Dermal fillers vs facelifts: Know the difference between the two popular choices
Understanding the world of cosmetic procedures can be daunting, especially with the array of myths and facts surrounding fillers and facelifts. It is vital to know your options and consult with a qualified professional to empower yourself and make informed decisions that align with your aesthetic goals and personal needs.
Do you find yourself contemplating the best options to combat the signs of ageing? With an array of treatments available, two of the most popular choices are dermal fillers and facelifts. While both aim to enhance facial aesthetics, they offer different benefits and cater to distinct needs. Unfortunately, misconceptions surrounding these procedures can often lead to confusion. Therefore understanding the differences between fillers and facelifts is important for making informed decisions about your facial rejuvenation journey.
Fillers, or dermal fillers, are injectable treatments that use substances like hyaluronic acid to restore lost volume, reduce wrinkles, and smooth fine lines, explains Dr Karishma Kagodu, a plastic and cosmetic surgeon at Dr. Karishma Aesthetics, Bengaluru. “Ideal for those who want to delay the signs of ageing or are not ready for surgery, fillers stimulate collagen production, enhancing facial contours and addressing static wrinkles around the mouth and lips," says Dr Kagodu, adding, “On the other hand, a facelift (or rhytidectomy) involves surgical intervention. This procedure removes excess skin, tightens underlying tissues, and repositions the skin on the face and neck, providing a more permanent solution for sagging skin and deep folds. Facelifts are best suited for people with strong, well-defined bone structures seeking dramatic, long-lasting results.” Factors such as age, natural facial contours, and the severity of ageing symptoms dictate whether fillers or a facelift is more appropriate.
Dr Kagodu unveils some? myths associated with the treatments:
Myth: Fillers can achieve the same results as surgical facelifts
Fact: Fillers are effective for restoring volume and smoothing wrinkles but cannot replicate the comprehensive effects of a facelift. Fillers are temporary solutions, requiring touch-ups every six months to a year, while facelifts provide results lasting 10 to 12 years or more, addressing more severe signs of ageing.
领英推荐
Myth: There are no risks associated with fillers, but facelifts do have risks
Fact: While fillers are less invasive, they still carry risks, especially if administered by unqualified professionals. Complications can include infection and skin necrosis. Facelifts also carry risks, including anesthesia reactions and post-operative discomfort, but these are generally manageable under a skilled surgeon’s care.
Myth: Facelifts are only for older patients, but fillers are for younger ones.
Fact: There is no age limit for choosing either treatment. Fillers can be suitable for younger individuals showing early signs of aging, while facelifts are ideal for those over 45 or 50 who need a more permanent solution to significant skin laxity.
Source - Money Control
I produced animation for the world-famous TV series The Garfield Show and am currently creating a feature-length documentary about physical appearance titled LOOKS PHILOSOPHY.
1 个月Hi, My name is Pawel Lipka, and I am producing a full-length educational film called “LOOKS.” The project is being created in collaboration with aesthetic clinics and the cosmetics industry. Perhaps you would like to become a part of this project. If you are interested, please contact me on LinkedIn so I can provide more details.