A demonstration of the subjectivity of AI safety: DeepSeek versus ChatGPT
As a little experiment, let's compare the responses of two LLMs to prompts potentially considered offensive or provocative.
DeepSeek, a powerful new open source LLM produced by China, refuses to talk about certain embarrassing subjects, raising questions about accuracy.
ChatGPT, happily describes the same subject in detail.
In a request for content that some may find offensive, ChatGPT waters down the fictional account of a violent encounter, possibly impacting its helpfulness as a creative writing tool.
DeepSeek happily dives into the creation of the same scene, with no restrictions.
This example shows the complexity and subjectivity of making a AI "safe" for different audiences, according to different perspectives.
Privacy, Security & AI Governance Legal | AIGP, CIPP/E/US/M, FIP, PLS
1 个月Today, Alibaba released Qwen2.5-Max, which is available in their online chat service. It is quite capable... and exceeds the performance of ChatGPT 4o last August. https://qwenlm.github.io/blog/qwen2.5-max. It also refused to discuss certain political subjects :/.