Deploying ISO rates - what are my options?

Deploying ISO rates - what are my options?

I've been speaking with insurers across the United States who are gearing up to launch new products, and one topic that often comes up is how to effectively incorporate Verisk's ISO offerings into their pricing strategies.

When an insurer decides to develop a new product using ISO rates, they're accessing extensive industry data and expertise. Verisk provides detailed loss costs and rating factors covering a wide range of risk characteristics, offering a solid foundation for accurate pricing. The challenge is integrating this information into pricing models and operational systems.

Traditionally, insurers have had to manually enter ISO rates into their systems—a process that is time-consuming and prone to errors. Verisk's "Rating-as-a-Service" solution offers an alternative. This cloud-based platform provides real-time access to the latest rates and rules, integrating via APIs with existing systems. This reduces manual effort and speeds up time to market.

However, relying solely on Verisk's system has pros and cons. On the positive side, insurers get up-to-date information and a reduced manual workload, ensuring compliance and efficiency. But there are limitations in flexibility. Using a standardized system may restrict the ability to customize models to fit unique business needs, and there's a dependency on a single provider, which could pose risks if their platform has issues or changes in pricing. Also, ongoing subscription fees might be higher over the long term compared to investing in proprietary systems.

Alternatively, platforms like Swallow offer more flexibility. Swallow provides a pricing platform that allows insurers to incorporate ISO data while building and deploying their own proprietary models. This is appealing for teams eager to innovate beyond standard models. With Swallow, insurers can integrate data from various sources, experiment with advanced analytics, and iterate quickly, all whilst recording changes for compliance.

This presents a choice. Do insurers opt for the convenience of Verisk's ready-made service, or do they embrace the innovation potential that platforms like Swallow offer? There isn't a one-size-fits-all answer—it depends on an organization's capabilities, resources, and goals.

What's clear is that the industry is increasingly embracing data science and advanced analytics in product development. By adopting platforms that support modern modeling techniques and foster collaboration between actuaries and data scientists, insurers can create more responsive and competitive products. Whether choosing Verisk's service, Swallow, or a mix of both, the key is to use tools that enhance the ability to assess risk accurately and efficiently.

Integrating these new technologies and platforms will be essential for staying ahead in the insurance sector. There's a wealth of opportunities for those ready to embrace these advancements.

Sources:

  • Verisk Analytics (2023). Discover How Cloud-Based Rating Can Deliver Speed and Value.
  • Swallow Pricing Platform (2023). Modernizing Insurance Pricing Models.
  • Insurance Journal (2023). "The Future of Insurance Technology and APIs".

Steve Genett

Specialty Commercial | Fractional COO & Advisor | Consultant | CPCU, RPLU, Licensed Broker | New Ventures, Growth, Transformation

2 个月

Especially in E&S where the pricing is typically very different from the admitted risk benchmarks, rating tools need to be flexible and powerful enough to accommodate many unique use cases in how the data is applied. From what I've seen of Swallow, it looks like it can handle that kind of complexity

Andrew Peet

Entrepreneurial Insurance Broker and AI Solution Provider

2 个月

What happened to Occam’s razor?

Luis Diaz

Co-Founder at ClaimMentor | Revolutionizing Claims with AI

2 个月

There is nothing convenient about Verisk's "Ready-Made Service" The main issue with Verisk Rating as a Service is that it is not modern Software product and difficult to integrate with. There is a reason why most Insurance Core Platform providers need to invest heavily into R&D to just stay up to date on the latest releases. CCing some rating experts that I know. Perhaps I am being too harsh. Have they completely re-architected their platform in the past 3 years? It is was always difficult to take updates for Forms, Rates and Rules. Kenneth Brower, Vahid Mansoori, Nav Badheka, Mark Mavromatis

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Sam Clifton的更多文章

  • Tackling Insurtech Challenges

    Tackling Insurtech Challenges

    Insurtechs are transforming the insurance industry with tech-driven solutions, but they face persistent obstacles that…

    1 条评论
  • An actuary and a data scientist

    An actuary and a data scientist

    "walk into a bar..

    7 条评论
  • The Software House Tax

    The Software House Tax

    We've recently been speaking with brokers, MGAs and technology providers about the challenges and opportunities they’re…

    5 条评论
  • The E&S Pricing Opportunity

    The E&S Pricing Opportunity

    Understanding Excess and Surplus (E&S) Lines Insurance Excess and Surplus (E&S) lines insurance provides coverage for…

    1 条评论
  • A brief history of autonomous vehicles (or why we invested in Apex.AI)

    A brief history of autonomous vehicles (or why we invested in Apex.AI)

    Last week, we were excited to announce our latest investment in Apex.AI alongside Volvo Group Venture Capital and HELLA…

    3 条评论
  • InMotion Ventures Micromobility Market Map

    InMotion Ventures Micromobility Market Map

    With the explosion of micromobility in Europe over the past year and InMotion’s focus on the space, I’ve been…

    14 条评论
  • InMotion Ventures invests in Voyage, a self-driving car company.

    InMotion Ventures invests in Voyage, a self-driving car company.

    Voyage, an InMotion Ventures portfolio company, has announced their $31 million Series B funding round, here. We’re…

    2 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了