Detailed Comparisons & Performance Analysis of the 2025 AI RACE

Performance Showdown: Data Over Drama (and over Politics)

A little known Chinese startup, DeepSeek, introduced an AI model that soared to the top of the U.S. App Store, marking the first time since 2022 that ChatGPT had been dethroned

On January 28th , 2025 the competition took a dramatic turn DeepSeek’s cost effective AI triggered a historic market shake up by :

• Wiping out $589 billion from Nvidia’s valuation in a single day,
• Dragging the Nasdaq down by 3%,

and ,?it wasn’t a great day for the world’s richest either,

• the planet’s 500 wealthiest lost a combined $108 billion thanks to DeepSeek (src : bloomberg )

Silicon Valley is abuzz with talk of an “AI race,” but beyond the headlines, what really matters is performance.

This article cuts through the noise to compare DeepSeek and ChatGPT based on real data no hype, no politics, just a technical breakdown of how these two models stack up.

1. Performance Metrics Comparaison DeepSeek Vs Other Models

The image presents a comparative analysis of DeepSeek-V3 against top AI models like Qwen2.5, Llama3.1, Claude-3.5-Sonnet, and GPT-4o , where he benchmarks cover multiple domains, including general knowledge, coding, mathematics, and Chinese language understanding.

What do these metrics mean, and what can we conclude from them about what makes DeepSeek outperform other models in specific areas?

Architecture Comparison

• DeepSeek-V3: Uses a Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture with 671B total parameters but activates only 37B parameters per inference.
• Qwen2.5 (72B) & Llama3.1 (405B): Both use a dense model architecture, meaning all parameters are active during inference.
• Claude-3.5 & GPT-4o: Their exact parameter sizes and architecture details are undisclosed.

Why does this matter and what doesn't it mean ?

MoE architecture allows DeepSeek to use fewer active parameters while maintaining high performance, making it more efficient than dense models like Llama3.1. It balances high computational power with lower resource usage, making it a scalable AI model.

General Knowledge (English)

• MMLU (Understanding Many Topics): DeepSeek scored 88.5, close to GPT-4o and better than Qwen2.5.

= This means it understands a wide range of subjects very well (Gras)

• MMLU-Redux (Even Broader Knowledge): DeepSeek scored 89.1, the highest among all models.

= This shows it remembers and understands general knowledge better than its competitors. (Gras)

• DROP (Logical Thinking in Text): DeepSeek scored 91.6, much higher than GPT-4o.

= This means it’s great at understanding numbers and reasoning when reading long texts.

• GPQA-Diamond (Complex Question Answering): DeepSeek scored 59.1, performing better than GPT-4o but lower than Claude-3.5.

= This shows it can handle tough questions well.

Coding Performance

• HumanEval (Basic Coding Skills): DeepSeek scored 82.6, the best among the models,

= The Meaning : it’s highly capable of solving programming tasks.

• LiveCodeBench (Writing Code in Real Time): With a score of 37.6, DeepSeek performs better than GPT-4o, showing its ability to code effectively in live environments.

• Codeforces (Competitive Coding): DeepSeek scored 51.6, more than twice as high as GPT-4o.

= This means it’s excellent at solving challenging coding problems.

Mathematical Reasoning

• MATH-500 (Advanced Math Skills): DeepSeek scored 90.2, far ahead of GPT-4o.

= This proves it’s highly skilled at solving complex math problems.

• AIME 2024 (Math Olympiad Problems): With a score of 39.2, DeepSeek performed much better than GPT-4o, making it the strongest in competitive math problem-solving.

Chinese Language Understanding

• CLUEWSC (Understanding Chinese Sentences): DeepSeek scored 90.9, showing it can understand Chinese very well, though Qwen2.5 performed slightly better.
• C-Eval (General Knowledge in Chinese): DeepSeek scored 86.5, significantly higher than Claude-3.5, proving its strong understanding of Chinese academic topics.

So what we can conclude from this in a nutshell ?

DeepSeek-V3 excels in math, coding, and Chinese language tasks, making it the best choice for specialized applications. But other models like ChatGPT (GPT-4o) is more versatile, better at general knowledge, writing, and refining code, making it ideal for broader use cases.

Which One of the models Should You Choose ?

The choice between DeepSeek-V3 and ChatGPT (GPT-4o) depends on your specific needs.

• Choose DeepSeek-V3 if you need:Advanced mathematical problem-solving (e.g., complex equations, proofs).Strong competitive programming skills for algorithmic challenges.A model with better Chinese language understanding and accuracy.
• Choose ChatGPT (GPT-4o) if you need:A model that excels in general knowledge, writing, and brainstorming.Better code optimization, debugging, and refinement.A versatile AI capable of handling a wide range of tasks efficiently.

At the end , the best model for you depends on your needs. If your focus is on technical fields like advanced math and programming, DeepSeek-V3 is the better option. But if you need a well-rounded AI for diverse tasks, ChatGPT (GPT-4o) is the more flexible choice

One thing is clear : AI is not just a vision of the future it is actively transforming our world today. From software development to business automation, AI-driven solutions are reshaping industries and redefining the way we work and innovate

Looking for Cutting-Edge AI Software Solutions?

If you need powerful AI-driven software solutions tailored to your business, Attraxia is here to help. Whether you're optimizing workflows, enhancing customer experiences, or leveraging AI for innovation, our solutions are designed to keep you ahead in the AI revolution.

?? Get in touch with Attraxia today and explore the future of AI!