Diet for a Warm, Parched, Crowded Planet: Where’s the Beef?
David L. Katz, MD, MPH
CMO, Tangelo. Founder: Diet ID; True Health Initiative. Founding Director, Yale-Griffin PRC (1998-2019). Health Journalist. COVID Curmudgeon
I am just back from UMass in Amherst, Massachusetts, and the 2016 Chef Culinary Conference. The conference is in fact still on-going as I write this, but my day job beckoned, and I could not stay through to the end. My loss! The conference is a fabulous gathering of experts in food science, nutrition, public health, and the environment- as well as the art, and business, of food service. The audience is mostly chefs overseeing university dining programs, with the potential to influence the diets, and thus health, of many tens of thousands of students.
I was pleased and honored to speak on one of my recurrent themes: knowing what to eat, but refusing to swallow it. The theme of the conference this year is “food is medicine, food is love,” and thus my wife, Catherine S. Katz, PhD, founder of Cuisinicity.com, fit in beautifully. Catherine’s freely available recipe offerings, inspired by her Mediterranean upbringing, her love of both our family and good food, and the delight she takes in nourishing the one with the other- come with the tag line: love the food that loves you back. I acknowledge my bias in noting that her talk, and cooking demonstration, were a highlight for me- but I heard much the same from many who lack my bias.
A reality check about protein, what happens to it in the body, how much more we all get daily than most of us need, and its availability in plant sources by my good friend, the witty, knowledgeable, and always insightful (if sartorially challenged…) Christopher Gardner from Stanford was another highlight. So, too, were presentations on the timely, practical implications of the stellar Menus of Change program by Greg Drescher of the Culinary Institute of America, and the shock waves of change being generated by the Compass Group, responsible for feeding some 8.5 million people in the U.S. daily, as told by Christine Seitz. And yet another was a coffee table conversation with the inimitable Alice Waters, who shared a bounty of experience-based wisdom that was as provocative as it was gentle.
And this was all in just a day and a half. So, kudos to Ken Toong and colleagues at UMass for so rewarding a convocation.
There was clearly a theme, reinforced by nearly every participant. That theme was, in the proverbial nutshell: more plants, less meat.
To be clear, this is a culinary conference. We academics with nutrition expertise were just visiting. The prevailing devotion among the assembled, and the bar to clear, was culinary excellence and satisfied customers. The mix included chefs from successful, high-end restaurants. Devotion to good food was simply not negotiable.
But the theme was embraced by all just the same. All assembled acknowledged the overwhelming evidence of human health benefit from diets placing greater emphasis on vegetables, whole grains, beans, lentils, nuts, seeds, and fruit. But the greater sense of urgency clearly issued from concerns about the health of the planet. That the environmental impact of meat-centric diets was unsustainable, and untenable, was the common call to action.
This is compelling, because this was not, in particular, a gathering of nutritionists. This was not a gathering of environmentalists. This was a gathering preferentially of chefs, food service executives, restaurateurs, and business leaders.
But they all live here, too- here being: Earth. And they see what’s going on.
This was not a gathering of vegans, or vegetarians, although there were a few in the mix. Mostly, these were people who had enjoyed being omnivores their whole lives, and who were pledged to make food enjoyable for others. Most were committed to keeping meat in the culinary mix, even while reducing its prominence. But they were all, either because or perhaps despite what they learned in chef school, literate to the writing on the wall, and embraced the need to change. The goal for all concerned was food we can continue to love, but that loves us, and the planet back. It’s a new day.
There are, inevitably, those who prefer old days, good for them if not the rest of us. There are those who refute established fact about the environmental impact of foods, and the weight of evidence regarding human health effects. They are, of course, selling something. They are selling meat, and overcooked tales about it.
But so what? We aren’t actually na?ve enough to believe that Coca Cola would be the best place to get objective information about the weight, health, happiness, or environmental effects of soda consumption, are we? No more so is the beef industry and its allies (or, more bluntly, propagandists) with regard to their wares.
For whatever it’s worth, I side with those who acknowledge and respect the consensus of paleoanthropologists: we Homo sapiens are traditional, constitutional omnivores. But I side with those who concede we are not in the Stone Age anymore, and that what worked for scattered, roaming tribes is all but moot for a global horde of 8 billion. We can be informed by studies of the Stone Age, but we can’t live there.
Participants in the UMass conference clearly understand and embrace this. They have joined ranks to create a recipe with all the right ingredients: culinary delight, human health benefit, environmental stewardship, sustainability, ethical treatment of our fellow creatures, and business opportunity. It’s a recipe for our world in our time.
Those who oppose this adaptive response to our ever warmer, drier, more populated world oppose change against the weight of evidence from diverse domains, and a global consensus. They oppose change that will do much needed good, simply because they are doing so well with the status quo. We have seen this before, and obfuscation in its service, from the tobacco industry; the soda industry; climate denialists; and the gun lobby. The Merchants of Doubt are clearly ecumenical. Fortunately, so is the truth, and its relentless, if at times painfully slow, pertinacity.
Those who have a prominent beef with the confluent themes of human and planetary health and the responses to them, want meat at the center of the plate often because it is at the center of their profits. They are, simply, on the wrong side of history in a changing world, and the diverse constituencies assembled in Amherst invite them to catch up, or be left behind.
For those paying attention, and honest about the warm, parched, crowded planet they see- meat is ceding the center of the plate. Where's the beef? Moved to the margins, by the diverse hands of a growing, global congregation, and ever more chefs.
-fin
Director, Yale University Prevention Research Center; Griffin Hospital
President, American College of Lifestyle Medicine
Senior Medical Advisor, Verywell.com
Founder, The True Health Initiative
Follow at: LinkedIN; Twitter; Facebook
Read at: INfluencer Blog; Huffington Post; US News & World Report
Independent Distributor as wellness and nutrition coach with Juice Plus
3 年I am a pediatrician and daily talk to my patients and their parents about the same issues , maybe not in as eloquent a manner. If we don't encourage our youth to make changes, and think differently we will destroy mother earth before they are our age!!
Passionate Chef,experienced in restaurant,catering and private parties.
8 年Excellent article! I'm inclined to agree with Mr. Katz, as a multi heart surgery patient I see and feel the benefits of eating less or no meat at all. The positives out weigh the negatives here, and in the end we have a healthier ?? planet!
Senior Director of Research and Product Development
8 年Chris , I too follow Weston Price....meat began its health decline when humans started feeding animals GRAIN.... Grain fed meat is near poisonous...the spike in post prandial inflammation is enormous compared to grass fed meat....simply our bodies do not recognize this modern meat.... Animal fats are key to health, as long as the animal lived properly (no grain , pastured, and no hormones ....)... Don't avoid real meat, avoid factory made oils (canola is the main culprit)...
I was a vegetarian for a long time, then I decided to try eating meat again and to my surprise, immediately felt better afterward. A dentist at the turn of the century, Weston A Price, went on a journey to find out how diet affected carries and instead discovered different indigenous diets from around the world. None were quite the same but ALL ate meat. He found that the Inuits survived on about 80%fat and 20% protein along with fermented fish that they buried. High fat diets were unheard of at that time, so he induced that your background or genetics determines what foods your body does best with and not a 'one diet' or the 'latest fad diet fits all'. When I eat something, I now search to see how I feel after consuming it, energized or tired, etc. Meat = energized for me, certainly not every day, but at least some in my diet again. Animals can be raised sustainably. Meat may cost more that way, but in the big picture, it would be worth it. When I was little, my father could only afford steak once, or maybe, twice a week as it was that expensive. Now it's cheap and raised in 'factories'. Cheap meat and factory farming are relatively new and merely profit driven, but has a high cost at the back end. We need to buy local and demand better for our planet and the animals that support us. JM2￠, as always.