Detroit’s Disappointed Dreamers Go West
Someone reminded me last week that Larry Burns, former corporate vice president of research and development for General Motors, is an advisor to Google. This reminder followed reports the week before that Apple had hired former Chrysler quality chief, Doug Betts, and the report, last year, that Apple had hired the head of Daimler’s Silicon Valley research office.
The reality is that if you live and work in the auto industry today you know multiple executives, men and women, that have gotten fed up with the monolithic auto industry culture with layers of bureaucracy and inter-divisional in-fighting and chosen to take their skills to the West Coast where generous job offers beckon. This is not to say this is a one-way flow. But I write these words to highlight the appeal of starting fresh in an environment where new thinking is welcomed and effort rewarded.
This isn’t to suggest that all is rosy for those who have taken the plunge. The cost of living in Silicon Valley is prohibitive and a major barrier to overcome for any migrating executive, young or old. And the corporate cultures of Google and Apple have their own challenging downsides which, as I say, has sent some transplants straight back to their homes.
But the powerful elixir of wealthy employers eager to learn about the inner workings of the automotive industry they are in the process of disrupting is hard to ignore. Apple and Google today are Statue-of-Liberty-like beacons to Detroit’s disaffected denizens – give us your poor, your ignored, your fired, your forgotten… “yearning to breathe free.”
But it was the reminder that Larry Burns - co-athor of “Reinventing the Automobile: Personal Urban Mobility for the 21st Century” and a former member of GM’s Automotive Strategy Board and Automotive Product Board - was advising Google that caught me up. Burns was behind the EnV – a two-seat wonder car created initially in cooperation with Segway and intended for autonomous operation.
What is perhaps so notable about the EnV, which has been developed in three different versions and is still in testing, is the fact that if had been developed by Apple or Google the degree of attention the vehicle would have received would have been entirely different. While almost anyone with even a casual interest in the automotive industry is aware of and could spot the so-called and pod-like “Google car,” hardly anyone would know what an EnV was if they saw it. (Indications are that GM is incubating the EnV in China - so maybe the direction to look for innovation is actually East.)
In this way, Silicon Valley not only offers the potential to make automotive dreams come true, it also offers the prospect of having those dreams realized on a more prominent stage. Google and Apple are adept at overcoming the attention-getting deficit disorder that sometimes plagues Detroit.
I am not completely sure why this is. It may have something to do with the fact that the auto industry’s bread and butter still consists of gas guzzling SUV’s, pickup trucks, luxury cars and crossovers. When those vehicles are paying your bills, it’s hard to sacrifice even a portion of the limelight for your teams that are working on alternative fuel technologies and autonomous pods.
Burns co-authored “Reinventing the Automobile” five years ago in cooperation with William J. Mitchell, the former Alexander W. Dreyfoos, Jr., Professor of Architecture and Media Arts and Sciences and director of the Smart Cities research group at MIT’s Media Lab, and Christopher Borroni-Bird, GM’s former director of advanced technology vehicle concepts and currently a vice president of strategic development at Qualcomm. Mitchell passed away in 2010.
Burns' role as a Google advisor is just one of his many ongoing post-GM activities, but his presence on the Silicon Valley scene reminded me of a potentially lethal brain drain confronting Detroit. A major challenge for the city and the industry is attracting and retaining the brightest minds in transportation.
There is an even greater concern, though, in the pull to the West on any and all expertise focused on the security and information technology required to enable connected and autonomous vehicles. I thoroughly enjoyed the now amazingly five-year-old “Reinventing the Automobile” when I first read it. Its relevance endures, as does Larry’s.
Of course, on a cautionary note, Larry has been a powerful advocate for hydrogen fuel cell technology for mass transportation – a source of strong conflicting opinions in the industry. Here is his TED talk on the topic from 2005: https://www.ted.com/talks/reinventing_the_car
The reality is there is little truly new in the automotive industry. Almost everything that can be done with 2, 3 or 4 wheels to move people has been tested or prototyped decades ago. But the Googles and Apples of the world have the potential to poke through the dustbin of rejected ideas and select the one or two they want to pull out and take for a spin.
To listen to Burns’ TED talk of 2005 is to hear the combined innovations of Tesla, Google and Apple all coming from a former GM vice president. BMW may be anticipating the next step with rumors spreading in the industry of an Apple-BMW alliance around the creation of an Apple-enhanced i3 electric vehicle. While the i3 with its carbon fibre componentry and body, and electric powertrain, has been well received by consumers, a partnership with Apple could radically stimulate consumer interest. One has to wonder how consumers might respond to an Apple-badged Nissan Leaf.
The auto industry must not only innovate on technology it must innovate on culture and employee retention to compete. And finally, the industry must innovate on priorities to better highlight emerging powertrain and safety technologies even while continuing to deliver safe and reliable every-day transportation for today’s consumers. BMW may be pointing the way to a more collaborative path to market - or maybe that's what Larry Burns is up to.
CEO at TrafficLand
9 年Thought provoking article Roger, nicely done. There is some interesting innovation going on in the East Coast too......
SSA USPS at United States Postal Service
9 年Well done.
Global Business Partnership Development
9 年Certainly there were a number of reasons I left GM +13 years (native Detroiter and faithful Chevy guy) and it was in great part because of the lack of acceptance of change there. Now after 20 years in the Silicon Valley I am left seeking that change still. We still try to engage them through!
Chief Designer
9 年That's me in the drivers seat of the GM EN-V. I worked with Christopher and his team to make the vehicles as innovative and compelling as possible. Only now is technology catching up with the possibilities and vision of the project.
Lead Innovator - Hypuljet Ltd UK
9 年As an innovator I find that the major auto brands lack the flexibility of Silicon Valley in responding to outside innovation. When Larry Burns as VP was interviewed standing next to the Volt in its initial publicity (Toronto springs to mind) I wrote to Larry and asked that he and GM take a look at my Hydrogen Rotary engine as it would make the future Volt zero emissions. The biggest failing if we can call it that or the greatest difference between the Old and the New is that High Tech companies readily look and search for Open Innovation, wheresas the Old Guard have set up major fortress mentality to open innovation. Surely these companies know what is being researched and developed within their company and can say at the click of a key whether there will be any conflict. No way. Please complete the five or six pages, the first being a waiver which allows them to look at the innovation without any security for the innovators IP. Then at some point we may sign a NDA or such. They know full well that if it is pre Patent or when a Patent has been filed, to make a public statement would risk the grant of a Patent. The Volt was of course preceded by a far more important EV the Hywire. A drive by wire Hydrogen Fuel Cell car. There has been nothing wrong with the forward thinking of GM I believe a comment here says it all, "They have a twisted mentality to big engines and especially in big trucks." All the major Motor manufacturers have been looking at EVs fo 30 or 40 years and GM has been at the forefront so there is no shortage of data and prototypes, to remodel and bring to market. The people who have been making the finance decisions have not been looking at the future around the world only at their US customers. Unfortunately that also affects the other models for the rest of the world. My suggestion to GM is to let their European brands off the lease and to support these in becoming SAAB over again in the application of EVs. There are equally as many futuristic engineers here in Europe as there are in the US and Roger A. mentions one off the greatest. The point I am trying to bring to the fore is that there is innovation which is outside the industry, held by salesmen, motorists, mechanics, etc and this needs to be tapped into. Seven years on from my letter to VP Larry Burns I have managed through sheer doggedness to get someone to look at the details of my revolutionary Hydrogen Rotary engine. Sunderland University AMAP have agreed in principle to build a prototype and we are now in the planning stages. There is every possibility that #HyPulJet Hydrogen Pulse Jet Rotary Engine will be another Betamax v VHS where the Fuel Cell is Betamax. It is fine to think of BEVs in relation to cars and in terms of regular short journey's no problems, but the use of electricity generated from Fossil Fuels has to be brought to an end, otherwise people are fooling themselves on the effect EVs have on cutting CO2 levels in the atmosphere. In terms of heavy use and long journey's and especially Coaches and HGVs, hydrogen is the way forward. It is a matter of a low-cost method of using H2 to create electricity onboard the EV and a low cost approach to producing H2 which does NOT involve fossil fuels. I made a recent improvement in the approach to fueling of the #HyPulJet which is the subject of a second patent filing on the #HyPulJet. This will make the H2 Rotary engine, far more fuel efficient than a fuel cell and as a result I am now able to look at a system able to produce sufficient hydrogen onboard the EV to be able to match the needs. I say again, there are people outside of the Auto Industry workforce who may hold the answer to the problems which the industry faces. I will also add that there are innovators outside of the green energy industry who may hold the answers to clean up the Carbon problem, but after 20 years of the same people looking at the same methods it simply will not happen. There is a need to search out innovation and take a detailed look at anything which has a 50% chance of working. Also for the innovators to be treated fairly in Law and finance details. What goes round comes around, what I have is not new theory or substance but a new way of using existing knowledge, methods and practices. Outside the box thinking combined with a joined up approach and collaboration. Best Regards Al Scott