Is Design Education—and Creativity as a Whole—on the Decline in the UK Due to the Emphasis on STEM and Rising Tuition Fees?

In recent years, I’ve grown increasingly concerned about the state of design education in the UK, and with good reason. Across our schools and universities, there’s an unmistakable shift toward prioritising STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) subjects. This trend may be logical in light of technological advances and the demand for STEM skills in today’s job market, but I can’t help wondering if the rise of STEM is coming at the expense of creativity, especially design education. Design has been a driving force in some of the UK’s greatest industries—from fashion and architecture to media and product development. So, I’m worried: is this STEM focus causing design education to decline, and if so, are we at risk of stifling creativity altogether?

?

Adding to this is the rise in tuition fees, which complicates the choice for students who might be drawn to design but hesitate due to financial considerations. With tuition fees reaching ￡9,500 a year, students may be forced to weigh their options carefully, often prioritising subjects seen as more ‘economically viable.’ It’s hard to ignore how this financial burden may discourage students from pursuing creative degrees, especially when design careers are perceived as less stable or lucrative compared to STEM.

?

The Reality of STEM’s Rise, Creative Subjects’ Decline, and Rising Tuition Costs

I can see why the UK government has chosen to emphasise STEM. After all, technology, engineering, and science careers are high-growth areas with plenty of job opportunities and economic impact. I don’t question the value of STEM; what concerns me is the unintended consequence this focus seems to be having on creative subjects. I often read about funding cuts to art and design programs, which have seen dwindling numbers of students in recent years. It’s even common now to hear that some secondary schools are dropping design and technology (D&T) altogether, partly because these courses are expensive to run and partly because STEM is now considered the “smart” choice.

?

Now, with higher tuition fees, students must factor the cost of their education into their subject choices. Understandably, they may feel more inclined to choose degrees in fields that promise a quicker financial return. When I consider how much a degree now costs, it’s easy to see how subjects like design—where career paths can be less predictable or may require additional investment in portfolios, freelance work, or internships—may seem risky. I worry that rising tuition fees are driving even more students away from creative fields, ultimately narrowing their educational choices.

?

The Decline of Design in Schools

Seeing design education sidelined in schools is particularly concerning to me. Design isn’t just another subject; it combines practical skills, problem-solving, and creativity in ways that students won’t necessarily find in other areas. When I was in school, D&T (though not called that) was widely available and encouraged students to experiment, make things with their hands, and develop critical thinking skills. Today, it feels like this experience is slipping away. Government statistics show a sharp decline in D&T enrolment, and I believe the blame lies in how our education system increasingly measures success by standardised test scores and STEM achievements.

?

For many students, secondary school provides their only access to hands-on design experiences, as pursuing these subjects at university has become financially daunting.

?

The Impact on Universities, the Creative Industries, and Student Debt

This issue isn’t confined to secondary schools—it’s affecting higher education and the creative industries too. Many universities report declining enrolment in arts and design programs, a trend that risks reducing the UK’s talent pool for the very industries that have brought us global recognition. I see this as a serious issue: the creative sector is a huge economic force in the UK, generating over ￡100+ billion annually. If fewer students pursue design degrees, I can’t help but wonder where the next generation of creators and innovators will come from.

?

The prospect of student debt only adds to the pressure, especially for those considering careers in design where early job earnings might be modest. Some students may feel compelled to choose subjects with a clearer financial payoff, like engineering or computer science, rather than design or the arts. I worry that by narrowing students’ educational paths so early, we’re limiting their potential to contribute in meaningful ways, whether in design or other industries.

?

Are STEM and Creativity Truly Opposed?

One question I keep coming back to is whether we really must choose between STEM and creativity. From my perspective, STEM and the arts don’t have to be opposites. Many STEM fields rely on creativity for breakthroughs, and plenty of creative roles benefit from technical knowledge. For example, fields like user experience (UX) design, architecture, and product design demand both technical skills and creative vision. It’s clear to me that if we merged STEM with the arts—something often called STEAM—we could create a more balanced approach to education that encourages innovation from multiple angles.

?

Some schools and universities have started to experiment with STEAM by integrating arts with traditional STEM subjects. I think this is promising, but I’d like to see this approach gain more traction across the UK. By nurturing creativity within STEM, we could produce students who are not only skilled in technical areas but also capable of innovative, more creative thinking.

?

Why Design Education Matters for Broader Skills Development

Beyond its economic contributions, I believe design education offers invaluable skills for students, no matter where they ultimately end up. Design encourages students to look at problems from different perspectives, to experiment, and to learn through trial and error. These are exactly the skills we need in a world that is constantly changing and facing complex global challenges. Design education also helps students develop empathy, as they learn to consider user experience and the impact of their creations. To me, these are fundamental skills that benefit students in any career and contribute to a well-rounded society.

?

In a world driven increasingly by algorithms and automation, design education helps students stay connected to the human side of innovation. Without it, we risk raising generations that lack a sense of aesthetic judgment and may undervalue human-centred design principles. I’m convinced that the absence of design education would not only hurt individuals but also society as a whole.

?

Looking Forward: How Can We Support Both STEM and Creativity?

I believe there’s a way forward that doesn’t involve sacrificing design education at the altar of STEM or excluding students due to high tuition costs. Here are a few ideas I think could help us strike a better balance:

1.?Adopting STEAM: We could officially bring arts into the STEM framework, creating a more interdisciplinary approach that values both creative and analytical skills. A national STEAM initiative would emphasise the importance of creativity in technical fields and promote a more well-rounded education.

2.?Reassessing Funding and Resources: Design programs deserve more support in terms of funding, resources, and experienced educators. I think investing in design at all levels—from primary to university—is crucial for keeping creativity alive in the curriculum.

3.?Increasing Financial Support for Design Students: More scholarships, grants, and other funding mechanisms could help make design education accessible to students from all backgrounds. By reducing the financial burden, we could encourage more students to pursue design without fear of debt.

4.?Raising Awareness of Creative Careers: Schools and colleges need to do more to show students the exciting and viable career paths in the creative industries. By promoting these opportunities, we could help dispel the myth that STEM is the only way to a successful future.

5.?Policy Reform: Education policy could do more to emphasise the value of creative skills as core competencies, particularly in a rapidly evolving job market. This could include revised assessment models that celebrate experimentation and design thinking.

6.?Industry Partnerships: Creative industries could partner with schools and universities to give students a taste of real-world design work. This exposure could highlight the relevance of design skills and inspire more young people to pursue them.

?

In Conclusion: We Need a Balanced Approach

While I understand the importance of STEM in today’s economy, I’m increasingly convinced that we need to balance it with support for design and other creative subjects. We’re at risk of limiting students’ potential, not only as future workers but as fully engaged thinkers and problem-solvers. STEM and creativity aren’t mutually exclusive—in fact, they complement each other in powerful ways. For the UK to remain a leader in creativity and innovation, I believe it’s essential to protect and promote design education alongside STEM, making it financially accessible to all students. Let’s create a future where our students don’t have to choose between being scientists or artists, but can thrive as both.