Defense

Click here for PDF : In English - auf Deutsch - in het Nederlands

The United States dedicates a substantial portion of its budget to defense, a figure equivalent to the combined expenditures of the following ten nations, totaling approximately 40% of the global aggregate. In a world marked by escalating geopolitical tensions, illustrated by American engagements such as supporting Ukraine and Israel and addressing Houthi rebels, alongside the looming risk of conflict in the Taiwan Strait, notable inefficiencies have surfaced. These inefficiencies not only result in financial burdens but also impose a toll in terms of human lives. A comprehensive study conducted by Bloomberg highlights various factors contributing to these inefficiencies. Among the most relevant ones are higher operational costs in the US relative to other nations, bureaucratic inefficiencies, the expansive scope of America's global military commitments, consolidation within the defense industry, and inherent uncertainties within the budgetary process. In the aftermath of the Cold War, Washington advocated for major American defense corporations to streamline their operations as defense expenditures dwindled. Consequently, a select few large entities now dominate the majority of defense contracts in the US, with the top three firms commanding over half of the aerospace and defense sector's revenues, and the top ten firms claiming 90% of the market share. This consolidation has stifled competition and restricted opportunities for new entrants, fostering an environment conducive to price inflation.

In the early 2000s, amid a perceived absence of Western conflict, corporations, investors, and consumers, had plenty of opportunity to deliberate on corporate responsibility and the imperative for Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) policies. During this period, the defense manufacturing sector faced significant criticism from an ESG perspective. However, the landscape underwent a seismic shift following Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, prompting Western nations to prioritize defense procurement. In response, weapons manufacturers asserted that their industry epitomized the essence of ESG, advocating for its acknowledgment as a positive contributor to "social sustainability" within the ESG framework. Concurrently, a growing number of European funds began excluding defense from their portfolios in the late 2010s, influenced by prevailing trends and investment banking practices. Russia's incursion into Ukraine and Germany's notable shift in defense policy, defense companies continue to face stricter financing conditions than their non-defense counterparts, with some fund managers abstaining from defense investments altogether. This situation is particularly pronounced in Europe, where governments and the EU have traditionally prioritized ESG concerns more than their U.S. counterparts. However, increased defense spending by governments remains ineffective if financiers hesitate to invest in defense. While industry behemoths like Lockheed can expand independently, the defense sector comprises numerous small and medium-sized enterprises essential for production and innovation. While the focus on ESG remains laudable, there is a growing realization that the deteriorating global security landscape necessitates adjustments. Believing in defense to expedite production growth is crucial given its pivotal role in safeguarding Western countries' security and values.

Established in the aftermath of World War II, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) functions as both a military and political alliance, dedicated to safeguarding the security and freedom of each member state. In instances where diplomatic initiatives prove ineffective, NATO stands prepared to undertake crisis-management operations, utilizing its collective military capabilities to address emerging challenges. At present there are 32 members of NATO. During the 2014 summit, all NATO members agreed to spend at least 2% of their GDPs on defense by 2025. Today only 11 out of 32 nations meet this threshold.

In spending pro Capita the US is still on top, followed closely by the Nordic countries.

The U.S. and China are the most represented countries on this list, with six and five respective companies in the top 15. The U.S. consistently has the world’s largest military budget, so it’s no surprise that American companies dominate this ranking.