Degaussing of Vessel Magnetic Signature Using ANSYS Maxwell
Ramy Elghandour, PhD.
Strategic Accounts Manager @ Fluid Codes | Life-cycle Management, Problem Solving
The magnetic signature of a vessel is a crucial factor in maritime operations, especially in military applications where stealth is essential. Accurate simulation of this signature
This framework provides a comprehensive overview of simulating vessel magnetic signatures using ANSYS Maxwell, addressing both the technical process and the theoretical background essential for effective modeling. Also you can use ANSYS Maxwell to effectively analyze and optimize the degaussing systems of naval vessels, enhancing their stealth capabilities.
A vessel’s magnetic signature arises from its materials and the operational currents within its systems. Key components influencing the signature include:
1. Hull Materials: Ferromagnetic materials can significantly enhance the magnetic signature due to their high magnetic permeability.
2. Electrical Equipment: The onboard electrical systems produce stray magnetic fields.
3. Environmental Factors: Variations in the Earth’s magnetic field and surrounding sea conditions can also affect the signature.
3.???? ?Simulation Process
a. Define the Problem
Before simulation, clearly define the objectives, such as the frequency range of interest and the specific aspects of the magnetic signature to be analyzed. Understanding these requirements sets the foundation for an effective simulation.
b. Create the Geometry
Using ANSYS Discovery, create a 3D model of the vessel. Include all critical components, such as:
- Hull structure
- Propulsion systems
- Onboard equipment
Accurate material properties are vital for realistic simulations. Assign the following properties to different parts of the vessel:
- Magnetic Permeability: Especially important for ferromagnetic materials.
- Conductivity: Impacts how currents flow and how magnetic fields are generated.
Select the simulation type (static or transient) based on the operational conditions. Configure boundary conditions to represent the environment around the vessel, ensuring realistic interactions with external magnetic fields.
e. Mesh the Geometry
A fine mesh around critical areas enhances the accuracy of the simulation. Use adaptive meshing techniques to optimize the mesh density where necessary, especially near edges and corners of the hull.?
领英推荐
f. Define Excitations
Input any external magnetic fields or currents that might affect the simulation. This includes both the vessel's operational conditions and environmental magnetic fields.
g. Run the Simulation
Execute the simulation in ANSYS Maxwell, monitoring for convergence and computational efficiency. Adjust settings as necessary based on the initial outcomes.
h. Post-Processing
Utilize ANSYS Maxwell's post-processing tools to analyze
i. Validation
To ensure accuracy, compare simulation results with experimental data or results from existing literature. Validation enhances the reliability of the model and ensures that the results are representative of real-world conditions.
?
j. Optimization
If the simulation indicates a significant magnetic signature, consider design modifications to minimize it. This might involve changing materials, altering shapes, or redesigning electrical systems.
4.??? Degaussing of vessel magnetic signature
Degaussing a naval vessel involves reducing the magnetic signature of the ship to minimize the risk of detection by magnetic mines and sensors. ANSYS Maxwell, which is a tool for electromagnetic field simulations, can be effectively used to model and analyze the degaussing system.
5.??? Conclusion
Simulating the magnetic signature of a vessel using ANSYS Maxwell is a multi-step process that requires careful consideration of geometry, material properties, and environmental factors. The insights gained from such simulations can lead to more effective vessel designs with reduced detectability
6.?? References
1. G. K. Chang, "Electromagnetic Fields and Waves," Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2020. doi:10.3390/jmse8010001.
2. A. P. A. H. S. Z. K. A. Moiseyev, "Modeling Magnetic Signatures of Underwater Vessels Using Computational Electromagnetics," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 1-8, 2020. doi:10.1109/TMAG.2020.2977811.
3. ANSYS, "ANSYS Maxwell User's Guide," ANSYS, Inc., 2023.
4. J. L. García, "Vessel Design Considerations for Reduced Magnetic Signatures," Marine Technology, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 85-92, 2021. doi:10.4031/MTSJ.58.2.5.
?
Professor at the Elmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University
1 个月CONS: The presentation is a clean, general commercial for a software tool. PROS: It's unclear what the advantages of using ANSYS Maxwell vs. other tools on the market are. Can we model stress-induced permeability changes in the hull? Or is it possible to get into optimization? What is the computational cost of a typical model? Finally, most of the figures are taken from other sources (with no references); however, I failed to find all of the included references, excluding the ANSYS manual; this makes me think about a possible LLM hallucination here. ;D
Field Engineer at Specified
5 个月Good and interesting research