The Difference Between “Single Source of Truth” and “Single Point of Truth”
Peter Schlegel
Managing Director at CAXperts | Revolutionary software for Owner/Operators as well as EPCs #gerneperdu #callmebymyfirstname
We frequently observe that large software systems are implemented to act as a “Single Source of Truth”. This involves importing data and documents from various sources into these systems.
What sets the CAXperts UniversalPlantViewer apart from such software is its approach to data storage and management. Unlike systems that collect and update all data in a central repository, the UniversalPlantViewer leaves the data in their original systems. These origin systems are optimally tailored for the usage and management of these specific data.
The real innovation of the UniversalPlantViewer lies in its ability to link and make accessible these scattered data sets. Leveraging advanced web technologies, the UniversalPlantViewer enables the representation of all relevant data in an interactive 3D model. This offers an unmatched overview, significantly facilitating the work of engineers, project managers, and other stakeholders.
This innovative method establishes new standards in data presentation and management in our industry. The UniversalPlantViewer is not merely a tool; it is a comprehensive solution that enhances efficiency, improves communication, and ultimately contributes to making better, faster decisions.
In a world where data is increasingly crucial, the CAXperts UniversalPlantViewer exemplifies how technological innovations can transform the handling of information in the plant construction industry. Therefore, the UniversalPlantViewer represents a smart approach to data viewing, rather than merely collecting data.
Leading Digital Acceleration
1 年An interesting take on the difference between the two concepts. IMO neither is ideal. You clearly identify some flaws with a central repository but your approach leaves the opportunity for data inconsistencies being presented to the end user, this itself drives confusion and reduces trust in the data. Without trust a system is rendered unable. A hybrid approach is most likely the best answer. Data is hard. Thanks for sharing!
Construction Management | Field Control Management
1 年Interesting! Sorry, last couple of months I asked about the ISO 19650 or BIM Standards. This UPV outlined according to the guidelines, protocols, and best practices used to ensure that models are created or reviewed and used consistently and effectively. I think, all the BIM 8 D’s dimentions this UPV is capable of. Thanks for giving insights!
Agile Coach | Driving project success for businesses by implementing Agile methodologies and maximizing resource efficiency for streamlined delivery | PMP Certified | PSM Certified | IIM A
1 年Peter Schlegel - your insight into the limitations of traditional single-source software systems and the unique approach of CAXperts UniversalPlantViewer is truly intriguing. The idea of leaving data in their original systems while creating a comprehensive view through interlinked accessibility is groundbreaking. The emphasis on leveraging advanced web technologies to render scattered data into an interactive 3D model is commendable. This not only streamlines the work of engineers and project managers but also sets new standards in data presentation and management within the industry.