulously managed during lease transitions to ensure compliance and safety; it is also important that the scope of tasks that can be amended is limited. In summary, while the AMP is a regulatory requirement and is fundamentally based on standardized Maintenance Planning Data, it allows for operator-specific adjustments to accommodate unique operational contexts. During aircraft lease transitions or hand backs, it's essential to realign the AMP with the original MPD thresholds, ensuring a seamless transition and continuous compliance with airworthiness standards.

Airbus – AMP

The Airbus ALS is an integral part of the aircraft's Aircraft Maintenance Program (AMP). It is structured into sections, each addressing different aspects of airworthiness and maintenance requirements:

ALS Part 1 - Safe Life Airworthiness Limitation Items (SLI): This part includes items known as LLP, which have a predetermined lifespan after which they must be replaced to ensure safety.

ALS Part 2 - Fatigue & Damage Tolerant Airworthiness Limitation Items (ALI): It focuses on parts that are critical for maintaining the aircraft's integrity over time, taking into account the effects of fatigue and potential damage.

ALS Part 3 - Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMR): These are maintenance requirements that stem from the aircraft's certification process, ensuring continued compliance with safety standards.

ALS Part 4 - System Equipment Maintenance Requirements (SEMR): This section deals with the maintenance needs of specific systems and equipment on the aircraft.

ALS Part 5 - Fuel Airworthiness Limitations (FAL): It addresses maintenance and inspection requirements specific to the aircraft's fuel system to maintain safety and performance. The AMP integrates information from the ALS and MPD, along with other OEM documentation and regulatory requirements, to create a tailored maintenance plan specific to the aircraft's operations. It takes into account the operating environment, usage patterns, and specific regulatory requirements applicable to the operator.

The process of developing an AMP involves analysing the tasks and intervals outlined in the MPD, incorporating the mandatory requirements from the ALS, and adapting this information to the specific needs and circumstances of the aircraft's operation. This may involve adjusting maintenance intervals based on operational experience, specific environmental conditions, or other factors that could affect the aircraft's performance and reliability. There are many other considerations in the AMP also such as ICA from modifications or supplemental type certificates, additional equipment / customisable equipment such as cabin emergency equipment and other such sources.

Boeing?- AMP

Building a Boeing AMP is a multi-faceted process, essential for ensuring an aircraft's safety, airworthiness, and compliance with regulatory standards. This comprehensive approach involves integrating a variety of considerations and once created it needs to be maintained throughout the aircraft life. The MPD is the foundation of the AMP, providing detailed guidelines for routine maintenance based on effectivity, configuration and status of the aircraft.

Airworthiness Directives (ADs) are mandates issued by aviation authorities to address identified safety concerns. These directives can modify existing maintenance requirements or introduce new tasks.

Service Bulletins (SBs), issued by the aircraft manufacturer or Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), although compliance isn't always mandatory, adhering to them when accomplished is required.

Supplemental Type Certificates (STCs) authorize modifications affecting the aircraft's type certification. Each STC includes specific ICAs that must be integrated into the AMP.

Modifications and repairs can introduce new maintenance requirements / ICAs, necessitating their documentation and incorporation into the AMP.

OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) Instructions for Continued Airworthiness provide comprehensive maintenance procedures from the manufacturers, ensuring multiple components and equipment remain airworthy.

The Emergency Equipment Listing (EEL) details items you need ot review for ICA from OEM for critical safety equipment, such as life jackets based on the CMM from equipment manufacturers.

National Aviation Authority (NAA) Requirements must also be considered, as local regulations can influence maintenance practices and schedules, necessitating adjustments to the AMP to ensure compliance.

Operational Environment Considerations, such as climate and flight routes, impact maintenance needs and schedules. Reliability Data and Operator Experience play a role in maintenance practices. Historical data and experience can lead to adjustments in the AMP thresholds. This is a snapshot of part of the sources considerations; for lease return awareness that reliability and operator experience can also affect the task frequency, it might be reduced from the MPD recommendations, or due to operating environment there may be additional tasks – this is an important consideration when looking at return from lease as commonly you will return to MPD default intervals.

Differences Between Boeing and Airbus AMP Preparation Processes

The processes for preparing AMP for Boeing and Airbus aircraft are based on each manufacturer's unique philosophies and approaches. Below are the key differences between the Boeing and Airbus AMP preparation processes:

1. Maintenance Planning Documents

Airbus: The Airbus MPD provides detailed information on the intervals and duration of specific tasks. The MPD from Airbus has a dynamic structure that includes regular reviews and updates of tasks.

Boeing: Boeing’s MPD also includes maintenance tasks and intervals but tends to determine maintenance requirements based on the effectiveness, configuration, and status of the aircraft. Boeing’s MPD generally offers a broader scope and flexibility in tasks.

2. Airworthiness Directives (ADs) and Service Bulletins (SBs)

Airbus: Airbus tightly integrates ADs and SBs. Airbus SBs include recommendations that must be strictly followed to maintain the integrity and performance of the aircraft.

Boeing: Boeing offers a more flexible approach to SBs. Boeing SBs may often be optional, with recommendations that operators can choose to implement at their discretion. However, ADs addressing specific safety concerns must be implemented mandatorily.

3. Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS)

Airbus: The Airbus ALS is divided into several parts, each addressing different airworthiness and maintenance requirements. These parts include SLI, ALI, CMR, SEMR, and FAL.

Boeing: Boeing integrates ALS primarily through ADs and CMRs. Boeing’s ALS focuses on the life of parts and safety requirements.

4. Supplemental Type Certificates (STCs) and Modifications

Airbus: Airbus integrates STCs and modifications into the AMP, carefully monitoring and applying their Instructions for ICA. Airbus modifications usually adhere strictly to Airbus’s own standards and requirements.

Boeing: Boeing offers more flexibility in integrating STCs and modifications. Boeing modifications can be customized to meet the operator’s needs and are aligned with Boeing’s overall maintenance philosophy.

5. Operational Environment Conditions and Reliability Data

Airbus: Airbus takes operational environment conditions and reliability data into account when developing the AMP. Airbus may adjust maintenance intervals based on different operating conditions and incorporate this data into the AMP.

Boeing: Similarly, Boeing uses operational environment conditions and reliability data as part of the AMP. However, Boeing places more emphasis on operator experience and historical data, offering broader flexibility in maintenance intervals.

Conclusion

While both manufacturers follow similar steps in the preparation of AMPs, the differences between Airbus and Boeing are evident in task planning, the integration of ADs and SBs, the structure of ALS, the management of STCs and modifications, and the approach to operational environment conditions. These differences stem from each manufacturer’s unique maintenance philosophies and methods of adapting to operational needs.

?