A summary of a UNSW paper on 'Insolvency and illegal phoenix activity in the construction industry: An analysis of the current measures in place and potential for law reform' by Trisha Hassan PhD UNSW Business School of Accounting, Auditing and Taxation. Read the full paper or read summary of 4 reports from 2023 - 2014 .
Gaps and inconsistencies?
- Complexity and accessibility: The legislation is often seen as complex and difficult for subcontractors to navigate, especially for smaller businesses without legal support.??
- Inconsistent application: There are variations in how the legislation is applied across different states and territories, leading to confusion and uneven protection for subcontractors.??
- Limited scope: The legislation does not cover all types of construction contracts, leaving some subcontractors without protection.??
- Residential Construction: There is limited applicability of the legislation to residential construction projects, which can leave many subcontractors in this sector vulnerable.??
- Small Contracts: Smaller contracts often fall outside the scope of the legislation, meaning subcontractors working on these projects may not benefit from the protections offered.??
- Adjudication process: The adjudication process can be complex, lengthy, costly and not always effective in ensuring timely payments, which can deter subcontractors from pursuing claims.??
- Challenges in enforcement: Subcontractors often face difficulties in enforcing payment claims, even after successful adjudications.??
- Legal support: Smaller subcontractors may lack the resources to navigate the legal system effectively, making it harder for them to enforce their rights.??
- Awareness and Education: Increase awareness and education about subcontractors’ rights and the available enforcement mechanisms to ensure they are better equipped to protect their interests.??
- Recommendations: The report suggests enhancing enforcement mechanisms by streamlining the adjudication process, providing better support for subcontractors, and ensuring that adjudication decisions are more easily enforceable.??
- Judicial interpretations of the Security of Payment legislation have created additional hurdles for subcontractors, adding layers of complexity to the legislation, making it harder for subcontractors to understand and navigate the legal requirements. Judicial interpretations have sometimes led to ambiguities in key provisions, such as what constitutes a valid payment claim, which can result in disputes and delays.??
- Regular Reviews: Statutory reviews should be implemented to ensure the legislation remains effective and responsive to the needs of the construction industry.??
Impact analysis?
- Economic Impact: Non-payment and delayed payments can lead to significant financial strain on subcontractors, affecting their cash flow, profitability, and overall business viability. This can result in increased borrowing, insolvency, and job losses.??
- Social Impact: The financial instability caused by non-payment can have severe personal consequences for subcontractors, including stress, mental health issues, and strained relationships. It also affects the livelihoods of employees and their families.??
- Industry-Wide Effects: Widespread non-payment issues can undermine trust and cooperation within the construction industry, leading to a less collaborative and more adversarial working environment. This can reduce overall productivity and efficiency.??
XpedePay the insolvency risk mitigation tool for construction project owners, developers, financiers & contractors, provides oversight and early warning of insolvency within your project’s supply chain. Autonomous monitoring alerts you when payment defaults occur, within the key subcontractor network working on your project, giving you time to take corrective action
#ConstructionTech #ConstructionInsolvency
