Design and Open Source: A Potentially Powerful Combination

Design and Open Source: A Potentially Powerful Combination

We are very excited about open source software. Open source is a powerful distribution mechanism to get software and people's hands early and easily. In an era where SaaS customer acquisition cost increases monotonically, open source can be a powerful antidote.

The other area that we are spending time in is open source at the application tier. Mattermost is our latest investment there, and we continue to look for others. They tend to be very capital efficient, fast growing businesses that can be quite disruptive.

User experience has never been something that open source projects are known for. If you've used GIMP or OpenOffice or other tools, you know that the user interfaces are probably designed by the engineers who built the tools, which are great initial iterations. But the polish doesn't compare to close source alternatives.

One of the questions I've been curious about is why designers don't participate as actively within the open source ecosystem as engineers.

Googling, I found lots of different reasons. But this answer on StackExchange summarizes all them well. The quick synopsis:

  1. Open source projects parallelize tasks across lots of people and decisions are made by committee. Designers tend to work in much smaller teams. [Parallelization] becomes design by committee and the final product can easily become an inconsistent mess that no individual who contributed to it will want in their portfolio
  2. The best design teams establish design standards for products. Many innovative companies now have design operations teams that do this is a full-time job. No open-source project to my knowledge has a similar idea.
  3. Open source projects revolve around Github. Most designers have little to no knowledge/experience using this workflow.

I've found other arguments too:

Developer culture praises open source. Designer culture seems to be vehemently opposed to free spec work. link

and, that designers contribute but in a different way:

The analogous [open source contributions] for graphics design would be something like textures & Photoshop filters. Or icon packs. Or fonts. Which you can find lots of for free (sometimes even with useful licensing attached). link

Bridging the gap between design and engineering in open source software is a huge opportunity. There are lots of obstacles to overcome: workflow, structure, appropriate recognition, and perhaps some cultural change.

But if we are able to overcome it, the amount of creativity we could unlock could be enormous. It could catalyze a wave of increasingly beautiful open-source software. If you have interest or are passionate about this topic, please let me know. I'd love to get in touch with you

Interesting thought: “Developer culture praises open source. Designer culture seems to be vehemently opposed to free spec work.” That might explain the fundamental differences between Google and Apple!

Jakub Ne?et?il

Startup Founder, Non-Profit Founder, Tech Geek, Dad

5 å¹´

I’ve been seeing this as well. Very interesting area to explore: how to make OSS that’s highly usable and user-friendly.

赞
回复
Rupen P.

Chief Executive @ CXOsync | Empowering Collaboration and Connection for Business Leaders through Innovation.

5 å¹´

I think it's more the nature of the work and the people involved. Designers are artistic types. If they do it for fun or personal enrichment it looks like DeviantArt. User Interface design is more of a profession than anything. People do it to make money.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Tomasz Tunguz的更多文章

  • The Third UI : The Rise & Fall of the Keyboard

    The Third UI : The Rise & Fall of the Keyboard

    I remember the day I received it : my first Blackberry. A few weeks later I lost it in the back of a taxi cab in Paris.

    20 条评论
  • The Implications of the Wiz/Google Deal

    The Implications of the Wiz/Google Deal

    Is tech M&A back? Google announced its intention to buy Wiz for $32b today. If approved by regulators, it would be the…

    6 条评论
  • Halving R&D with AI & the Impact to Valuation

    Halving R&D with AI & the Impact to Valuation

    Engineering teams within AI application startups are much smaller than a classic software company - maybe half the size…

    9 条评论
  • The Mirage in the Software Clouds

    The Mirage in the Software Clouds

    Public SaaS companies’ growth rates have halved since 2023, as David Spitz pointed, from 36% to 17%. Why? There are…

    12 条评论
  • This Analysis Cost 27 Cents

    This Analysis Cost 27 Cents

    Monday’s analysis cost about 27 cents to produce. This little screenshot is of Claude Code, the product I use now to…

    9 条评论
  • Positioning Startups in the Age of AI

    Positioning Startups in the Age of AI

    How do you position and scale an AI company in a rapidly evolving market? Join us for an in-person Office Hours session…

    6 条评论
  • How Much Is A Venture Firm Worth?

    How Much Is A Venture Firm Worth?

    A small spin-out from a publicly traded behemoth launched with the ambitious vision of transforming their entire…

    5 条评论
  • Why War & Peace Is Killing Your Data Budget

    Why War & Peace Is Killing Your Data Budget

    Imagine if every time you edited a document, the word processor forced you to retype everything that had been written…

    3 条评论
  • A Founder's Guide: Essential Management Advice for Startups

    A Founder's Guide: Essential Management Advice for Startups

    As startups scale, effective management becomes the difference between chaotic growth and sustainable success. After…

    10 条评论
  • Lopsided AI Revenues

    Lopsided AI Revenues

    Which is the best business in AI at the moment? I analyzed Q4 revenue data from publicly traded companies across…

    8 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了