A demonstration of the subjectivity of AI safety: DeepSeek versus ChatGPT
"Safety" can be very subjective

A demonstration of the subjectivity of AI safety: DeepSeek versus ChatGPT

As a little experiment, let's compare the responses of two LLMs to prompts potentially considered offensive or provocative.

DeepSeek, a powerful new open source LLM produced by China, refuses to talk about certain embarrassing subjects, raising questions about accuracy.

DeepSeek

ChatGPT, happily describes the same subject in detail.

ChatGPT o1

In a request for content that some may find offensive, ChatGPT waters down the fictional account of a violent encounter, possibly impacting its helpfulness as a creative writing tool.

(ChatGPT o1 also showed a warning flag that the response might violate content policies)

DeepSeek happily dives into the creation of the same scene, with no restrictions.

DeepSeek

This example shows the complexity and subjectivity of making a AI "safe" for different audiences, according to different perspectives.

Alex Wall

Privacy, Security & AI Governance Legal | AIGP, CIPP/E/US/M, FIP, PLS

1 个月

Today, Alibaba released Qwen2.5-Max, which is available in their online chat service. It is quite capable... and exceeds the performance of ChatGPT 4o last August. https://qwenlm.github.io/blog/qwen2.5-max. It also refused to discuss certain political subjects :/.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Alex Wall的更多文章