Dialogues with ChatGPT: The Artificial Muse Conundrum
Credit: Growtika @ Unsplash

Dialogues with ChatGPT: The Artificial Muse Conundrum

Introduction

Besides work-related discussions, I like to chat with ChatGPT about more philosophical themes stemming from real-life events. This time is about a text that appeared on a banner during one of the AI-related writer's protests.

Note: TLDR is inserted by ChatGPT as per my custom prompt in the "How would like ChatGPT to respond?" settings field.

The dialogue

Alex: During one of the writers' protests, one banner mentioned the following: "ChatGPT Does Not Have Childhood Trauma". What do you think it means?
ChatGPT: It seems like the banner is highlighting the fact that AI, such as ChatGPT, doesn't have personal experiences or emotions, and therefore lacks the depth that human experiences, like childhood trauma, can contribute to creativity and understanding. The message could be a critique or commentary on the idea that AI-generated writing lacks the nuance and emotional depth that come from real human experiences, which can deeply influence a writer’s work.
The TLDR: The banner likely points out that AI can't replicate the complex emotional background of a human writer, like experiences of trauma, which can shape their creativity and insights.
Alex: do you think that the idea expressed by the banner is accurate?
ChatGPT: Yeah, the idea behind the banner is spot-on. As an AI, I don't have personal experiences or emotions. I don't "feel" anything, so I can't truly understand or express the profound emotional depth that comes from life experiences like childhood trauma. This can make a difference in creative fields, where those personal human experiences can deeply inform and enhance the work.
TLDR: The banner's right—I don't have personal experiences or feelings, so I can't capture the full human emotional experience in my outputs.

The shameless self-promotion

If you're someone who appreciates the traditional Q&A interaction with subject matter experts who are real people with personal experiences and emotions, consider exploring Codidact Q&A Communities. Codidact is also designed to be a place where communities can host?high-quality, peer-reviewed information.

And if you are asking why yet another Q&A community, this article shows some of the reasons for the specific case of Software Development (many reasons apply to many other communities though).

Disclaimer: I am a pro-tempore community moderator for Software Development Codidact.

Cover photo credit: Growtika @ unsplash.com




要查看或添加评论,请登录

Alexandru Dragan的更多文章

  • Dialogues with ChatGPT: The Quirky Sayings Conundrum Hypothesis

    Dialogues with ChatGPT: The Quirky Sayings Conundrum Hypothesis

    Introduction One way for non-work related interaction with ChatGPT is by asking it to analyze humorous human text. I…

  • Dialogues with ChatGPT: The Feline Gastronomy Dilemma

    Dialogues with ChatGPT: The Feline Gastronomy Dilemma

    Introduction Someone recently told me about this question that was supposedly asked by a child: Why is there no…

  • ChatGPT's biases

    ChatGPT's biases

    Introduction I have read many articles and participated in a couple of "brown bag meetings" about how ChatGPT and…

  • Codidact - The Open Source Q&A Platform

    Codidact - The Open Source Q&A Platform

    More than one year ago I have discovered the Codidact Q&A Platform and have been an active member ever since. While it…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了