Did You Know These Depressing Facts on Innovation?
Gijsbertus J.J. van Wulfen
Innovation keynote speaker, Number One Thought Leader Design Thinking 2024, LinkedIn Top Voice helping you and your organisation, to become amazing innovators with keynotes, workshops, and a proven innovation method.
Innovation is seen by a lot of corporate executives and venture capitalists as a black hole, where large sums of money go in and very seldom really innovative products or services come out. And most of the time they are right.
The facts are quite depressing. Of the approximately 12,000 new introductions in fast moving consumer goods to Western European markets between 2011 and 2013, only seven generated more than €10 million in the first year, and an even smaller amount maintained similar performance through year two. On top of that, 76% of all so-called innovations did not even achieve 52 weeks of sales (and barely half achieved even 26 weeks of sales).[i] Market Research Company Nielsen states that new fast moving consumer goods have only a 10% chance of succeeding. Booz & Company reports that 66% of new products fail within 2 years. And Doblin Group reported in a 2012 study that 96% of all innovations fail to return their cost of capital.[ii] Financial giant Morgan Stanley estimates that, of the $ 2.7 trillion that companies pour into technology each year, more than $ 500 billion is wasted, in large part due to implementation failure of new innovations.[iii]
High failure rates of innovation don’t start at market launch. The innovation process from idea to market itself is full of pitfalls and inefficiencies too. Stage-Gate founder, Robert Cooper, shows that for every seven new product ideas about 4 enter development, 1.5 are launched, and only one succeeds.[iv] A study of Stevens and Burley gives even more disastrous ratios. Their study shows it takes 3,000 raw ideas to come up with 1 successful product. This means that enormous amounts of enthusiasm, energy, time and financial resources of organizations are spent in the innovation process without direct returns. Innovation of course is a learning process full of experimenting and trial and error, where you can’t expect to always get it right the first time. You learn an awful lot from all the iterations in a new concept, which pays off in other projects or in your daily business. But do you accept wasting more than 85% of your time and money in innovation, because it’s so risky? Well, I don’t! I see an enormous potential for improvement.
Startups are not doing much better by the way. Eric Ries, author of The Lean Startup, defines a startup as “a human institution designed to create a new product or service under conditions of extreme uncertainty.” And the facts reflect the extreme uncertainty mentioned. A US study among 2000 startups financed with venture capital between 2004 and 2010 reveals that more than 95% of the startups fail to see the projected return on investment. An estimated 30% to 40% of high potential US startups liquidate all assets, with investors losing all their money. Of all startups, about 60% of the companies survive to age three and roughly 35% survive to age ten, according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.[v] Startups fail according to Ries because the old management methods of a good plan, a solid strategy and thorough market research don’t work for startups, as they operate with too much uncertainty. Also according to Ries, adopting the just-do-it mentality does not work either.[vi]
Reflecting on these facts you will certainly conclude that innovation is indeed a messy business. Are you personally prepared to run a risk? A calculated risk, perhaps? I do hope so, because not innovating is not an option anymore! It's essential for corporations to professionalise their people, processes, structure and culture in search for innovation excellence, as this will drive future growth.
To read more from Gijs on LinkedIn, please click the FOLLOW button above or below.
Did you like this article? It's part of Gijs van Wulfen's new innovation book. Check out the introduction offer at: Amazon UK (https://amzn.to/1Z2AGpR) or Amazon US (https://amzn.to/1YjqiMt)
If you liked this post and you're looking for an inspiring innovation speaker, check out the movies and fantastic reviews at gijsvanwulfen.com
[i] Source: https://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/nielsenglobal/eu/nielseninsights/pdfs/Breakthrough_Innovation_Report_EU_FINAL.pdf
[ii] Fast company, April 4, 2012.
[iii] K.J. Klein & A.P. Knight, Innovation Implementation, American Psychological Society, Volume 14 – Number 5, pp. 244-245.
[iv] Robert G. Cooper, Winning at New Products, Basic Books, New York, 2011, p. 18.
[v] The Wall Street Journal, https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10000872396390443720204578004980476429190)
[vi] Eric Ries, The Lean Startup, Penguin, 2011, p. 9.
Award-winning science journalist | Senior Producer of The Intelligence
8 年Fascinating article, there is a huge amount of spectacular work being done to create innovation and new technology in universities but we find the main problem is creating the first conversations that will lead to co-development. That's why IN-PART was set up! We have 50+ global universities and 500+ companies using the platform to gain the first introductions to relevant technologies. Innovation is as much about the people as it is the ideas!
Gerente comercial na Guedes Messeder - Solu??es em TI
8 年It would be useful that the statistics could discriminate the percentage for technical and business model innovations. I do not believe that the numbers are the same for both initiatives and I’m wondering if this data refers solely to the former.
Quasar ScienceTech Founder | Director | Research Scientist I Inventor I Consultant | Author a Book & Research Publications |
8 年It seems to me that provided statistical data are not accurate. If the success of innovation implementations were low, humankind would not make so much progress in the fundamental and applied sciences, especially, in last 200 years. The provided data are in contradiction with so many achievements, such as developments and applications of new materials, new technologies, new devises (smart phones, computers (Moore’s law), new cars, spaceships, telescopes, microscopes, etc.); producing new chemical elements; visiting the Moon; achievements in agriculture, medicine, fundamental sciences (e.g. quantum mechanics, general theory of relativity, string theory, black hole theory, etc.). Progress in the development of advanced material applications and technologies is an essential pillar for viable economic growth. Certainly, the innovation development and implementation should be accelerated. For example, if the market requires a new application, the state of the materials system should be analyzed and changed to produce a new material or process and determine an optimal development of the new application. A new material and/or process (technology) can be developed according to the new market and application requirements by optimization of materials composition, changing chemical bonds, and the physico-chemical interactions in the materials systems. This concept can accelerate the innovation implementation in corresponding industrial sectors, which need new materials and technologies for variety of applications, such as clean energy, transportation, electronics and other fields. https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/novel-concept-new-materials-technology-developments-kish-ph-d-?trk=pulse_spock-articles
Founder i-Thread Consulting, Digital transformation and tech trends strategy, Business School Professor, PHD researcher in innovation
8 年I agree that innovation outcome statistics are not the top in the class in a business. But projects and products in every industry have their fails on every day business. Look at the oil & energy industry. There is no zero-risk. As you say we need innovation.
Professor, KM and Digital Transformation Expert; and President, Iran Research Institute for Information Science and Technology
8 年Gijs, Innovation should be in line with product or service development and sale. Innovation is not separate from daily works done in business and is not limited to start up programs. when staff member and managers find a different better way to do their task, they force a new alignment and arrangements and this is innovation. In today business environment no business will endure without daily innovations.